Company Directory - Target Corporation
Company Details - Target Corporation
Target Corporation
WebsiteMinneapolis, United States
1900 Locations
Target Corporation is an American retail corporation that operates a chain of discount department stores and hypermarkets. Known for its broad range of products including apparel, home goods, electronics, and groceries, it is the seventh-largest retailer in the United States and a component of the S&P 500 Index.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Target Corporation
-19.90
0.01%
Latest Event
Target DEI Rollback Dampens Pride Sponsorship
Target Corporation opted out of sponsoring major LGBTQ Pride events, with several organizers citing the company’s rollback of DEI initiatives as the reason for their decision, reflecting a disconnect with marginalized communities amid a politically charged environment.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
ENABLER
Target Corporation is currently rated as an Enabler.
Latest Events
- APR142025
Target Corporation opted out of sponsoring major LGBTQ Pride events, with several organizers citing the company’s rollback of DEI initiatives as the reason for their decision, reflecting a disconnect with marginalized communities amid a politically charged environment.
- APR022025
Amid President Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs, Target Corporation announced that it would pass on some of the increased import costs to customers, potentially resulting in higher prices for consumers. This decision reflects a business strategy that prioritizes maintaining profit margins over buffering economic pressure on lower-income shoppers.
- MAR292025
The article notes that conservative groups have targeted companies like Target for catering to LGBTQ customers, as part of a broader boycott against what they perceive as progressive business practices. This external political pressure highlights Target's commitment to diversity and inclusion despite facing backlash from far‐right elements.
- MAR292025Target Cuts Employee Bonuses
-40.00
Target announced a reduction in bonuses for salaried employees from 100% to 87% due to weak consumer spending and inflationary pressures, a move that negatively impacts worker welfare.
- MAR282025
According to a Business Insider report published on 2025-03-28, Target Corporation, along with other companies like Amazon, has reduced its commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. This pullback, attributed to pressures following the recent presidential administration's stance on DEI, may undermine progress for marginalized communities.
- FEB282025
An article reports that Target Corporation rolled back its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, which may have contributed to a 5 million visit decline over a four‐week period. The rollback is linked to diminished engagement from marginalized consumers, particularly Black and Hispanic communities, raising concerns about the company aligning with anti-DEI pressures.
- FEB242025
Target Corporation scaled back its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, discontinuing minority hiring targets and its Pride Month merchandise. This move has led to lawsuits initiated by conservative legal entities and sparked boycott movements by civil rights and community groups, reflecting a retreat under political pressure.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
Target's decision to retreat from its DEI commitments, including scaling back minority hiring targets and discontinuing diversity reports, suggests a capitulation to conservative and authoritarian pressures. This undermines progressive values and provides an opportunity for far-right legal challenges, as seen with lawsuits from conservative figures, thereby negatively impacting public political behavior.
Target Caught in DEI Crossfire as Lawsuits and Boycotts Mount
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 5
By scaling back on its DEI initiatives and reducing minority hiring commitments, Target has compromised its business practices and ethical responsibility. This retreat not only negatively affects marginalized communities but also exposes the company to financial instability and legal risks, highlighting a failure in upholding ethical business standards.
Target Caught in DEI Crossfire as Lawsuits and Boycotts Mount
- FEB062025
Target Corp's political action committee contributed a total of $412,500 to federal candidates during the 2023-2024 election cycle, allocating $235,000 (56.97%) to Republican candidates and $172,000 (41.70%) to Democratic candidates. The data, released by the FEC on 2025-02-06, highlights the company’s political spending practices.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
The Target Corp PAC contributions, which predominantly benefited Republican candidates, raise concerns from an anti-authoritarian perspective. With a majority of the funds directed to GOP candidates—who are increasingly associated with authoritarian policies—the financial engagement can be seen as indirectly supporting anti-democratic influence. This action falls under the category of Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts, highlighting the company's active role in political financing.
Target Corp PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates • OpenSecrets
- FEB062025
OpenSecrets data reveals that Target Corp contributed $1,362,939 in the 2024 cycle and spent $2,760,000 on lobbying. The profile also highlights that a significant share of Target Corp's lobbyists had previously held government positions, raising concerns about revolving door practices and potential regulatory capture.
-30
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
Target Corp's political spending and revolving door connections indicate an entrenched engagement in influencing policy through lobbying and political contributions. Such practices can facilitate undue influence over regulatory bodies and contribute to crony capitalism, concerns that are especially alarming from an anti-authoritarian perspective.
- JAN312025
Civil rights activists have called for a national boycott of Target following the company's decision to drop its DEI initiatives, raising serious questions about its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 19
Target's decision to drop its DEI initiatives represents a significant rollback in its efforts to support an inclusive and equitable work environment. This move has sparked nationwide protests and boycott calls by civil rights activists, undermining the company's ethical responsibilities toward labor relations and human rights. Such a shift not only alienates marginalized groups but also risks contributing to a sociopolitical climate that may indirectly bolster authoritarian practices.
Target hit with national boycott call over decision to drop DEI initiatives
- JAN302025
Target Corporation has decided to phase out its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, sparking a boycott from civil rights activists. Critics argue that this rollback reflects a capitulation to conservative authoritarian pressures, undermining the company’s historic commitment to social justice and equitable labor practices.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 19
Target's decision to drop DEI initiatives appears influenced by executive deference to conservative pressures, signaling a retreat from its previous leadership in social justice. This rollback in political commitment has not only eroded trust among civil rights groups but also contributed to an environment where authoritarian perspectives are emboldened.
Civil Rights Activists Call for a Target Boycott After Retailer Backs Away From Diversity Programs
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 19
Phasing out its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs represents a significant retreat from Target’s commitment to equitable business practices and human rights. This decision undermines the welfare of marginalized communities and signals a troubling shift in corporate ethical responsibility, prioritizing short-term appeasement of conservative pressures over longstanding social commitments.
Civil Rights Activists Call for a Target Boycott After Retailer Backs Away From Diversity Programs
- JAN302025
Target’s decision to sunset its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and racial equity programs—once backed by a $2 billion commitment to minority-owned businesses—has led to significant consumer backlash, including organized boycotts and declining store traffic and stock prices. Critics argue that this retreat from inclusive practices compromises ethical business standards and may inadvertently bolster authoritarian tendencies by undermining corporate accountability to marginalized communities.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 19
Target Corporation’s rollback of its DEI initiatives and the renaming of supplier diversity efforts signals a significant shift away from its previously strong commitment to supporting marginalized communities. This decision has sparked consumer boycotts and legal challenges, indicating a failure to uphold ethical business practices and social responsibility, which are critical in countering the rise of authoritarian and fascist trends.
Do Boycotts Work? As Target’s Traffic Declines, Tesla And Others See Consumer Shifts
- JAN282025
Civil rights groups have announced a boycott of Target following the decision to end diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and stop sourcing from minority-owned businesses. Critics argue this move undermines labor rights and ethical supply chain practices, potentially contributing to broader patterns of corporate complicity in regressive policies.
-90
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
Target's decision to end DEI initiatives adversely impacts labor relations and human rights practices. By eliminating policies aimed at promoting the hiring and protection of marginalized workers, the company undermines efforts to support fair workplace practices and reinforces exclusionary dynamics that benefit authoritarian agendas.
Target Faces Boycott After Becoming Latest U.S. Company to Ban DEI Initiatives
-85
Supply Chain Ethics
March 19
By ending its goal of sourcing products from businesses owned by people of color, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, veterans, and people with disabilities, Target signals a retreat from ethical supply chain practices. This decision not only impacts economic opportunities for underrepresented groups but also aligns with broader moves toward exclusionary and authoritarian corporate policies.
Target Faces Boycott After Becoming Latest U.S. Company to Ban DEI Initiatives
- JAN272025
Target Corporation announced the conclusion of several public diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, ceasing participation in third-party surveys and repositioning its supplier diversity team. This move reflects a shift towards a more inward, less publicly accountable approach to DEI, which critics argue undermines the company's historical commitment to inclusive practices and may indirectly enable authoritarian narratives that marginalize minority groups.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 19
Target's decision to end several DEI initiatives represents a rollback of policies that promoted worker inclusion and diversity. From an anti-fascist perspective, scaling back such programs diminishes the corporate commitment to building diverse and equitable work environments, which are essential for resisting discriminatory ideologies. Although internal processes remain, the public removal of these initiatives could embolden regressive political forces and undermine efforts to counter systemic oppression.
Target ends some DEI initiatives, reiterates commitment to belonging and inclusion
- JAN272025
Target Corp. announced the winding down of its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, a decision that led Twin Cities Pride to drop the company as a sponsor. The move, which follows President Trump’s executive order against DEI programs, signals a retreat from commitments to marginalized communities and has raised criticism from local leaders.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
Target's rollback of DEI measures, following pressure from a federal executive order, reflects a politically charged decision that aligns with authoritarian policies. This capitulation to anti-inclusion political currents negatively impacts marginalized communities and undermines progressive public values.
Twin Cities Pride dumps Target Corp. as sponsor over DEI rollback
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 5
By ending its DEI initiatives, Target undermines its ethical responsibility toward inclusivity and worker rights. The decision not only jeopardizes support for marginalized groups but also results in significant community backlash, as evidenced by the loss of a longstanding sponsorship with Twin Cities Pride.
Twin Cities Pride dumps Target Corp. as sponsor over DEI rollback
- JAN242025
Target Corporation announced the rollback of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, including ending its REACH programs and supplier diversity efforts. The move, coming in the wake of political shifts following President Trump's executive order to end DEI programs in the federal government, is seen as aligning the company's internal policies with regressive political trends that undermine efforts toward workplace inclusion and social justice.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
March 19
Target's decision to roll back its DEI programs appears to be politically motivated, aligning its business practices with a broader conservative push that follows President Trump's executive order. This action could be interpreted as a signal of complicity with regressive political ideologies that undermine inclusive practices and weaken commitments to social equity.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
By dismantling key DEI and supplier diversity initiatives, Target is reducing its commitment to labor rights and the protection of marginalized communities. This rollback undermines ethical business practices and can exacerbate inequalities, reflecting a worrisome shift in corporate responsibility.
- JAN242025
On January 24, 2025, Target announced the elimination of hiring goals for minority employees and the disbandment of its racial justice executive committee as part of its 'Belonging at the Bullseye' strategy. This move, seen as a rollback of long-standing diversity initiatives, has provoked a lawsuit by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier and America First Legal, and has drawn criticism from civil rights groups and progressive stakeholders.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
Target's decision to dismantle key DEI initiatives—such as eliminating minority hiring goals and its racial justice committee—undermines its commitment to diversity and inclusion. This retreat from progressive practices not only weakens protection for marginalized groups but also signals corporate acquiescence to right-wing pressures, which is detrimental from an anti-fascist perspective.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
By eliminating programs designed to promote equitable labor practices and protect marginalized workers, Target has compromised its ethical responsibility in labor relations, negatively affecting its workforce representation and undermining progressive inclusion efforts.
- JAN242025
Following the reversal of robust diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, Target has encountered significant financial losses, falling consumer traffic, and intense public scrutiny from minority communities and advocacy groups.
- JAN242025
On January 24, 2025, Target announced the conclusion of its internal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, including efforts to boost Black employee representation, improve Black customer experiences, and support Black-owned businesses. This move has raised concerns about the company's philanthropic commitments and has led progressive activists and nonprofit partners to call for a boycott.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
The rollback of DEI initiatives undermines Target's commitment to promoting racial equity and worker inclusion. This decision negatively affects marginalized communities and signals a shift away from progressive, ethical business practices, which is deeply concerning from a human rights and labor relations perspective.
Target's DEI rollback raises questions about the retail giant's philanthropic commitments
-40
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
Public backlash and boycott calls from progressive groups indicate that Target's rollback of DEI efforts adversely impacts its public-political stance. The decision fuels concerns that the company is aligning more with politically expedient moves rather than upholding progressive values, which harms its reputation among communities that prioritize social justice.
Target's DEI rollback raises questions about the retail giant's philanthropic commitments
- JAN242025
Target Corporation's rollback of key diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, including the elimination of hiring goals and disbanding of a racial justice committee, has ignited a 40-day consumer boycott led by community figures. This move has raised significant concerns regarding the company's commitment to fair labor practices and human rights, potentially aligning it with policies that marginalize underrepresented groups.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
Target Corporation's decision to roll back its DEI initiatives—eliminating minority hiring goals and dismantling an executive committee dedicated to racial justice—signals a diminishing commitment to fair labor practices and the protection of human rights. This shift has spurred a significant consumer backlash in the form of a 40-day boycott, highlighting concerns that the company is veering towards practices that undermine support for marginalized communities, thereby indirectly bolstering authoritarian and exclusionary policies.
A 40-day Target boycott starts today. It couldn’t come at a worse time for the company
- JAN012025
Target has responded to allegations of child labor within its supply chain by launching an independent investigation into a supplier involved in bread product manufacturing. The company reiterated its zero tolerance for underage labor as outlined in its Standards of Vendor Engagement (SOVE) and emphasized ongoing training and auditing for suppliers to ensure compliance with international labor standards.
+70
Supply Chain Ethics
April 5
The company’s proactive response—immediately launching an investigation and reinforcing its strict no underage labor policy—reflects a commitment to ethical supply chain practices. By emphasizing regular training and established vendor standards in line with international human rights frameworks, Target takes steps that support labor rights and oppose exploitation, earning a positive rating under Supply Chain Ethics.
Response from Target to allegations of child labour in its supply chain
- JAN012025
Target’s corporate sustainability page outlines its commitment to ethical sourcing, ensuring that vendors adhere to strict human rights and labor standards. The company emphasizes a responsible supply chain approach, meeting rigorous standards in its domestic and international partnerships.
+90
Supply Chain Ethics
March 19
The 'Responsible Supply Chains' page clearly illustrates that Target is committed to ensuring its vendors and suppliers operate under high ethical standards with respect to human rights and fair labor practices. The detailed guidelines and the availability of a guidebook in multiple languages highlight an ambitious and transparent approach to supply chain ethics.
+85
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
In addition to its supply chain ethics, Target emphasizes compliance with labor and human rights laws through its vendor relationships. The corporate guidelines reinforce the company’s commitment to fair labor practices and workplace safety, contributing positively to human rights standards.
- DEC312024
Target Corporation spent $2.76 million on lobbying in 2024, reflecting an active engagement in influencing U.S. public policy. This significant financial effort to shape legislative outcomes raises concerns about corporate priorities overriding democratic accountability and contributing to conditions favorable to authoritarian practices.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 19
Target Corporation's $2.76 million expenditure on lobbying in 2024 is a clear indicator of its efforts to influence political processes. Such significant lobbying activities are worrisome as they often prioritize corporate interests over public welfare, potentially aiding the rise of authoritarian practices by subverting democratic policymaking.
- JAN012024
Target Corporation has outlined extensive policies and auditing processes to enforce labor rights and ethical supply chain practices. The policy details stringent measures against forced labor, underage labor, and discrimination, and includes comprehensive audits and training programs for suppliers.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
Target’s policies emphasize dignified treatment of workers and strict enforcement against forced, underage, and exploitative labor practices. Their comprehensive auditing process and clear standards for workplace rights demonstrate a robust commitment, although continual improvement is needed to address complexities in global supply chains.
+70
Supply Chain Ethics
March 19
The detailed guidelines for supplier audits, remediation processes, and responsible sourcing underscore Target's commitment to supply chain ethics. While the measures are comprehensive, the inherent challenges in enforcing standards across diverse regions suggest there is still room for further progress.
- JAN012024
In 2024, Target Corporation, along with other big box retailers, lowered prices on select items in an effort to attract shoppers affected by inflation. This competitive pricing strategy contributed to the downturn of discount dollar stores, as reported in the article.
- DEC312023
According to data from OpenSecrets, Target Corp spent $1.8 million on lobbying in 2023. This large sum underscores the company’s active political influence, raising concerns about democratic accountability and the potential alignment with interests that may favor authoritarian or undemocratic policy frameworks.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
The expenditure of $1.8 million on lobbying indicates significant corporate efforts to influence political processes. From an anti-fascist perspective, such financial political influence can undermine democratic mechanisms and contribute to policy outcomes that favor corporate interests over the welfare of marginalized communities.
- DEC312023
OpenSecrets data reports that Target Corp spent $1,800,000 on lobbying activities during 2023, reflecting the company's active engagement in political influence that may bolster corporate priorities over progressive reforms.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
Target Corp's reported expenditure of $1,800,000 on lobbying in 2023 underscores a deliberate effort to influence political outcomes in ways that could protect corporate interests at the expense of democratic accountability and progressive policy initiatives. This kind of activity often contributes to reinforcing power imbalances and undermining worker rights and social equity, which are critical issues from an anti‑fascist perspective.
- DEC312023
Target Corp. disclosed its 2023 list of political contributions, detailing donations of general corporate funds of $5,000 or more to various political organizations. The contributions, made from January 1 to December 31, 2023, include support for both Democratic and Republican entities and are stated to be used solely for educational and association management activities rather than direct campaign funding.
+0
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
The disclosed contributions demonstrate corporate political engagement through transparent reporting of donations to a mix of political groups. While the inclusion of both Democratic and Republican organizations avoids a clear endorsement of authoritarian or far‐right ideologies, corporate political spending remains a contentious issue. From an anti‐fascist perspective, the balanced nature of the contributions and the stated use for non-campaign purposes leads to a neutral score.
- AUG012023
Florida's attorney general has filed a federal lawsuit alleging that Target misled investors by failing to disclose the financial risks associated with its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and Pride campaigns. The suit follows Target's recent discontinuation of several DEI programs, a move seen as capitulating to conservative pressures and potentially undermining support for marginalized communities.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 5
The lawsuit accuses Target of misrepresenting the risks linked to its progressive DEI initiatives and Pride campaigns, thereby deceiving investors and compromising ethical business practices. Such misrepresentations, combined with the subsequent discontinuation of DEI policies, signal a prioritization of financial or political expediency over inclusion.
Florida Sues Target Over Alleged Investor Misrepresentation Tied to DEI Policies
-40
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
Target's decision to discontinue several DEI programs amid allegations of investor misrepresentation is seen as a capitulation to politically charged external pressures. This move potentially undermines efforts to foster corporate engagement in social responsibility, which is vital for supporting marginalized groups.
Florida Sues Target Over Alleged Investor Misrepresentation Tied to DEI Policies
- MAY252023
In response to a viral anti-LGBTQ campaign fueled by far-right voices and social media harassment that threatened employees and store safety, Target removed select Pride Month merchandise. This move, aimed at protecting its workforce, has drawn criticism from LGBTQ advocates who argue that the company is yielding to extremist pressure.
-30
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
Target’s decision to pull Pride merchandise amid far‐right harassment is interpreted as capitulating to extremist pressure rather than taking a bold stand in support of marginalized LGBTQ communities. Although the action aimed to safeguard employee safety, it ultimately reinforces a narrative that prioritizes appeasement over principled support.
-10
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 5
While Target’s removal of controversial items was implemented to protect employee wellbeing amid violent and threatening behavior, the decision is seen as a compromise on Target’s commitment to diversity and inclusion. Criticism from LGBTQ advocacy groups highlights concerns that the company is undermining its ethical responsibilities by yielding to extremist pressure.
- FEB022022
Leaked images and reports reveal that Target Corp. produced union-busting management training materials aimed at dissuading employees from organizing. The materials, reportedly circulated amid labor disputes over COVID-19 protections and hazard pay, encourage managers to create work environments that minimize the perceived need for unions.
-75
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
The leaked anti-union training materials indicate a deliberate effort by Target Corp. to discourage union organizing, undermining workers' rights and fair labor practices. This tactic reflects an anti-worker, authoritarian approach that harms labor relations and supports broader fascist and neoliberal labor suppression trends.
- JAN012022
Target Corp. introduced a comprehensive, risk-based audit program aimed at assessing manufacturing conditions, worker treatment, compensation, and compliance with its Standards of Vendor Engagement (SOVE). The program, which includes human rights training for internal teams and continuous supplier improvement measures, is designed to enhance supply chain transparency and uphold labor rights.
+70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
Target Corp.'s rollout of human rights training to key business areas and inclusion of worker treatment criteria in its audit program demonstrates a commitment to improving labor conditions and respecting human rights within its supply chain, a positive step against authoritarian labor exploitation.
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
April 5
The establishment of a robust audit program that mandates regular, unannounced audits and detailed corrective action plans for suppliers signals a proactive approach towards supply chain ethics. By ensuring transparency and accountability in manufacturing practices, Target is promoting responsible sourcing that protects worker rights and mitigates risks associated with unethical supplier practices.
- JAN012022
Target Corporation has outlined a comprehensive human rights program that includes board oversight, extensive human rights training rolled out in 2022, a dedicated integrity hotline, and rigorous supply chain due diligence, highlighting its commitment to worker rights and ethical sourcing.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
Target’s proactive approach in instituting mandatory human rights training, board oversight of human rights issues, and clear policies against retaliation demonstrates a strong commitment to labor rights and human rights practices for its employees and supply chain partners.
+70
Supply Chain Ethics
April 5
Through ongoing due diligence, stakeholder collaboration with NGOs, and stringent supply chain investigations, Target establishes robust ethical sourcing practices that protect human rights and promote accountability in its vendor network.
- JAN012022
Target's corporate governance webpage outlines robust human rights commitments with strong oversight over labor practices and responsible supply chain management, reflecting a positive ethical stance.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
The article details Target’s comprehensive approach to human rights in the workplace, including board oversight, human rights training, anti-retaliation policies, and ethical labor practices. These measures indicate a strong commitment to protecting employee rights and advancing equitable workplace practices.
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
March 19
The page highlights Target’s proactive measures to ensure supply chain ethics through due diligence, stakeholder engagement, and collaboration with external NGOs and certification bodies. This indicates a deliberate commitment to responsible sourcing and ethical supply chain practices.
- OCT012021
Workers at a Colorado Target store have filed unfair labor practice charges, alleging that store management engaged in union-busting tactics including intimidation, interrogation, and threats to prevent unionization efforts.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
The allegations indicate that Target management engaged in practices that undermine workers' rights and hinder unionization efforts, which aligns with authoritarian and anti‐labor behavior. This is a clear example of union-busting tactics that suppress fair labor practices and worker representation.
- JAN112021
Target Corp.'s political action committee, along with its corporate political contributions, has been temporarily paused following the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol. The company stated that its donation practices, which have traditionally been bipartisan, will be on hold as it reassesses its criteria in a politically volatile environment.
+40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
Target's decision to temporarily pause its political donations, including both PAC contributions and corporate contributions, in the wake of a violent mob breaching the U.S. Capitol represents a cautious stance aimed at curbing further polarization. By halting such donations, the company avoids inadvertently supporting potentially extremist or authoritarian political actors. This move can be interpreted, from an anti-fascist perspective, as a responsible choice to prevent the fueling of divisive politics, despite its historically bipartisan giving.
Target PAC Joins List of Companies Putting Political Donations on Hold
- JAN072021
Target Corp. announced it is temporarily pausing its political contributions through the TargetCitizens PAC following the Capitol riots, emphasizing transparency and a bipartisan approach in response to the recent democratic crisis.
+60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
By halting its political donations in the wake of the Capitol riots incited by extremist behavior, Target demonstrates a proactive measure against bolstering potentially authoritarian political forces. This pause, grounded in the need for transparent and non-partisan contribution practices, aligns with anti-fascist principles of reducing support for political extremism.
Target Confirms It's Pausing Political Donations After Capitol Riots
- FEB182020
A class action lawsuit alleges that Target misclassified its executive team leaders as exempt employees, thereby avoiding overtime payments even though the ETLs performed duties typical of non-exempt workers. The suit claims that such practices forced the employees to work extra hours without proper compensation, highlighting potential abuses in labor rights.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
The lawsuit asserts that Target deliberately misclassified executive team leaders to avoid paying overtime, resulting in employees working longer hours without appropriate compensation. This behavior undermines labor rights and constitutes an exploitative labor practice, marking a negative impact on ethical business practices and employee welfare.
Class Action Alleges Target’s Executive Team Leaders Owed Overtime Wages
- NOV142016
On November 14, 2016, Target announced enhanced efforts to monitor and address forced labor within its supply chain. The initiative includes robust supplier audits, the implementation of corrective action plans in response to forced labor indicators—such as the early 2018 incident in a Malaysian vendor factory—and strengthened accountability measures with industry partners.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
Target’s swift and comprehensive response to forced labor indicators, including detailed corrective action plans and improved worker protections within its supply chain, demonstrates a strong commitment to labor rights and human rights practices. This initiative helps safeguard vulnerable workers and promotes ethical labor standards.
+75
Supply Chain Ethics
April 5
By evolving its oversight approach and implementing strict supplier audit mechanisms along with transparent traceability measures, Target reinforces its commitment to ethical sourcing and supply chain integrity. These efforts are essential for preventing forced labor and ensuring responsible procurement practices.
Alternatives

Bentonville, United States
-27.59

Los Angeles, United States
7.75

Canada
-28.56

Corporation
31.23
Corporation
-57.13
Framingham, United States
17.75
Seattle, United States
20.44

Matthews, United States
-35.54

New York, United States
-56.80

Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
45.75
Corporate Financials
- Revenue
- 2025
- $108.00B
- Total Assets
- 2025
- $60.00B
- Operating Income
- 2025
- $6.00B
- Total Equity
- 2025
- $20.00B
Employees: 400,000
Industries
- 444110
- Home Centers
- 445110
- Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers (except Convenience Retailers)
- 452210
- Department Stores
- 448190
- Other Clothing Stores
- 448140
- Family Clothing Stores
- 452311
- Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters