The Alex Marlow Show—which features Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel discussing the MAGA agenda—is distributed on Rumble among other conservative outlets, underscoring Rumble’s role in amplifying far‐right narratives.

An analysis of Rumble's role in enabling the distribution of far‐right extremist content through its video platform, as evidenced by its promotion of the Alex Marlow Show which features inflammatory political commentary.

Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the Italian video platform Rumble to be taken offline within 24 hours for failing to comply with multiple legal orders, including appointing legal representation and removing a controversial channel linked to a far‐right journalist. Rumble’s public stance accusing the judge of censorship, along with its ties to politically contentious figures, underscores concerns about its role in fueling political polarization and undermining judicial authority.

On February 19, 2025, Rumble, alongside TRUTH Social, filed a lawsuit in U.S. federal court against Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes to block censorship orders targeting U.S. users. The suit challenges the extraterritorial application of foreign judicial orders and underscores the company’s commitment to protecting free speech under the U.S. Constitution. CEO Chris Pavlovski has publicly decried the authoritarian tactics, emphasizing that American businesses must be governed by U.S. law.

On November 27, 2024, Rumble Inc. filed a lawsuit against the California Attorney General and Secretary of State challenging AB 2655, a law perceived as unconstitutional for punishing political speech. Represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, the company is taking a stand to protect free online expression.

A federal lawsuit was filed by Alliance Defending Freedom on behalf of Rumble and its indirect subsidiary, Rumble Canada, challenging a new California law that mandates large online platforms to censor political commentary. The suit argues that the law forces Rumble to both curb its users' speech and alter its own content, a move seen as a violation of the First Amendment and an act of government overreach.

Rumble has filed a lawsuit against California's Attorney General and Secretary of State over AB 2655, arguing that the law restricts political speech and violates the First Amendment. The company, represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, positions itself as a defender of free expression against governmental censorship, a stance that resonates with democratic values, though its association with a controversial legal partner may cause concern among progressive groups.

Rumble Inc. filed a lawsuit against California's Attorney General and Secretary of State over AB 2655, a law that mandates online platforms to remove or label political content deemed 'materially deceptive.' Represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, Rumble argues that the law infringes on free expression and amounts to government censorship of political speech.

Rumble, along with its subsidiary Rumble Canada, has filed a federal lawsuit against California over new censorship laws that require the platform to remove political content deemed harmful to electoral prospects. The lawsuit contends that these laws force Rumble to alter its own speech and censor user content, violating the First Amendment.

Rumble released a video titled 'Lobbying and the Influence on American Policy' that examines how powerful lobbying groups, including foreign actors, impact U.S. policy and democratic processes. The content reflects a critical stance on the opaque nature of political lobbying and its influence on legislation and public opinion.

On May 13, 2024, Rumble Inc. announced that it has filed its second lawsuit against Google, alleging monopolistic and anticompetitive practices within the digital advertising ecosystem. The suit contends that Google has engaged in exclusionary practices by monopolizing various segments of its ad tech stack, thereby harming competition and extracting supracompetitive fees.

Rumble's CEO, Chris Pavlovski, is set to testify before Congress regarding international censorship demands from governments including France, Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand. In challenging these government-imposed restrictions, the company positions itself as a defender of the fundamental right to free speech and democratic values.

Rumble has introduced a new feature on its platform that allows channels affiliated with U.S. federal candidates to receive livestream 'tips' that count as campaign contributions. This move centralizes political financing on the platform, raising concerns about corporate facilitation of political influence and the potential empowerment of candidates with authoritarian leanings.

On January 18, 2024, Rumble announced a new feature that allows channels affiliated with U.S. federal political candidates to receive livestream 'tips' which count as official campaign contributions. The feature includes compliance measures requiring contributors to provide identifying details to ensure transparency and adherence to federal disclosure laws.

Rumble announced a new feature allowing candidate-affiliated channels to receive tips during live streams that count as federal campaign contributions. While touted as a move to engage politically diverse audiences, this mechanism raises concerns about bypassing traditional regulatory oversight and facilitating unregulated political influence.

A federal district court in California rejected Google's motion to dismiss Rumble's lawsuit alleging that Google's monopolistic, anti-competitive practices hinder fair competition in the online video market. This decision enables Rumble to enter the discovery phase and pursue evidence of algorithm manipulation that has favored YouTube over competitors.