Company Directory - University of Oxford
Company Details - University of Oxford

University of Oxford
WebsiteOxford, United Kingdom
The University of Oxford is a prestigious and historic academic institution in the United Kingdom, renowned for its rigorous scholarly programs, extensive research contributions, and tradition of academic excellence.
CCI Score
CCI Score: University of Oxford
-16.17
Latest Event
Oxford-EIT Strategic Alliance Advances Innovative, Inclusive Research
University of Oxford announced a transformative strategic alliance with the Ellison Institute of Technology, aimed at accelerating collaborative research in areas including AI, healthcare, food security, and clean energy, while also establishing new doctoral training centers and scholarship programs.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
ENABLER
University of Oxford is currently rated as an Enabler.
Latest Events
- DEC032024
University of Oxford announced a transformative strategic alliance with the Ellison Institute of Technology, aimed at accelerating collaborative research in areas including AI, healthcare, food security, and clean energy, while also establishing new doctoral training centers and scholarship programs.
+60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
The alliance demonstrates strong ethical commitment by investing significantly in joint research programs and scholarship initiatives, which promote academic freedom, worker rights in educational settings, and opportunities for marginalized scholars.
+70
Technology and Services Impact
March 29
The partnership leverages advanced technological resources, including supercomputing facilities and cutting-edge labs, to drive research in key areas like artificial intelligence and clean energy. This reflects a commitment to using technology for societal benefit rather than oppressive surveillance, aligning with progressive, anti-authoritarian values.
+50
Economic and Structural Influence
March 29
By establishing new research infrastructures such as the Centre for Doctoral Training in AI and committing substantial capital investments, the alliance fosters a robust structural transformation in the academic research ecosystem. This structural shift supports long-term economic and social benefits, reinforcing progressive educational practices.
- APR302024
An investigation revealed that the University of Oxford accepted a secret £10m donation, allegedly facilitated by the president of Azerbaijan’s sister-in-law. This opaque funding has raised concerns about potential authoritarian influence and money laundering, prompting MPs Margaret Hodge and Robert Buckland to call for greater transparency in university funding.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 29
The University's acceptance of a secret £10m donation, which appears to have ties to an authoritarian regime, undermines transparency and opens the door for undue influence. This lack of disclosure aligns with concerns about enabling authoritarian practices in academic settings, warranting a significant negative score in public and political behavior.
Margaret Hodge and Robert Buckland lead call for transparency on university funding
- APR072024
Reports indicate that Oxford University accepted a £10m donation facilitated by a relative of the president of Azerbaijan and is now seeking a tribunal order to block a Freedom of Information request that would reveal the donor's identity, raising concerns about transparency and potential covert influence.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
March 29
The decision by Oxford University’s leadership to block the FOI request signals an active effort to shield donor identities and maintain opaque funding channels. This executive political engagement undermines public accountability and hints at potential influence from authoritarian-associated donors.
Academics call for transparency over university funding | openDemocracy
-60
Regulatory Capture
March 29
Oxford University's legal action to prevent disclosure of donor information demonstrates an effort to avoid accountability, reflecting traits of regulatory capture. By keeping donor identities secret, the institution risks enabling clandestine influence and undermining structural integrity.
Academics call for transparency over university funding | openDemocracy
- FEB222024
An employment tribunal ruled that the fixed-term contracts used for long-term academic staff at Oxford University were sham, affirming workers' rights and setting a precedent against precarious employment practices in higher education.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 29
The tribunal ruling represents a significant victory for labor rights, addressing the systemic use of precarious, gig-economy-like contracts at Oxford University. This decision, hailed by the University and College Union as a major win, reinforces the importance of fair and secure employment contracts and challenges exploitative labor practices in academia.
Former Oxford University employees win 'sham contract' claim
- FEB222024
A tribunal ruling on February 22, 2024, determined that two former Oxford University lecturers employed on 'sham contracts' should be classified as employees, reinforcing their workplace rights after 15 years of precarious employment. The university is currently reviewing the ruling, while the UCU hailed the decision as a victory against exploitative employment practices in higher education.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 29
The tribunal ruling is a significant win for labor rights as it reclassifies lecturers as employees, ensuring they receive appropriate protections and benefits. This outcome directly challenges exploitative employment practices in academia and supports the broader movement for secure, fair working conditions, aligning with anti-authoritarian and pro-worker standards.
Former Oxford University lecturers win 'sham contracts' claim - BBC
- DEC292023
A union report has sharply criticized the University of Oxford’s Department for Continuing Education for employing a system of short-term contracts that leave academic staff in precarious, insecure positions. The report highlights issues such as low hourly pay below the national living wage, gender and ethnic disparities, and potential risks of poverty among staff. In response, the university announced plans to review and revise its staffing arrangements starting from the academic year 2024-25.
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 29
The union report details the use of precarious and short-term contracts that contribute to job insecurity, low wages, and lack of diversity. These practices disproportionately affect women, ethnic minorities, and disabled staff, aligning with broader concerns about poor labor relations and human rights practices in the institution.
- DEC142023
An investigation revealed that the University of Oxford accepted over £106 million in anonymous donations between 2017 and 2023, with contributions from donors in Azerbaijan, the US, and China. Critics warn this opacity could open the door to undue influence, while Oxford maintains its robust review process ensures academic independence.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
March 29
The revelation of accepting a substantial amount of anonymous donations raises concerns over potential undisclosed political influence and a lack of accountability in decision-making, particularly as some funds originate from states with authoritarian traits.
More than £281m given to top universities by anonymous donors, probe shows
-20
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
The practice of accepting large anonymous donations challenges traditional notions of transparency and ethical funding, thereby risking potential influence over academic priorities despite internal safeguards.
More than £281m given to top universities by anonymous donors, probe shows
-15
Economic and Structural Influence
March 29
The influx of anonymous funds, some from regimes with authoritarian governance, raises issues regarding long-term economic and structural influence on the University's policies and academic direction.
More than £281m given to top universities by anonymous donors, probe shows
- DEC132023
An investigative report by openDemocracy revealed that Oxford University accepted over £106m in anonymous donations, including a controversial £10m gift facilitated by a relative of Azerbaijan’s leader. The university is pursuing legal action to block a Freedom of Information request that would reveal donor identities, raising concerns over transparency and the potential influence of authoritarian-linked funding on academic independence.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 29
The university's legal maneuver to block disclosure of donor identities and its acceptance of large anonymous donations demonstrate a deliberate effort to keep political and funding influences opaque. This behavior can facilitate authoritarian influence by shielding potentially compromising foreign donations.
Russell Group universities accept £281m of anonymous donations in six years
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
By accepting large sums from anonymous donors, Oxford University compromises ethical accountability and transparency. The unclear origin of these funds, especially those linked to authoritarian regimes, undermines ethical standards in higher education funding.
Russell Group universities accept £281m of anonymous donations in six years
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
March 29
Oxford University’s strategy of hiding its donor sources, including funds from regimes with poor human rights records, poses risks of influencing academic policy and undermining institutional integrity, thereby increasing economic and structural vulnerability to authoritarian influence.
Russell Group universities accept £281m of anonymous donations in six years
- NOV052023
Oxford University accepted over £12 million from the Alexander Mosley Charitable Trust, a donation linked to the fascist legacy of the Mosley family. The decision, which led to the naming of a professorship and a student accommodation block in association with the Mosley name, has been widely criticized by Jewish charities, academics, and public figures for undermining the university’s commitment to ethical standards and diversity.
-80
Public and Political Behavior
March 29
The acceptance of a donation from a trust tied to a notorious fascist legacy signals an endorsement of an extremist funding source and damages the institution’s public moral standing. Critics argue that such a decision implicitly supports fascist ideologies, particularly as it conflicts with contemporary commitments to diversity and social justice.
What did Oxford University do with money from a Nazi sympathizer?
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
The donation acceptance raises serious ethical concerns regarding funding policies and the university's moral judgment. By prioritizing financial contributions over ethical boundaries, Oxford risks compromising its standards on diversity and inclusion, attracting criticism from both academic peers and community groups.
What did Oxford University do with money from a Nazi sympathizer?
- OCT012023
The University of Oxford and the Ellison Institute of Technology (EIT) announced a long‑term strategic alliance with an overall investment of £130m to drive collaborative research in health, sustainable agriculture, climate change, and AI. The partnership includes the establishment of cutting‑edge research facilities, new scholarship programmes, and a Centre for Doctoral Training in Artificial Intelligence.
+70
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
This strategic alliance channels a significant investment into ethical research and academic innovation. By funding initiatives that address healthcare, food security, climate change, and sustainable agriculture, the partnership reinforces progressive business practices and the ethical responsibility of academia and industry to serve society.
+60
Technology and Services Impact
March 29
The alliance emphasizes transformative research in areas such as artificial intelligence, clean energy, and innovative technology development. This focus on harnessing technology for the public good demonstrates a commitment to ensuring that technological impacts support progressive social and environmental outcomes, countering potential authoritarian uses of technology.
+50
Public and Political Behavior
March 29
The alliance not only bolsters academic research but also promotes progressive public engagement through initiatives like government innovation in the age of AI. This suggests an investment in socially responsible public and political behavior that strengthens democratic and open scientific inquiry.
- NOV162022
Two academics have initiated legal proceedings against the University of Oxford, alleging that the institution misclassified them as gig economy workers on insecure personal service contracts, denying them fundamental workers' rights including fair pay, holiday entitlement, and union protections. The lawsuit claims that these actions undermine the legal obligations owed to long-term academic staff.
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 29
The lawsuit alleges that Oxford misclassified long-term academic employees as gig workers, thereby denying them essential labor rights such as fair remuneration, legal holiday pay, and protection for union activity. This practice, which appears to target vulnerable workers and undermine collective bargaining efforts, is indicative of exploitative labor practices that conflict with progressive labor standards.
UK - Two academics sue Oxford University over their employment status
- NOV132021
A Bloomberg op‐ed critiques the University of Oxford for historically accepting funds associated with fascist dynasties, raising questions about its ability to distance itself from controversial benefactors and redeem its moral legacy.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
The article highlights concerns that Oxford University has benefited from bequests tied to figures linked to fascism, implying a neglect of ethical responsibility. This reliance on tainted funding reflects poorly on the institution’s business practices and ethical standards, potentially legitimizing a fascist legacy within its financial and cultural framework.
- NOV102021
Jewish charities condemned Oxford University for accepting donations from the Mosley family, labeling the contribution as 'fascist cash' and calling for the removal of the Mosley name from a professorship amid serious ethical and political concerns.
-80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 29
Oxford University's decision to accept donations from the Mosley family—historically associated with fascist ideologies—signals a problematic endorsement of far‑right influences, eliciting strong condemnation from Jewish charities.
Jewish charities condemn Oxford University for accepting 'fascist cash'
-70
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
By accepting funding from donors linked to fascist legacies, Oxford University raises ethical concerns regarding its funding practices and academic integrity, suggesting a compromising stance that aligns with far‑right financial interests.
Jewish charities condemn Oxford University for accepting 'fascist cash'
- NOV062021
The University of Oxford, along with St Peter's and Lady Margaret Hall colleges, accepted a total of £12 million in donations from trusts associated with the Mosley family—linked to a historical fascist legacy. The decision has sparked intense criticism from academics, who have decried the move as a moral failure and called for student-led protests and government intervention.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
March 29
By accepting a donation from a trust tied to a family with clear fascist affiliations, the University of Oxford has exposed itself to accusations of complicity with far‑right legacy. Critics argue that the decision undermines the institution’s moral authority and sends a troubling signal about its public and political priorities.
Oxford professor says student activists should launch 'Mosley Must Fall' campaign
-30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 29
The ethical approval process for the donation was questioned despite claims that the funds underwent rigorous review. Critics maintain that accepting money from a source linked to a fascist legacy represents a moral lapse in business practices and ethical responsibility, raising concerns about reputational risk and compromised values.
Oxford professor says student activists should launch 'Mosley Must Fall' campaign
- FEB052015
Marine Le Pen's scheduled talk at University of Oxford has sparked protests from students and staff, with over 300 signing a petition and calls from political figures to revoke the invitation. Critics argue that hosting a far‐right figure endorses extremist views and undermines the institution's tradition of tolerance.
-80
Public and Political Behavior
March 29
University of Oxford's decision to host Marine Le Pen—whose history is marred by Islamophobia and ties to fascist rhetoric—provides a platform for extremist views. This action led to widespread protests and petitions from the academic community, reflecting a public and political stance that can be perceived as enabling authoritarian ideologies.
Marine le Pen appearance at University of Oxford sparks anti-fascism protests
Alternatives

London, United Kingdom
-4.44

Berkeley, United States
68.46

Stanford, United States
33.24

Columbus, USA
8.73
Calgary, Canada
8.11

Montreal, Canada
5.29

Pullman, United States
1.17

East Lansing, United States
0.65

Davis, United States
-9.79

Durham, USA
-13.05
Industries
- 611310
- Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
- 611699
- All Other Miscellaneous Schools and Instruction
- 541710
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences