Company Directory - University of Maine System
Company Details - University of Maine System
University of Maine System
WebsiteUSA
The University of Maine System is a public university system in Maine, consisting of several campuses. It is a state-run educational system rather than a traditional for-profit company.
CCI Score
CCI Score: University of Maine System
1.10
Latest Event
UMS Cooperates with Trump Administration on Trans Athlete Policy
Amid federal pressure over Title IX noncompliance in Maine, the University of Maine System cooperated with the Trump administration following a temporary funding pause to ensure that trans athletes do not compete in women's sports.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support UMS by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
OBJECTOR
University of Maine System is currently rated as an Objector.
Latest Events
- MAR282025
Amid federal pressure over Title IX noncompliance in Maine, the University of Maine System cooperated with the Trump administration following a temporary funding pause to ensure that trans athletes do not compete in women's sports.
- MAR192025
The University of Maine System confirmed its adherence to federal Title IX requirements by ensuring that no males participate in women’s sports, following a USDA Title IX compliance review. This decision, highlighted in a USDA press release dated March 19, 2025, underscores UMS's commitment to protecting equal opportunities for female athletes.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The University of Maine System’s clear response to the USDA review and its public declaration of compliance with Title IX and the associated Executive Order demonstrates a strong commitment to safeguarding women’s sports and upholding gender equity. This action counters authoritarian impulses by affirming the protection of marginalized groups in the face of politically driven pressures.
University of Maine System Chooses Sanity: Complies with President Trump's Policy
+60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 22
By proactively ensuring compliance with federal regulations and safeguarding equal opportunities in women’s sports, the University of Maine System demonstrates a high standard of ethical responsibility. This approach prioritizes the welfare and rights of female athletes, marking a conscious stand against policies that could otherwise be exploited to undermine gender equity.
University of Maine System Chooses Sanity: Complies with President Trump's Policy
- MAR172025
The University of Maine System, a public educational institution, recently saw its federal funding paused amid political pressure linked to transgender inclusion policies. The funding freeze, imposed by the Trump administration, underscores the challenges faced by institutions that uphold inclusive policies and resist authoritarian directives.
- MAR112025
The University of Maine System had its funding temporarily frozen by the USDA on March 11, 2025, after refusing to exclude trans athletes from girls' sports, in defiance of the Trump administration's executive order. Funding was restored shortly thereafter following confirmation of Title IX compliance, underscoring the system's commitment to inclusive and ethical practices.
- SEP182024
Graduate workers in the University of Maine System have protested inconsistent bargaining practices that undermine meaningful negotiations and fair labor practices.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 22
The University of Maine System has faced criticism for its inconsistent bargaining process with graduate workers. The fact that negotiators lack real decision-making power has led to protests calling for fair treatment and respect for labor rights. This failure to engage in effective collective bargaining undermines the basic human rights and dignity of workers.
UMaine graduate workers union rallies in Orono amid bargaining troubles
- APR102024
UMGWU is pressing the University of Maine System to secure fair wages, healthcare, and housing for its graduate workers. The prolonged bargaining process, marked by delays, counter-proposals, and the use of private security, raises serious concerns about the institution’s commitment to upholding labor rights.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 22
The University of Maine System’s handling of the contract negotiations—with multiple outstanding proposals, reliance on counter-proposals, and the involvement of private security—demonstrates a troubling disregard for the labor rights of its graduate workers. This neglect particularly affects international and marginalized workers, exacerbating food and housing insecurity and undermining ethical responsibility in labor relations.
- AUG022023
The University of Maine System announced its readiness to voluntarily recognize a union for approximately 1,000 graduate student workers. This decision underscores a commitment to fair labor practices and collective bargaining, supporting worker rights and setting a positive example in public sector labor relations.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 22
By voluntarily recognizing the union for its graduate student workers, the University of Maine System is taking an important step in supporting labor rights and equitable working conditions. This move alleviates the need for government intervention and election processes, thereby promoting collective bargaining and safeguarding the welfare of one of its most vulnerable workforces. Such proactive measures are in line with ethical business practices and demonstrate a commitment to upholding human rights in labor relations.
UMaine System ready to recognize union for graduate student workers
- NOV052019
An investigative exposé revealed that the University of Maine System, a public institution, engaged in conservative lobbying efforts and adopted anti-worker policies by blocking pay increases and limiting benefits, actions that have spurred student protests and raised concerns about its political interference and labor rights record.
-55
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The University of Maine System has demonstrated problematic public and political behavior through calculated lobbying to oppose pro-worker legislation. Internal emails and testimony reveal maneuvers designed to provide cover for political allies and suppress labor reforms, reflecting a strategy that undermines democratic accountability.
Students begin organizing against Maine university system’s conservative lobbying
-65
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 22
The system's approach to labor practices has been detrimental to its employees, with measures such as blocking pay increases and restricting benefits for low-paid staff. This anti-worker stance, reflective of an austerity mindset, directly undermines fair labor practices and contributes to a broader political agenda that can embolden authoritarian policies.
Students begin organizing against Maine university system’s conservative lobbying
- JAN172018
The University of Maine System Board of Trustees is considering a policy revision that would limit faculty from using university resources for political activities. Critics argue that these restrictions unnecessarily curtail free speech and academic freedom, echoing authoritarian tactics that undermine democratic discourse.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The proposed policy by UMS to restrict faculty political activity reflects an alarming move towards suppressing free academic expression and democratic debate. By limiting the use of university resources for political communication, the institution risks aligning itself with authoritarian practices that seek to control political discourse and stifle dissent.
Proposed University of Maine System policy unduly restricts faculty political activity
- JAN102018
Controversial policy changes at the University of Maine System to restrict political activity among faculty and staff have raised concerns about free speech suppression and the erosion of academic and labor rights.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The policy restricts political expression and open debate by limiting how and when faculty and staff can engage in political commentary using university resources. This imposition not only undermines academic freedom but also reflects a top-down, authoritarian approach to controlling dissent in an educational setting.
Professors question Maine university system's push to limit political activity
-40
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 22
By imposing restrictions on when and how university employees can engage in political activity—especially during work hours or on university property—the policy infringes on the labor rights of academic professionals. This curtailment interferes with their ability to contribute informed commentary and advocacy, thereby limiting their role in the public good.
Professors question Maine university system's push to limit political activity
Alternatives
Boston, USA
-1.27
Kolkata, India
17.75
East Lansing, United States
14.57
.jpg)
Minneapolis, United States
5.38
Manipal, India
0.00
Providence, United States
-5.10
Berlin, Germany
-12.44
Columbia, United States
-15.90
Oakland, United States
-15.98
Nashville, United States
-26.69
Industries
- 611210
- Junior Colleges
- 611310
- Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
- 611420
- Computer Training