Company Directory - BlackRock Investment Management, LLC
Company Details - BlackRock Investment Management, LLC
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC
WebsiteNew York, United States
ISIN: US09247X1019
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC is an investment management entity and a subsidiary of BlackRock, Inc. It offers a range of asset management and investment advisory services to institutional and individual investors worldwide.
CCI Score
CCI Score: BlackRock Investment Management, LLC
-31.21
0.01%
Latest Event
BlackRock involved in strategic US-UAE investment partnership amid authoritarian ties
BlackRock, Inc. participated in a high-profile partnership announcement involving a $1.4 trillion investment framework aimed at bolstering US tech, energy, and manufacturing sectors. The event, held during a meeting with President Trump and UAE officials, raises concerns about reinforcing authoritarian political influence and economic power accumulation.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- MAR222025
BlackRock, Inc. participated in a high-profile partnership announcement involving a $1.4 trillion investment framework aimed at bolstering US tech, energy, and manufacturing sectors. The event, held during a meeting with President Trump and UAE officials, raises concerns about reinforcing authoritarian political influence and economic power accumulation.
- MAR222025
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink orchestrated a high-stakes deal to take over key ports at the Panama Canal, an action that pleased President Trump but raised serious concerns regarding political alignment and authoritarian complicity. The deal, which bypassed expected regulatory and diplomatic channels, has drawn criticism over its potential to prioritize profit over national interests and to bolster relationships with authoritarian-affiliated political figures.
- MAR202025
BlackRock, Inc. has become part of a coalition with Microsoft and other major players to build a $30 billion portfolio of data centers and artificial intelligence infrastructure. The move, highlighted by the appointment of a BlackRock executive to the board of the AI startup xAI, raises concerns about the company's blending of corporate influence with political-economic power, potentially fueling structures that may support authoritarian agendas.
- MAR192025
A BlackRock-led initiative to acquire strategic ports, including those at the Panama Canal, has raised concerns over potential political manipulation and regulatory capture amid broader geopolitical tensions.
- JAN012025
An analysis of BlackRock’s political contributions via PACs and executive engagements, its reversal of ESG/DEI policies, and its broader economic influence which may facilitate authoritarian tendencies.
-35
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
BlackRock’s maintenance of a Political Action Committee (PAC) that donates bipartisan amounts, combined with executive contributions, indicates significant political influence. This practice raises concerns regarding corporate involvement in political processes that can indirectly support authoritarian policies by influencing legislation and regulation.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
In January 2025, BlackRock reversed several of its previously championed progressive ESG and DEI initiatives, notably withdrawing from the Net Zero Asset Managers and removing DEI references from its reports. This shift undermines ethical business practices and social responsibility priorities that are key to resisting authoritarian and oppressive policies.
+20
Technology and Services Impact
March 26
BlackRock’s use of its proprietary risk management technology, Aladdin, demonstrates a strong technological infrastructure that supports financial stability. From an anti-fascist perspective, the technology itself poses minimal direct risks of enabling repressive measures.
-40
Economic and Structural Influence
March 26
BlackRock’s significant involvement in no-bid contracts, its advisory roles during financial crises, and its influence over economic policies illustrate its capacity to shape market and regulatory environments. Such economic collaboration and potential regulatory capture can compromise public welfare and democratic controls.
- NOV212024
BlackRock faces an OECD complaint alleging its investments in agribusiness are contributing to environmental devastation and human rights abuses, impacting indigenous communities and destabilizing global climate efforts.
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
BlackRock has been accused of channeling investments into companies implicated in environmental destruction and human rights abuses, calling into question its commitment to ethical business practices. The evidence suggests that its investment strategies are complicit in supporting activities that contribute to global climate destabilization and harm to traditional communities.
BlackRock accused of contributing to climate and human rights abuses
-40
Economic and Structural Influence
March 26
Given BlackRock's immense influence in managing over $11 trillion in assets, its investment decisions have far-reaching economic and structural impacts. The allegations suggest that its financial practices indirectly bolster industries with disruptive environmental and social practices, thus warranting a negative score in Economic and Structural Influence.
BlackRock accused of contributing to climate and human rights abuses
- NOV212024
An OECD complaint alleges that BlackRock’s increasing investments in companies implicated in environmental devastation and human rights abuses are contributing to climate change and the violation of traditional communities' rights.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
BlackRock is being criticized for channeling investments into agribusiness companies that have been linked to environmental devastation and the violation of human rights, as highlighted by an OECD complaint. These practices undermine ethical business conduct and contribute to systemic environmental and social harm.
BlackRock accused of contributing to climate and human rights abuses
-40
Economic and Structural Influence
March 26
Due to its enormous influence in global asset management, BlackRock is seen as reinforcing economic structures that indirectly support exploitative practices. Its vast control over investment flows contributes to systemic issues, including environmental degradation and the marginalization of vulnerable communities.
BlackRock accused of contributing to climate and human rights abuses
- NOV202024
A complaint has been filed against BlackRock for increasing investments in companies linked to deforestation and human rights violations. Despite public statements on the importance of natural capital and human rights, BlackRock's investments in agribusiness companies implicated in environmental devastation have raised severe concerns. Indigenous groups and environmental organizations argue that BlackRock’s actions violate OECD guidelines and amount to greenwashing.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
BlackRock has long touted its commitment to managing risks related to climate and human rights. However, the stark discrepancy between its public statements and its investment practices – continuing to funnel billions into companies involved in deforestation and human rights abuses – reflects a failure in accountability and transparency, undermining its public and political legitimacy.
New complaint against BlackRock over deforestation and human rights abuses
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
The complaint highlights BlackRock's significant investments – over $5 billion – in companies with documented histories of environmental destruction and human rights violations. By failing to enforce the OECD guidelines on responsible investment and ignoring repeated outreach from indigenous groups, BlackRock demonstrates a profound neglect of its business practices and ethical responsibilities.
New complaint against BlackRock over deforestation and human rights abuses
- NOV202024
A complaint has been filed with the U.S. State Department’s National Contact Point for Responsible Business Conduct, alleging that BlackRock, through its investments in companies linked to deforestation and human rights abuses, has failed to adhere to OECD guidelines on environmental stewardship and the protection of indigenous rights.
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
BlackRock, as one of the world’s largest asset managers, is under fire for investing over $5 billion in companies with evidence of causing deforestation and violating human rights, particularly indigenous land rights. Despite its public statements regarding natural capital, the firm has not taken adequate measures to mitigate or monitor the significant risks associated with these investments. This neglect calls into question its commitment to ethical business practices and corporate responsibility.
New complaint against BlackRock over deforestation and human rights abuses
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The complaint further highlights BlackRock’s failure to protect indigenous communities and uphold human rights standards. Indigenous groups and environmental activists argue that by financing companies that engage in land grabbing, deforestation, and violence against human rights defenders, BlackRock is indirectly enabling exploitative labor and human rights practices.
New complaint against BlackRock over deforestation and human rights abuses
- NOV202024
Friends of the Earth, along with the Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil (APIB), filed an OECD complaint accusing BlackRock of driving environmental destruction and human rights abuses through its investments in agribusiness companies.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
BlackRock’s lack of proactive measures to divest from or regulate investments in agribusiness companies causing deforestation, biodiversity loss, and indigenous rights violations reflects irresponsible public and political behavior. Their failure to uphold international guidelines underscores a broader negligence in corporate accountability.
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
BlackRock’s continued investment in agribusiness companies known for causing ecological destruction, gross human rights abuses, and violations of international standards demonstrates a significant failure in business practices and ethical responsibility. The complaint emphasizes that despite longstanding warnings and evidence, BlackRock persists in financing operations that contribute directly to climate collapse and social injustice.
- NOV052024
During an October 21 conference, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink stated that it 'really doesn’t matter' who wins the US presidential election, reflecting a dismissive stance towards democratic electoral accountability and hinting at the firm's deep-rooted ties with political elites and government agencies.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
March 18
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink’s remarks, as reported, demonstrate a stark disregard for the democratic process by asserting that the outcome of the election is inconsequential because both administrations serve Wall Street. This feeds into fears of entrenched corporate influence over political decision-making, thereby facilitating policies that favor authoritarian and oligarchic power structures.
-40
Economic Collaboration
March 18
The report also underscores BlackRock's deep structural influence in the US economy through its revolving door with government agencies and its role as a key asset manager. This interconnectedness suggests a level of economic collaboration that can underwrite policies detrimental to public welfare, reinforcing systemic inequalities and undermining democratic accountability.
- OCT262024
BlackRock's affiliates made significant donations to Democratic political candidates during the 2024 election cycle. This move is viewed positively as it supports progressive, anti-authoritarian forces and bolsters resistance to rising fascism, contrary to support for authoritarian practices.
+60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
October 26
BlackRock’s affiliates contributed over $637,065 to Democrat candidates, a move that is seen as backing progressive political efforts and opposing authoritarian tendencies. This financial support helps counter the rising influence of far-right ideologies by empowering candidates aligned with democratic values and anti-fascist principles.
- OCT262024
BlackRock affiliates have made notable contributions to support Democratic candidates during the election cycle. While on the surface these donations appear to back parties opposing authoritarianism, the use of indirect channels to funnel substantial funds raises concerns about corporate influence, lack of transparency, and undue political power that can ultimately undermine democratic accountability.
-30
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
The article details how BlackRock's affiliates have been channeling large political contributions to Democratic candidates. Although supporting candidates who oppose authoritarian policies might seem positive from an anti-fascist perspective, the method adopted—using affiliated entities instead of direct donations—signals a problematic exercise of corporate power over the political process. This indirect influence raises concerns about transparency and the potential for prioritizing corporate interests over genuine democratic accountability.
- MAY072024
A recent CPA investigation details how BlackRock funnels billions in U.S. investment funds to companies with direct links to the Chinese Communist Party and military, including firms involved in nuclear weapons and human rights abuses against minority groups such as the Uyghurs. This financial entanglement raises serious concerns about BlackRock’s role in economically supporting authoritarian regimes.
- APR182024
An investigation revealed that BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, invested approximately $1.9 billion in PRC companies flagged for advancing military capabilities and supporting human rights abuses. This financial engagement is seen as economic collaboration with an authoritarian regime, contributing to the CCP’s repressive practices.
-80
Economic Collaboration
March 18
BlackRock's substantial investment in PRC companies—despite these companies being red-flagged for advancing military efforts and perpetrating human rights abuses—positions the firm as complicit in channeling funds to bolster authoritarian regimes. This economic collaboration not only supports the CCP's repressive apparatus but also undermines efforts to promote transparency and human rights globally.
- NOV172023
In response to growing regulatory and political pressures ahead of a US presidential election year, BlackRock is overhauling its public policy team by hiring new lobbyists and restructuring its government affairs unit. Critics argue that these moves are intended to strengthen corporate influence over policy, thereby deepening the firm's complicity in processes that may ultimately support authoritarian practices.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
BlackRock’s decision to expand and reshape its lobbying unit is viewed negatively from an anti-fascist and left-leaning perspective. By reinforcing its public policy arm through the addition of lobbyists, BlackRock is increasing its capacity to influence regulatory and governmental decisions. This action can be interpreted as an effort to secure favorable conditions for the company amid a politically divisive environment, potentially aiding in the propagation of policies that weaken democratic oversight and bolster authoritarian practices.
BlackRock Is Hiring New Lobbyists, Reshaping Public Policy Team ...
- OCT052023
BlackRock is overhauling its employee complaints policies following an external review and allegations of workplace misconduct. This reform is aimed at enhancing labor practices and ensuring better protection and responsiveness to employee concerns.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The improvement in employee complaints policies reflects a positive change in BlackRock’s labor relations and human rights practices. This step suggests the company is addressing internal misconduct issues and enhancing protection for workers, which is a crucial move against oppressive business practices. From an anti-fascist perspective, prioritizing worker rights helps counteract exploitative corporate behavior.
BlackRock commits to improving employee complaints policies | Pensions & Investments
- OCT152022
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC has made record political contributions through its PAC, significantly influencing US political campaigns by donating record sums to both Democrats and Republicans. The company's high-level executive political actions further blur the line between corporate interests and democratic processes, raising concerns over its involvement in shaping policies that may favor authoritarian dynamics.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
BlackRock’s PAC record spending of $647,000 and continued contributions to a wide array of political figures demonstrate a robust commitment to influencing policy through financial means. Such large-scale political contributions underscore the company's role in shaping an environment where corporate power can undercut democratic accountability, potentially enabling the rise of authoritarian practices.
BlackRock Spends Record on US Political Campaigns as ESG Fight Intensifies
-20
Executive Political Engagement
March 26
Executives at BlackRock, including CEO Larry Fink, have engaged directly in political contributions, indicating a top-level endorsement of political practices that blur corporate interests with partisan politics. This direct executive engagement in funding political campaigns heightens concerns over potential conflicts of interest and the undermining of democratic processes.
BlackRock Spends Record on US Political Campaigns as ESG Fight Intensifies
- OCT072022
On October 7, 2022, BlackRock cast its shareholder vote against a resolution sponsored by the NLPC that would have required Alphabet to disclose government requests for content removal, a move perceived as enabling censorship and indirectly supporting authoritarian practices.
-60
Media Influence and Propaganda
March 18
BlackRock’s decision to vote against a proposal demanding transparency from Alphabet regarding government censorship requests appears to favor corporate interests over public accountability. This move potentially aids repressive practices by shielding Big Tech from scrutiny, thereby indirectly supporting censorship measures that align with authoritarian agendas. The action reflects a concerning trend in the intersection of corporate power and the erosion of democratic oversight.
- OCT072022
BlackRock, the world’s largest investment firm, cast shareholder votes against an NLPC resolution calling for greater transparency in how Big Tech platforms handle government censorship requests. This decision has raised concerns about the firm's stance on promoting open discourse and accountability, potentially aligning with authoritarian practices.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
Under the Public and Political Behavior category, BlackRock’s decision to vote against a proposal that would require transparency in government censorship requests undermines the democratic process and public accountability. This action suggests a reluctance to confront authoritarian practices and maintain open information flows.
-30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
In the realm of Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility, BlackRock’s vote against the transparency measure reflects an ethical lapse. By opposing measures aimed at curtailing opaque censorship practices, BlackRock appears complicit in supporting strategies that could enable authoritarian control and compromise corporate accountability.
- OCT072022
BlackRock cast its shareholder vote against a proposal aimed at ensuring transparency in government requests for censorship. This decision, highlighted in a Newsweek opinion piece, raises concerns about the firm's complicity in enabling authoritarian measures by allowing Big Tech platforms to operate with little accountability.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 18
BlackRock's decision to vote against a transparency proposal regarding how Big Tech handles government censorship requests signals a troubling stance. By not supporting measures that would expose potential abuses, the firm indirectly aids in the environment that facilitates authoritarian censorship. This action undermines democratic norms and encourages opaque political behavior.
- OCT072022
BlackRock, one of the world's largest asset management firms, received criticism for casting shareholder votes against a resolution aimed at increasing transparency regarding government censorship pressures on Big Tech. This vote is seen as indirectly supporting authoritarian practices by undermining democratic accountability and free speech.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
BlackRock's decision to vote against a shareholder resolution that would have mandated transparency on how social media platforms handle government censorship requests reflects a concerning lack of commitment to democratic accountability. This action can be interpreted as enabling corporate strategies that align with authoritarian suppression of free speech.
-65
Media Influence and Propaganda
March 26
By opposing measures designed to force Big Tech companies to disclose details regarding censorship requests from government agencies, BlackRock indirectly contributes to an environment where corporate and governmental interests can collude to control media narratives. This undermines free speech and aligns with authoritarian practices, reflecting negatively on the firm's impact on technological and media influences.
- JAN012022
BlackRock disclosed a significant increase in its federal lobbying expenditures in 2022—spending $2.38 million, a 63% rise from the previous year, and over doubling payments to prominent lobbying firms. This aggressive spending raises serious concerns about the company’s political influence and its potential role in shaping policies in ways that may support authoritarian practices.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
BlackRock's substantial increase in federal lobbying expenditures is indicative of a deliberate strategy to influence government policy, particularly in an environment where anti-ESG sentiment is rising. This financial engagement in lobbying underscores an alignment with practices that can erode democratic accountability and foster authoritarian impulses, as corporate money is used to potentially dampen progressive and socially responsible reforms.
BlackRock steps up spending on US lobbying in face of anti-ESG attacks
- JAN012022
The article examines BlackRock's deep ties with the U.S. government, highlighting how its leadership and position as a major asset manager contribute to the government’s influence over public corporations and raise concerns about democratic accountability.
-35
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
BlackRock’s integration into governmental influence channels, as highlighted in the article, points to a concerning overlap between corporate power and state authority. This relationship enables the government to indirectly steer policy and corporate governance, undermining independent corporate decision‐making and contributing to authoritarian dynamics.
-30
Executive Political Engagement
March 26
The article underscores the role of BlackRock's leadership, particularly CEO Larry Fink, in maintaining close ties with the government. This close executive engagement raises serious questions about the potential for corporate executives to drive policy decisions that favor authoritarian practices, compromising democratic accountability.
- MAR012021
BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has publicly urged companies to implement robust human rights policies and board-level oversight to mitigate labor abuses and supply chain risks. By highlighting potential legal, regulatory, and reputational repercussions of poor human rights management, BlackRock is taking a proactive stand against practices that can indirectly support authoritarian and fascist regimes.
+75
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
BlackRock’s public advocacy for enhanced human rights oversight demonstrates a commitment to ethical leadership. Their insistence on board-level scrutiny and transparency in addressing human rights risks counters corporate behaviors that can embolden authoritarian practices. This proactive stance in public and political behavior earns a high positive score.
BlackRock Pushes Companies on Human Rights Risks : TheCorporateCounsel.net Blog
+85
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
By emphasizing the need for companies to address issues such as poor working conditions, forced labor, and inadequate supply chain practices, BlackRock sets a strong ethical standard for labor relations and human rights practices. This move not only protects vulnerable workers but also challenges business practices that might otherwise contribute to systemic exploitation and authoritarian control.
BlackRock Pushes Companies on Human Rights Risks : TheCorporateCounsel.net Blog
- JAN282021
Public pension fund officials pressured BlackRock to disclose its political contributions after revelations that its PAC donated $85,000 to Republicans who later denied the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. This has raised concerns over BlackRock's role in financially supporting political actors that may undermine democratic norms and facilitate authoritarian tendencies.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 18
BlackRock's political contribution through its PAC, which involved a donation of $85,000 to Republicans who subsequently denied the outcome of a free and fair election, raises serious concerns. The call by public pension officials for greater transparency underscores the view that such financial practices potentially align the firm with actors who contribute to the erosion of democratic processes, thereby bolstering authoritarian inclinations.
- SEP232020
A report examining BlackRock's stewardship framework and its alignment with internationally recognized labor rights standards raises serious concerns regarding the protection of workers' rights.
-25
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The report from Workers Capital spotlights deficiencies in BlackRock's stewardship framework in protecting labor rights. The evaluation suggests that BlackRock's practices do not fully align with international standards such as the ILO Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, raising concerns over its commitment to uphold fundamental labor rights. This poor performance in safeguarding workers’ rights is seen as a negative indicator of ethical responsibility in a climate where labor rights are key to resisting authoritarian economic practices.
Spotlight on BlackRock: The Role of Fundamental Labour Rights in Investment Stewardship
- JAN012020
Despite joining the UN Global Compact in 2020 and pledging to uphold human rights, BlackRock continues to invest in companies accused of undermining human and Indigenous rights. This disconnect between public commitment and investment practices raises serious ethical concerns about its business practices.
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
BlackRock's overall business practices are called into question as the firm continues to invest in companies associated with human rights violations, undermining its public commitment to support ethical standards through the UN Global Compact.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The firm's endorsement of investment practices that support companies implicated in infringing on human and Indigenous rights severely undermines its credibility in upholding labor and human rights standards, reflecting a troubling disregard for social responsibility.
Alternatives
Boston, United States
-26.11
Corporation
2.28
Corporation
-37.37
Los Angeles, United States
5.74
New York, United States
-22.96
%20.svg.png)
New York City, United States
-45.96
New York, United States
-54.19
Singapore, Singapore
18.71
Singapore, Singapore
0.00
St. Petersburg, USA
-0.71
Industries
- 523910
- Miscellaneous Intermediation
- 523999
- Miscellaneous Financial Investment Activities
- 525920
- Trusts, Estates, and Agency Accounts
- 541611
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- 523930
- Investment Advice
- 523920
- Portfolio Management
