Company Directory - University of Missouri
Company Details - University of Missouri
University of Missouri
WebsiteColumbia, United States
A public research university located in Columbia, Missouri, known for its NCAA athletic programs and a wide range of academic offerings.
CCI Score
CCI Score: University of Missouri
-32.26
0.01%
Latest Event
University of Missouri Eliminates Campus DEI Division Under GOP Pressure
University of Missouri System President Mun Choi announced the elimination of the dedicated campus division for diversity, equity, and inclusion in response to sustained Republican pressure. The decision, aimed at diverting legislative bills targeting DEI initiatives, marks a retreat from the institution's commitment to supporting marginalized communities.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
University of Missouri is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- JUL302024
University of Missouri System President Mun Choi announced the elimination of the dedicated campus division for diversity, equity, and inclusion in response to sustained Republican pressure. The decision, aimed at diverting legislative bills targeting DEI initiatives, marks a retreat from the institution's commitment to supporting marginalized communities.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
The elimination of the DEI division directly aligns with political pressure from Republican lawmakers, signaling a capitulation that undermines institutional support for diversity and equity. Such a move reflects a problematic engagement with political forces aligned with authoritarian impulses.
University of Missouri bows to Republican pressure and eliminates campus DEI division
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 5
Dismantling a dedicated division aimed at advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion undermines ethical responsibilities to support marginalized groups. This decision reduces institutional accountability and inclusiveness, setting a concerning precedent of yielding to authoritarian political demands.
University of Missouri bows to Republican pressure and eliminates campus DEI division
- JUL302024
On July 30, 2024, the University of Missouri dismantled its dedicated diversity, equity, and inclusion division in response to Republican political pressures, a move aimed at appeasing legislative opposition to DEI initiatives. The reorganization consolidates DEI functions into other administrative offices and is part of broader efforts to lobby against restrictive state bills, though it raises concerns about the commitment to marginalized communities.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
The decision to eliminate the DEI division is a political maneuver that capitulates to Republican pressures, undermining longstanding efforts to support diversity, equity, and inclusion. This action signals a retreat from actively safeguarding marginalized communities and reflects a broader trend of political appeasement in academic institutions.
University of Missouri eliminates diversity and equity department, bowing to Republican pressures
-40
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
By dismantling a structure designed to promote diversity and support marginalized groups, the university weakens its commitment to human rights and fair labor practices within its community. Although no jobs are lost, the elimination of specialized DEI functions undermines efforts to address historical inequities and support underrepresented students and staff.
University of Missouri eliminates diversity and equity department, bowing to Republican pressures
- JAN012024
The OpenSecrets profile for the University of Missouri reveals that in the 2024 cycle the institution was associated with $861,298 in political contributions and $265,000 in lobbying expenditures. Additionally, the profile highlights a revolving door aspect with several lobbyists having previously held government positions, raising concerns about potential regulatory capture and undue influence on policy.
-15
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
The reported political contributions and lobbying expenditures, while common in large institutions, may facilitate undue influence in policy-making. The significant figures and the involvement of lobbyists with prior government experience raise concerns that such spending could be used to sway political outcomes in a way that undermines democratic accountability.
-10
Regulatory Capture
April 5
The profile's revolving door data, showing that a notable proportion of the university's lobbyists have held previous government roles, suggests a risk of regulatory capture where past governmental connections facilitate undue influence on policy decisions.
- DEC312023
The University of Missouri was reported to have spent $145,000 on lobbying activities in 2023, demonstrating its engagement in political efforts that may influence policy decisions.
-20
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
By spending $145,000 on lobbying in 2023, the University of Missouri is actively engaging in political influence. From an anti-authoritarian perspective, such political contributions and lobbying efforts raise concerns about using institutional resources to sway policy in ways that may perpetuate power imbalances.
- MAR272023
The University of Missouri System replaced its previous diversity and inclusion statements in job postings with a standardized 'values commitment' statement, eliminating previous language that highlighted diversity efforts in hiring.
-50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
By eliminating explicit diversity and inclusion statements from job postings, the University of Missouri System undermines progressive hiring practices and de-emphasizes the importance of affirming diversity in the workplace. This move can be seen as diminishing efforts to foster inclusive environments, which is concerning from an anti-authoritarian and worker rights perspective, even if the stated rationale is consistency across departments.
The University of Missouri System cuts diversity statements from its job postings
- MAR242023
The University of Missouri System has eliminated the use of diversity statements in its hiring processes, replacing them with a generic 'values commitment'. This change, which was implemented immediately across its campuses on March 24, 2023, comes amid political pressures and concerns raised by faculty and students about the potential erosion of diversity and inclusion efforts.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
April 5
The decision reflects alignment with political pressures from Republican lawmakers aiming to reduce emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion measures. This shift in policy suggests a move away from progressive hiring practices, undermining efforts to support marginalized groups.
University of Missouri System scraps diversity statements | Kansas City Star
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 5
By scrapping standardized diversity statements and a diversity hiring rubric in favor of a generic 'values commitment', the university is potentially weakening its commitment to fair labor practices and efforts to ensure inclusivity. This move risks undermining progress in attracting and retaining diverse talent.
University of Missouri System scraps diversity statements | Kansas City Star
- JAN012023
In 2023, the University of Missouri spent $145,000 on lobbying activities, as reported by OpenSecrets. This expenditure exemplifies the institution’s engagement in political influence, raising concerns over the implications of such spending on transparency and democratic accountability.
-10
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 5
Lobbying by public institutions, while sometimes aimed at supporting legitimate academic or research funding interests, can also signal efforts to shape policy in ways that reduce democratic transparency. From an anti-fascist perspective, such undisclosed influence is concerning. The reported $145,000 lobbying expenditure raises questions about whose interests are being prioritized.
Alternatives
Evanston, United States
47.33
Princeton, United States
32.38
New Haven, United States
30.88
Syracuse, United States
20.80
Orlando, United States
16.31
Coral Gables, United States
-4.97
Champaign, United States
-8.31
Santa Cruz, United States
-14.84
Lubbock, United States
-32.63
Gainesville, United States
-44.54
Industries
- 611310
- Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
- 611420
- Computer Training
- 611430
- Professional and Management Development Training
- 611699
- All Other Miscellaneous Schools and Instruction