Company Directory - Georgetown University Law Center
Company Details - Georgetown University Law Center
Georgetown University Law Center
WebsiteWashington, D.C., USA
A prestigious law school located in Washington, D.C. and a constituent of Georgetown University, known for its rigorous legal education, distinguished faculty, and significant contributions to legal scholarship and practice.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Georgetown University Law Center
61.17
-0.03%
Latest Event
Georgetown Law Voices Support for Judicial Reform in Domestic Abuse Cases
Rebecca Epstein, executive director of the Center on Gender Justice and Opportunity at Georgetown Law, commented on the necessity for judicial reform under the Georgia Survivor Justice Act, emphasizing the need to reexamine how domestic abuse survivors are treated in the justice system.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support Georgetown Law by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
LEADER
Georgetown University Law Center is currently rated as a Leader.
Latest Events
- MAR302025
Rebecca Epstein, executive director of the Center on Gender Justice and Opportunity at Georgetown Law, commented on the necessity for judicial reform under the Georgia Survivor Justice Act, emphasizing the need to reexamine how domestic abuse survivors are treated in the justice system.
- MAR282025
At an event held at Georgetown Law Center, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor spoke to students about the importance of an independent judiciary and the danger of arbitrary power amid aggressive attacks from the Trump administration.
- MAR072025
Dean William Treanor of Georgetown University Law Center publicly condemned a threat from acting US Attorney Ed Martin, a Trump ally, who warned that students would be denied government employment opportunities unless the law school removed its diversity, equity, and inclusion curriculum. Treanor’s letter invoked First Amendment rights and affirmed the university’s commitment to fostering a pluralistic educational environment.
+70
Executive Political Engagement
March 28
The dean’s resolute defense of academic freedom and commitment to diversity stands as a strong example of executive political engagement. By challenging the politically motivated threat from a government official aiming to impose ideological constraints, Georgetown Law demonstrates a clear anti-authoritarian stance, earning a high positive score.
Georgetown law dean condemns top DC prosecutor’s threat to not hire students over DEI
- MAR062025
Georgetown Law School, led by Dean William Treanor, defended its curriculum emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion after the interim D.C. U.S. Attorney threatened to withhold hiring from institutions that teach DEI. Treanor argued that government interference in academic content violates the First Amendment, standing up against authoritarian efforts to dictate educational practices.
+80
Executive Political Engagement
March 28
Dean Treanor’s public rebuttal of the U.S. Attorney’s attempt to condition hiring on the absence of DEI in the curriculum is a strong demonstration of commitment to academic freedom and opposition to authoritarian interference. This proactive defense supports marginalized perspectives and resists far-right pressure, earning a high positive score in Executive Political Engagement.
Georgetown Law School defends practices amid US attorney’s DEI threat
- MAR032025
In response to a letter from Interim D.C. U.S. Attorney Ed Martin demanding that Georgetown Law eliminate DEI initiatives under threat of barring federal job opportunities, Dean William M. Treanor defended the institution’s curriculum citing First Amendment protections and the university's Jesuit values. This stance underscores a commitment to diversity, academic freedom, and resistance to authoritarian overreach.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
March 28
By rejecting the federal directive to remove DEI from its curriculum, Georgetown Law not only defends academic freedom and the rights of its students and faculty, but also stands firmly against authoritarian pressures. This proactive defense of diverse educational programs promotes democratic values and opposes efforts to suppress marginalized voices.
- SEP052017
Georgetown University re-signed its retail license agreement with Nike, incorporating provisions that grant the Worker Rights Consortium access to Nike supplier factories. This move, spurred by protests and worker advocacy, required Nike to sign a code of conduct ensuring labor protections and supply chain transparency.
+85
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 28
Georgetown University demanded that Nike sign a strict code of conduct including robust third‐party audits by the Worker Rights Consortium. This insistence on protecting labor rights and ensuring fair treatment of workers is a significant progressive step in upholding workers’ rights and countering exploitative practices.
Nike agrees to third-party audits in new deal with Georgetown University
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
March 28
The new agreement requires Nike to allow the Worker Rights Consortium unfettered access to its supplier factories, thereby enhancing transparency and accountability in its supply chain. This measure helps to ensure consistent monitoring of labor conditions, dissuading exploitative practices.
Nike agrees to third-party audits in new deal with Georgetown University
- DEC092016
Following sustained student protests over documented labor abuses at a Nike contractor in Vietnam, Georgetown University decided not to renew its apparel contract with Nike unless the company signs a compliance agreement with the university's code of conduct. This action aims to enforce ethical supply chain practices and safeguard worker rights.
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
March 28
The university’s decision to condition the renewal of its contract with Nike on compliance with its supplier code of conduct represents a strong stance for ethical supply chain practices. By taking action amid evidence of poor working conditions and labor abuses at Nike’s contractor, the institution is actively pushing for improved oversight and accountability, which undermines exploitative practices.
Students demand Georgetown University cut Nike contract amid reports of supply chain abuses
+70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 28
The protest and subsequent administrative decision highlight the university’s commitment to upholding labor rights and ensuring fair treatment of workers in its supply chain. This move is aligned with progressive, anti-authoritarian values by pushing back against labor abuses and demanding accountability from corporate partners like Nike.
Students demand Georgetown University cut Nike contract amid reports of supply chain abuses
Alternatives
New Brunswick, USA
38.74

USA
1.10
Boston, USA
-1.27

India
73.09
Ithaca, United States
56.79

Sacramento, United States
43.73

Pasadena, United States
29.82

Kolkata, India
17.75

East Lansing, United States
14.57

Reno, United States
7.43
Industries
- 541110
- Offices of Lawyers
- 611310
- Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
- 611420
- Computer Training