Company Directory - Facebook
Company Details - Facebook
.svg){kind=logo}
Facebook is a social media platform that allows users to connect with friends, share content, and engage with various features.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Facebook
-45.60
0.03%
Latest Event
Allegations of Supply Chain Human Rights Violations involving Meta (Facebook)
A Forbes Business Council article highlights that major companies including Meta (Facebook) have faced allegations related to forced labor and human trafficking within their supply chains. The commentary emphasizes the failure of some companies to implement robust human rights due diligence and proper supply chain oversight.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
QUISLING
Facebook is currently rated as a Quisling.
Latest Events
- DEC222023
A Forbes Business Council article highlights that major companies including Meta (Facebook) have faced allegations related to forced labor and human trafficking within their supply chains. The commentary emphasizes the failure of some companies to implement robust human rights due diligence and proper supply chain oversight.
-50
Supply Chain Ethics
March 27
The Forbes article connects Meta (Facebook) with broader concerns about supply chain ethics by noting allegations of forced labor and human trafficking. This indicates a significant lapse in human rights due diligence and ethical sourcing practices. Given the serious implications of using exploitative labor practices, the company’s performance in this area is rated negatively.
Human Rights In The Supply Chain: Can We Learn From Our Mistakes?
- DEC312021
Facebook spent over $20 million on lobbying in 2021, breaking its own record and signaling an aggressive push to influence political outcomes amid a period of intense scrutiny and political crisis. This massive expenditure raises concerns about the company's role in shaping legislative policies that may favor authoritarian practices.
-80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 27
Facebook's record lobbying expenditure exceeding $20 million in 2021 demonstrates a deliberate effort to exert substantial influence over political and legislative processes. From a left-leaning perspective, such massive lobbying spending can be seen as bolstering corporate power and enabling policies that support authoritarian interests at the expense of democratic accountability.
Facebook's lobbying spending surged to a record in 2021 - POLITICO
- DEC312021
An analysis of Facebook's compliance with censorship requests from authoritarian regimes, including actions in Vietnam and India, which highlight the company's prioritization of revenue over free speech and democratic principles.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
March 27
Facebook has been complicit in curbing free speech by adhering to censorship demands from authoritarian governments. The company's actions, as highlighted by compliance with directives in Vietnam and India, undermine democratic values and the public's right to information.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 27
Facebook's business practices show a prioritization of profit, particularly in lucrative authoritarian markets, at the expense of ethical responsibility. The reliance on revenue from regimes that enforce strict censorship has compromised the company's commitment to democratic accountability and ethical standards.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
-50
Technology and Services Impact
March 27
The company's platform practices, including inconsistent content moderation and compliance with authoritarian censorship demands, enable repressive governments to silence dissent and control the flow of information. This raises concerns about the role of technology in facilitating authoritarian control.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
-20
Economic and Structural Influence
March 27
Economically, Facebook benefits significantly from revenue in markets where authoritarian regimes operate, such as Vietnam. This financial entanglement may weaken the company’s incentives to uphold democratic values, as economic interests override structural commitments to free expression.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
- OCT212021
In Q3 2021, Facebook's lobbying spending reached $5.1 million, marking one of its highest spending quarters. This extensive investment in lobbying on issues such as antitrust, misinformation, and content moderation raises concerns about its influence on democratic processes during a period of intense scrutiny following whistleblower testimonies.
-70
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 27
Facebook's significant lobbying expenditure of $5.1M, as reported by Politico, demonstrates its deep engagement in influencing policy decisions at a time when democratic oversight is under threat. The company's aggressive lobbying efforts, which include hiring firms linked to high-level political figures, highlight its commitment to shaping regulatory outcomes in its favor. Such actions can undermine public accountability and contribute to a political environment conducive to authoritarian practices.
Facebook lobbying surges to $5M amid whistleblower uproar - POLITICO
- JAN222021
Facebook spent $19.68 million on lobbying in 2020, more than any other Big Tech company. This aggressive lobbying, aimed at influencing policies on issues ranging from election integrity to content regulation, raises concerns about the company’s role in shaping political outcomes in a manner that could support authoritarian practices.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 27
Facebook's heavy lobbying expenditure in 2020, spending more than any other for the period, is indicative of its active engagement in influencing political outcomes. This use of corporate funds to sway policy debates and secure favorable conditions is seen as complicity in bolstering an environment where corporate power overrides democratic accountability, a hallmark of authoritarian influence.
Facebook spent more on lobbying than any other Big Tech company in 2020
- DEC312020
The article details how Facebook has repeatedly complied with censorship demands from authoritarian governments in countries such as Vietnam and India, thereby undermining free expression and aiding oppressive regimes.
-65
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 27
Facebook’s business model, which emphasizes profit—evidenced by its booming revenue in markets like Vietnam—leads to ethical compromises, as seen in its underinvestment in transparent and rights-focused content moderation.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
-60
Technology and Services Impact
March 27
The platform's content moderation algorithms and policies have been adjusted to comply with state-imposed censorship, inadvertently providing technological support to authoritarian regimes and stifling free speech.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
March 27
Facebook’s heavy financial reliance on revenue from authoritarian markets, combined with minimal investment in safeguarding free speech in these regions, reflects a structural influence that indirectly supports oppressive regimes.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
-75
Public and Political Behavior
March 27
Facebook’s adherence to censorship directives, including removal of thousands of posts in Vietnam as demanded by repressive regimes, shows a willingness to prioritize political expediency over democratic principles, rendering its public political behavior complicit in authoritarian repression.
The Facebook Papers: How Authoritarian Governments Are Pressuring Platforms to Stifle Free Speech
- JUN122020
Facebook pitched a new feature enabling employers to suppress words like 'unionize' in workplace chat, raising serious concerns over its commitment to labor rights and the protection of worker organizing efforts.
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 27
Facebook's proposal of a tool designed to allow employers to blacklist terms such as 'unionize' directly undermines workers' rights to organize and engage in collective bargaining. This action prioritizes employer control over employee communication and suppresses legitimate labor organizing, contributing to a corporate environment that can facilitate authoritarian practices in the workplace.
- JUN032020
Facebook developed a built-in feature within its Workplace product that would allow employers to suppress discussions on unionization, effectively undermining workers' rights and the ability to organize.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
October 1
Facebook's design of a tool to blacklist union-related words in employee chats within its Workplace product demonstrates a direct effort to suppress unionization and worker organizing. This practice undermines labor rights and supports repressive labor management tactics, aligning the company with authoritarian practices that curtail worker freedoms.
Facebook Designed Tool to Let Employers Suppress Words Like 'Unionize' in Employee Chats
- JUN012020
The United Food & Commercial Workers International Union has condemned Facebook for deploying a tool within Facebook Workplace that censors employee communications about unionizing. This feature enables employers to blacklist keywords like 'unionize', effectively silencing worker efforts to organize and advocate for safer conditions and fair wages during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 27
Facebook's implementation of a censorship tool within its Workplace product directly undermines workers' rights to communicate about unionizing. This action supports a broader pattern of labor rights abuses, as it empowers management to silence employee organizing efforts and stifles the ability of workers to demand fair conditions. Such practices contribute to an environment in which authoritarian corporate power is prioritized over the well-being and rights of the workforce.
Alternatives
Menlo Park, United States
-32.43
Toronto, Canada
29.22
San Francisco, United States
8.36
San Mateo, United States
-7.30
Hangzhou, China
-16.36
Shanghai, China
-19.45
Mountain View, USA
-27.29
Beijing, China
-28.80
Corporation
0.00
Corporation
-14.24
Industries
- 518210
- Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services
- 541511
- Custom Computer Programming Services
- 541613
- Marketing Consulting Services
- 511210
- Software Publishers