The American Automotive Policy Council issued a statement urging that the recently announced 25% tariffs on foreign-made auto parts be implemented in a manner that avoids raising consumer prices and preserves the competitiveness of the North American automotive sector. This public stance comes amid President Trump’s comments minimizing concerns over potential price hikes, highlighting the AAPC’s call for careful policy design to protect consumers.

Following Trump’s announcement of new auto tariffs, the American Automotive Policy Council expressed support for the administration’s vision. In a statement, AAPC emphasized the importance of implementing tariffs in a manner that avoids consumer price hikes, signaling alignment with policies that may bolster authoritarian priorities in trade and industry.

AAPC President Matt Blunt issued a statement endorsing President Trump's vision on automotive tariffs and increased U.S. production, effectively aligning the council with policies that bolster authoritarian economic agendas. The statement implies support for measures that may undermine democratic debate over tariff imposition.

The OpenSecrets profile for the American Automotive Policy Council reveals significant lobbying expenditure of $315,000 in 2024 and a revolving door phenomenon, with all lobbyists having previously held government positions. These factors point to a strong influence on policymaking that may undermine democratic accountability and facilitate authoritarian practices.

On February 3, 2025, the American Automotive Policy Council, led by its president Matt Blunt, issued a statement urging that vehicles and parts compliant with the USMCA trade rules be exempt from new tariffs. This commentary aligns the trade association with policies shaped under the Trump administration, raising concerns about corporate complicity in authoritarian policy maneuvers that favor industry interests over broader worker and consumer protections.

In 2024, the American Automotive Policy Council spent $315,000 on lobbying efforts. This expenditure underscores an aggressive political strategy aimed at influencing policy in favor of automotive industry interests, which from an anti-fascist perspective, raises concerns about the potential undermining of democratic accountability.

Coordinated lobbying efforts with the House Energy & Commerce Committee regarding the REPAIR Act requirements signify industry group attempts to shape regulatory policy in favor of automotive manufacturers. Such efforts raise concerns from an anti-fascist perspective as they exemplify corporate influence in politics that can undermine democratic processes.