Company Directory - Landbridge Group
Company Details - Landbridge Group

Landbridge Group
WebsiteChina
Landbridge Group is a Chinese-owned company specializing in logistics and transportation services. It is notably known for owning the Port of Darwin in Australia, which plays a critical role in enhancing trade between Australia and Asia. The company aims to strengthen the supply chain and improve port operations to serve the increasing demands of global trade.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Landbridge Group
-28.50
-2.87%
Latest Event
Government Action to Eject Landbridge from Port of Darwin
The Albanese government is moving to enforce its election promise by taking steps to remove Chinese-owned Landbridge Group from the Port of Darwin. The decision is based on politically charged national security concerns despite a lack of clear evidence linking Landbridge to any security threat, suggesting that the move is driven more by anti-China sentiment than objective risk assessment.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
ACCOMPLICE
Landbridge Group is currently rated as an Accomplice.
Latest Events
- JUN032025
The Albanese government is moving to enforce its election promise by taking steps to remove Chinese-owned Landbridge Group from the Port of Darwin. The decision is based on politically charged national security concerns despite a lack of clear evidence linking Landbridge to any security threat, suggesting that the move is driven more by anti-China sentiment than objective risk assessment.
- MAY262025
A US private equity firm is poised to make an offer to purchase the Port of Darwin from its Chinese owner, Landbridge Group, amid escalating concerns over the influence of authoritarian regimes.
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
June 3
Landbridge Group's ownership of the strategically significant Darwin Port has drawn US attention due to concerns that its Chinese ties could facilitate authoritarian influence over critical infrastructure. This geopolitical pressure underscores negative perceptions of the company’s structural role in supporting systems aligned with authoritarian regimes.
- DEC012024
The Northern Territory government has initiated a review of the Port of Darwin lease after Landbridge Group's 2023-24 annual report revealed a loss exceeding $22 million and significant debt. The scrutiny centers on concerns over the company's financial health and the strategic importance of the port, which has previously attracted international criticism.
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
June 3
The financial mismanagement indicated by a loss exceeding $22 million and long-standing debt raises serious concerns regarding Landbridge Group's business practices and ethical responsibility. Such instability in managing a critical infrastructure asset undermines confidence and may open pathways for further exploitative practices.
Port of Darwin's Chinese Operator Comes Under Financial Scrutiny
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
June 3
The review of a 99-year lease for the strategically important Port of Darwin amid significant financial distress exposes vulnerabilities in economic and structural governance. Unresolved financial instability combined with the critical nature of the asset may risk enhanced foreign influence and undermine national security oversight.
Port of Darwin's Chinese Operator Comes Under Financial Scrutiny
- OCT202023
Landbridge Group expressed satisfaction with the outcome of the Darwin Port lease review, stating that there are no security concerns despite reported links to the People’s Liberation Army. This statement comes amid ongoing controversy over the strategic implications of the lease and political criticism regarding the potential influence of authoritarian ties.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
June 3
Landbridge Group’s affirmation of the lease, despite credible concerns about its links to the People’s Liberation Army, reflects a dismissal of security risks and contributes to a normalization of potentially compromising foreign influence in critical infrastructure. This stance, taken without addressing the underlying concerns raised by politicians and security experts, earns a negative score under Public and Political Behavior.
Federal government will not cancel Chinese company Landbridge's Port of Darwin lease
- OCT202023
After a government security review ruled out major concerns, Landbridge Group defended its 99‐year lease at the Port of Darwin by dismissing claims linking it to Chinese state control. The company argued that the criticisms were based on myths and mistruths, emphasizing that its ownership structure does not equate to control by the Chinese government.
+0
Public and Political Behavior
June 3
Landbridge Group’s public response involved rejecting security allegations without taking tangible anti-fascist measures. While the company defended its lease and distanced itself from state control claims, the defense was largely reactive and did not include proactive policies to promote transparency or social responsibility. This yields a neutral score from a public and political behavior perspective.
- AUG292022
Landbridge Group, owner of Darwin Port's 99-year lease, rejected claims that its operations are influenced by the Chinese government. In an interview, a board member emphasized that daily operations are managed by Australian staff in partnership with the NT government, distancing the company from authoritarian control.
+20
Public and Political Behavior
June 3
By publicly rejecting the notion that it is under Chinese government control and emphasizing its independent management and partnership with a democratically accountable Northern Territory government, Landbridge Group counters narratives that suggest authoritarian influence. This stance supports democratic oversight and challenges the use of politically charged allegations.
Chinese-owned company Landbridge rejects 'myths and mistruths' about Darwin Port lease
Alternatives

United Kingdom
46.19

Corporation
49.87

Corporation
-37.93

Chicago, United States
-3.34

Greenwich, United States
-3.69

Hedehusene, Denmark
-10.44

North Kansas City, United States
-13.53
Geneva, Switzerland
-24.46

San Francisco, United States
-24.91

Copenhagen, Denmark
-27.97
Industries
- 488320
- Marine Cargo Handling
- 493110
- General Warehousing and Storage
- 541614
- Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services