Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Ultimate Fighting Championship

Company Details - Ultimate Fighting Championship

Ultimate Fighting Championship Logo

Ultimate Fighting Championship

Website

Las Vegas, USA

The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is a premier mixed martial arts organization that hosts events featuring fighters from around the world and is recognized for its dynamic bouts and contribution to the global growth of MMA.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Ultimate Fighting Championship

-62.81

0.03%

Latest Event

UFC Underpays Fighters and Suppresses Competition - Class Action Lawsuit

A class action lawsuit filed in Nevada alleges that the UFC underpays its fighters by locking them into long-term exclusive contracts and eliminating competition. This practice raises serious concerns over labor rights and ethical business practices, highlighting the company's role in exploiting athletes.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL
Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

ARCHITECT

Ultimate Fighting Championship is currently rated as an Architect.

-60 to -100 CCI Score
Companies in this category are instrumental in designing and executing authoritarian rule. They actively create and implement frameworks that sustain oppressive policies, wielding considerable influence in shaping autocratic systems.

Latest Events

  • UFC Underpays Fighters and Suppresses Competition - Class Action Lawsuit Logo
    JUN
    24
    2025

    A class action lawsuit filed in Nevada alleges that the UFC underpays its fighters by locking them into long-term exclusive contracts and eliminating competition. This practice raises serious concerns over labor rights and ethical business practices, highlighting the company's role in exploiting athletes.

  • -70

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 25

    The lawsuit alleges that UFC fighters are locked into long-term, exclusive contracts that undercut their earning potential and stifle competition. Such practices undermine worker rights and fair labor standards, reflecting a broader pattern of unethical business practices within the organization.

    UFC and Endeavor Group Holdings Underpay Fighters, Stifle Competition, Class Action Alleges

  • UFC CEO Engages in Politically Charged White House Tour with Trump Logo
    APR
    07
    2025

    During a White House visit organized by Kid Rock, UFC CEO Dana White joined President Trump and others on a tour where themes such as 'ending wokeness' and securing the border were discussed, reflecting alignment with anti-DEI and nationalist sentiments.

  • UFC Settles $375 Million Antitrust Case over Suppressed Wages Logo
    MAR
    04
    2025

    UFC reached a $375 million antitrust settlement with ex-fighters after allegations of wage suppression and restrictive contract practices. Critics argue that these business practices undermine fair labor standards and contribute to exploitative environments that can bolster authoritarian economic structures.

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    The settlement centers around claims that UFC engaged in practices which suppressed fighter wages and locked athletes into successive contracts, reflecting broader issues of unethical business practices and exploitation. Such actions undermine worker rights and contribute to economic structures that can enable authoritarian practices.

    UFC, Fighters Get Final Approval of $375 Million Settlement (1)

  • UFC CEO Dana White’s Board Appointment Strengthens Authoritarian Ties Logo
    JAN
    06
    2025

    In a controversial move indicative of deepening political alliances, UFC CEO Dana White joined Meta's board, a decision seen as bolstering ties with pro-Trump, far-right political interests. White’s public endorsement and political activity, including campaigning for Donald Trump, raises serious concerns over executive political engagement and the potential normalization of authoritarian influence in corporate leadership.

  • -60

    Executive Political Engagement

    March 25

    Dana White's appointment to Meta’s board, coupled with his active support for Trump during the 2024 campaign and speaking role at the Republican National Convention, underscores an alignment with far-right priorities. This move is interpreted as an executive political engagement that potentially leverages corporate influence to normalize authoritarian policies, contributing negatively to democratic norms. The decision promotes not only corporate self-interest but also an implicit endorsement of the authoritarian figures influencing policy decisions.

    Meta board adds UFC CEO Dana White to strengthen Trump ties - USA TODAY

  • Dana White's Political Engagement and Funding Backing Trump Logo
    NOV
    22
    2024

    Dana White, founder and CEO of UFC, has a long history of political involvement, including significant financial contributions and outspoken endorsements of Donald Trump. His actions—such as a $1 million donation to a pro-Trump PAC and appearances at multiple Republican National Conventions—reflect a pattern of supporting authoritarian figures. Although he now claims to be stepping away from politics, his record indicates complicity in bolstering authoritarian agendas.

  • -70

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 25

    Dana White's extensive financial contributions, including a $1 million donation to a pro-Trump PAC, alongside his repeated political endorsements at events such as the RNC, indicate a deliberate support for authoritarian political figures. This involvement effectively aids in the normalization of such regimes, reflecting a high degree of complicity in empowering fascist tendencies.

    Why UFC's Dana White Is Done With Politics After Years of Backing Trump

  • -60

    Executive Political Engagement

    March 25

    Dana White's personal and public endorsements of Donald Trump—exemplified by his appearances at Republican National Conventions and his vibrant political statements—have contributed to a political environment that supports authoritarian ideologies. His record of executive political engagement remains problematic despite his current disengagement.

    Why UFC's Dana White Is Done With Politics After Years of Backing Trump

  • UFC's Endorsement and Political Engagement Benefits Trump's 2024 Campaign Logo
    NOV
    08
    2024

    The UFC, under the leadership of CEO Dana White, has been actively involved in political endorsements and events supporting Donald Trump's candidacy for the 2024 presidential elections. White’s public political engagement—appearing at high-profile GOP events and facilitating media opportunities—demonstrates a pattern of executive political engagement that may help legitimize authoritarian leadership.

  • -70

    Executive Political Engagement

    March 25

    UFC CEO Dana White's close association with Donald Trump, including active participation in political events and high-visibility media endorsements, indicates a strong pattern of executive political engagement. This behavior is seen as complicity in promoting authoritarian leadership, as it lends support to a political figure with extremist leanings.

    How UFC became a key player in Donald Trump's 2024 presidential campaign success

  • Court Settlement on Fighter Wage Suppression Logo
    OCT
    23
    2024

    A $375 million settlement was reached after allegations that UFC's parent company, Zuffa, engaged in anticompetitive practices that suppressed fighter wages. This case highlights problematic labor practices undermining fair compensation and worker rights in the organization.

  • -70

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    The settlement arising from wage suppression claims indicates that UFC (via its parent Zuffa) engaged in business practices that adversely affected fighter compensation and labor rights. The fact that a class action settlement of $375 million was necessary underscores ethically problematic business practices that contribute to systemic exploitation and economic inequality within the organization.

    Court Preliminarily Approves $375 Million UFC Fighter Wage Suppression Settlement

  • UFC Settlement Highlights Anticompetitive and Monopolistic Practices Logo
    MAR
    13
    2024

    In March 2024, UFC settled multiple antitrust lawsuits over allegations that its exclusive fighter contracts and monopolistic market practices suppressed fighter wages and stifled competition in the MMA industry.

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    UFC's use of exclusive contracts and anticompetitive tactics has led to suppressed fighter wages and reduced revenue share for athletes. This behavior reflects a broader pattern of unethical business practices and negligence in fair labor treatment, which undermines workers' rights and contributes to structural inequities in the industry.

    Cung Le v. Zuffa Promised To Change the UFC. What the Settlement Means for MMA Fighters and the Industry

  • -50

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 25

    The UFC's settlement underscores its structural dominance in the MMA industry, where its market power and exclusionary contractual provisions have effectively reduced competition. This has led to a monopsony in fighter labor markets, limiting fair market practices and inhibiting competitive negotiation.

    Cung Le v. Zuffa Promised To Change the UFC. What the Settlement Means for MMA Fighters and the Industry

  • UFC Antitrust Settlement Highlights Questionable Business Practices Logo
    MAR
    01
    2024

    UFC settled two antitrust lawsuits for $335 million amid allegations that it employed exclusive contracts, coercion, and strategic acquisitions to maintain a monopsony in the MMA fighter market, raising serious concerns about its business ethics and structural market dominance.

  • -70

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    The antitrust settlement discussion exposes UFC's use of exclusive long-term contracts and coercive practices to limit fighter competition, a practice that undermines fair labor standards and ethical business practices. This behavior reflects a significant disregard for business ethics and contributes to broader oppressive market dynamics.

    UFC Owners Confirm Antitrust Settlement with No Further Changes to Business Operations

  • -65

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 25

    By settling the antitrust lawsuits without altering its operations, UFC demonstrates a reliance on structural market power. The use of monopolistic practices, through exclusive contracts and acquisitions, indicates an intent to maintain dominant control in the MMA market, adversely affecting competitive dynamics and worker rights.

    UFC Owners Confirm Antitrust Settlement with No Further Changes to Business Operations

Industries

711211
Sports Teams and Clubs
711219
Other Spectator Sports
711310
Promoters of Performing Arts, Sports, and Similar Events with Facilities