Company Directory - National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing
Company Details - National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing
WebsiteDaytona Beach, United States
NASCAR is the national governing body for stock car racing in the United States, overseeing a number of racing events across various series, including the prestigious NASCAR Cup Series. The organization is dedicated to promoting and sanctioning auto racing events, providing a platform for both professional and amateur racers, and delivering thrilling entertainment to millions of fans.
CCI Score
CCI Score: National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing
16.59
Latest Event
NASCAR PAC's $59.5K Contribution to Federal Candidates
NASCAR’s political action committee contributed $59,500 to federal candidates during the 2023-2024 election cycle, according to data released by the Federal Election Commission and reported by OpenSecrets. This corporate political donation is evaluated under the lens of public and political behavior, as it can be used to exert political influence.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support NASCAR by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
SABOTEUR
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing is currently rated as a Saboteur.
Latest Events
- FEB062025
NASCAR’s political action committee contributed $59,500 to federal candidates during the 2023-2024 election cycle, according to data released by the Federal Election Commission and reported by OpenSecrets. This corporate political donation is evaluated under the lens of public and political behavior, as it can be used to exert political influence.
-30
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 31
The contribution made by NASCAR's PAC, though relatively modest in dollar terms, represents an exertion of corporate political influence. From an anti-fascist perspective, such donations are concerning because they can be used to sway policy decisions in favor of autocratic or undemocratic interests. This donation is evaluated under the 'Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts' category, which falls under Public and Political Behavior.
NASCAR PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates • OpenSecrets
- FEB062025
Data from OpenSecrets shows that the NASCAR PAC contributed $59,500 to federal candidates during the 2023-2024 election cycle, indicating the organization’s involvement in political financing.
-10
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 3
The NASCAR PAC's contribution of $59,500 to federal candidates represents a form of political financing that raises concerns about corporate influence in politics. From an anti-fascist perspective, even modest political donations can potentially support candidates whose policies may align with authoritarian or undemocratic tendencies. While the amount is relatively small, the act of channeling corporate funds into political campaigns warrants scrutiny regarding transparency and alignment with democratic values.
NASCAR PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates • OpenSecrets
- JAN112025
A federal judge ruled against NASCAR's attempt to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit filed by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. The lawsuit challenges NASCAR's charter system, accusing the organization of imposing monopolistic, anticompetitive terms that favor the France family's control over premier stock car racing.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
The lawsuit highlights NASCAR's use of its charter system to enforce restrictive, 'take it or leave it' terms, which suggests anti-competitive and monopolistic business practices. These practices undermine fair competition and concentrate power, aligning with authoritarian control methods.
Federal Judge Delivers Verdict On NASCAR's Lawsuit Dismissal Request
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
April 3
The lawsuit alleges that NASCAR, through its charter system, wields significant economic and structural power to dictate the terms of participation in professional racing. This centralized control not only stifles market competition but also mirrors authoritarian practices in market regulation.
Federal Judge Delivers Verdict On NASCAR's Lawsuit Dismissal Request
- DEC282024
NASCAR's introduction of a non-negotiable, take-it-or-leave-it charter agreement in 2024, which led to an antitrust lawsuit from Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, has been criticized for fostering monopolistic practices. A federal judge's decision highlighting NASCAR's monopoly/monopsony power underscores concerns over ethical business practices and economic control in the sport.
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
NASCAR’s imposition of a 'take-it-or-leave-it' charter agreement limited fair negotiations with teams, reflecting a disregard for ethical business practices and stifling competitive balance within the sport.
Michael Jordan’s NASCAR Team Handed Major Financial Boost by Lawsuit Decision
-70
Economic and Structural Influence
April 3
The federal court's preliminary injunction, accompanied by judicial remarks about NASCAR's monopoly/monopsony power, indicates a misuse of economic influence that undermines competitive fairness and concentration of power, traits often associated with authoritarian practices.
Michael Jordan’s NASCAR Team Handed Major Financial Boost by Lawsuit Decision
- DEC122024
Front Row Motorsports alleges that NASCAR reversed its earlier, informal green light for a charter transfer, conditioning final approval on dropping an ongoing antitrust lawsuit. The move has raised concerns about coercive business practices and the abuse of structural market power within the sport.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
NASCAR's decision to condition the approval of a charter transfer on the dropping of an antitrust lawsuit indicates a coercive and unethical business practice. This approach not only undermines legal recourse but also distorts fair competition, which is a serious concern from a business ethics perspective.
Team claims NASCAR rescinded approval to buy new charter unless federal antitrust suit is dropped
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
April 3
By leveraging its dominant market position, NASCAR's insistence on dropping legal challenges as a condition for charter transfer approval reveals an abuse of structural economic power. This practice reinforces monopolistic control and limits fair competition in the sport.
Team claims NASCAR rescinded approval to buy new charter unless federal antitrust suit is dropped
- NOV092024
NASCAR President Steve Phelps has remained largely silent amid an antitrust lawsuit brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports over NASCAR's take‐it‐or‐leave‐it charter system. The contentious setup, designed to secure financial stability for teams through guaranteed race participation, has sparked allegations of monopolistic practices and a lack of transparency in negotiations.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
NASCAR's deliberate decision to withhold details on charter negotiations and its evasive public communications limit accountability and transparency, weakening democratic oversight and contributing to a climate that can favor authoritarian management styles.
NASCAR President Breaks Silence On 2025 Charters Amid Antitrust Lawsuit Battle
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
The 'take-it-or-leave-it' charter proposal, which effectively forces teams into an inequitable financial arrangement, reflects questionable business practices. The resulting antitrust lawsuit underscores potentially monopolistic behavior that undermines fair competition and ethical corporate conduct.
NASCAR President Breaks Silence On 2025 Charters Amid Antitrust Lawsuit Battle
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
April 3
The charter system entrenches economic disparities by consolidating control and financial benefits among a select group of race teams. This structural imbalance reinforces market power in a way that stifles competition, raising concerns about economic dominance reminiscent of authoritarian consolidation.
NASCAR President Breaks Silence On 2025 Charters Amid Antitrust Lawsuit Battle
- OCT032024
Teams co-owned by Michael Jordan and others have filed a federal antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR and its chairman, alleging that the revenue sharing and charter system imposes coercive and monopolistic terms on teams, effectively limiting competition and forcing teams to sign under duress.
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
April 3
The lawsuit underscores concerns over NASCAR's charter system as a tool of economic coercion. The revenue sharing model and its take-it-or-leave-it approach have been described as monopolistic tactics that structurally limit competition and economically disadvantage teams.
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
The lawsuit criticizes NASCAR’s revenue sharing model as coercive and unethical, forcing teams to sign under duress and limiting their ability to seek fair competition. This practice reflects poor business ethics and an exploitative business practice.
- AUG012024
NASCAR's Speed PAC has consistently funneled funds to political candidates for over a decade, including a series of contributions during the 2023-2024 election cycle. This activity, which supports candidates in regions hosting racetracks and includes past partisan endorsements, raises concerns about corporate influence in the democratic process.
-25
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 31
NASCAR's Speed PAC has steadily contributed funds to political campaigns, with donations directed toward candidates in key racing markets and historical endorsements by high-ranking officials such as the endorsement of Trump. This behavior can be seen as prioritizing corporate and industry interests over broader democratic accountability, and may inadvertently support candidates whose policy positions align with authoritarian tendencies. The focus on strategic political contributions exposes the company to criticism for influencing policy and regulatory outcomes in ways that advantage the motorsports industry.
Politically Motivated: NASCAR’s Speed PAC Has Given Cash To Political Candidates For 10 Years
- APR152024
Facing legal challenges from the far‐right group American First Legal over its diversity programs, NASCAR proactively revised its DE&I criteria for driver, pit crew, and internship development initiatives. The company shifted from specifying 'top minority and female' candidates to seeking applicants of 'diverse backgrounds and experience' in anticipation of a lawsuit, reaffirming its commitment to inclusive hiring despite politically motivated litigation.
+40
Public and Political Behavior
March 31
NASCAR’s proactive adjustment of its DE&I program in response to politically motivated legal challenges from a far‐right group reflects a strong public stance supporting inclusive and anti-authoritarian policies. By anticipating and preparing for legal action, the company demonstrates effective public and political behavior that counters extremist narratives.
+50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 31
By modifying its diversity program requirements—from favoring 'top minority and female' candidates to seeking applicants with diverse backgrounds—NASCAR is actively reinforcing its commitment to equitable hiring practices. This change, made in anticipation of a legal challenge from a far-right group, underscores its dedication to upholding DE&I values despite pressures to conform to regressive policies.
- DEC312023
A conservative legal group, America First Legal, sent a letter to the EEOC in late 2023 alleging that NASCAR's marketing of early-career opportunities and internship programs discriminates against white, male Americans. The claim, part of a broader politically motivated challenge to DEIA policies backed by Trump-era appointments at the EEOC, highlights a deliberate effort to undermine diversity initiatives.
+40
Public and Political Behavior
March 31
The politically charged allegation by a right-wing group with ties to Trump-era policies represents an authoritarian attempt to discredit NASCAR's efforts to promote diversity. From an anti-fascist perspective, being targeted by a group aiming to dismantle fair DEIA policies underscores NASCAR's implicit commitment to equitable practices.
A Right-Wing Group Accused NASCAR of Discrimination ... - Mother Jones
+60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 31
NASCAR's DEIA practices, which include targeted internship and early-career opportunities designed to address longstanding disparities, are being unfairly criticized by a politically motivated right-wing group. Such initiatives advance fair labor practices and support marginalized groups, reinforcing ethical business responsibilities.
A Right-Wing Group Accused NASCAR of Discrimination ... - Mother Jones
- NOV052023
A formal discrimination complaint was filed by America First Legal alleging that NASCAR's diversity programs discriminate against white, male applicants. Despite this complaint, NASCAR defends its drive for diversity as a strategic initiative to broaden opportunities for minority and female drivers, reinforcing an inclusive and anti-discriminatory stance.
+40
Public and Political Behavior
March 31
NASCAR’s public messaging, underscored by its president’s supportive comments on the diversity program, demonstrates a proactive stance toward inclusion. Despite the politically charged complaint by America First Legal, the company upholds a policy that challenges exclusionary practices, representing positive public and political behavior.
+50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
The diversity initiatives, such as the driver development and pit crew programs, are designed to empower minority and female participants, reinforcing fair labor practices and human rights within the industry. The complaint, led by a group with clear anti-inclusion motivations, inadvertently underscores NASCAR’s commitment to enhancing opportunities for underrepresented groups.
- NOV022023
NASCAR and its supported racing team Rev Racing, which focuses on developing female and minority drivers, are now under investigation request by America First Legal for alleged illegal discrimination against white, male Americans. The legal challenge appears politically motivated and targets NASCAR’s progressive diversity efforts.
+60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
NASCAR's initiative to support female and minority drivers through Rev Racing represents a strong commitment to diversity and inclusion. Despite facing politically motivated legal challenges from America First Legal—led by a former Trump adviser—this action underscores progressive labor and human rights practices. The challenge, perceived as an attack against efforts to promote equality, further validates NASCAR’s proactive stance against entrenched conservative and authoritarian pressures.
Nascar Accused of Bias Against White Men in Diversity Efforts
- NOV012023
In November 2023, the conservative group America First Legal filed a complaint with the EEOC against NASCAR, alleging illegal discrimination against white male Americans. This suit challenges NASCAR’s diversity efforts and underscores politically charged disputes over affirmative action.
+30
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
The complaint by America First Legal, though framed as a discrimination claim, targets a group that is not historically marginalized. NASCAR’s established diversity initiatives, including its Drive for Diversity program, are aligned with promoting inclusion. From an anti-fascist perspective, the complaint is viewed as an attempt to undermine progress towards racial equality, thereby reflecting positively on NASCAR's commitment to inclusivity.
When NASCAR was hit with $500M lawsuit for alleged racial discrimination
- APR142023
Under the leadership of new CHRO John Ferguson, NASCAR is accelerating its diversity initiatives through enhanced internship programs, a career lab partnership with Bethune-Cookman University, and strengthened employee resource groups targeting Black, female, Hispanic, and LGBT communities. These efforts aim to broaden its workforce and fan base, representing a progressive shift in an industry historically lacking diversity.
+70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
NASCAR’s comprehensive push to enhance diversity through strategic partnerships, internship programs, and active support for underrepresented groups demonstrates a commitment to improved labor relations and human rights practices. By broadening its talent pipeline and ensuring representation of marginalized communities, these initiatives help challenge traditional exclusionary practices in motorsports, marking a significant positive step from an anti-authoritarian and progressive perspective.
NASCAR's Diversity Efforts Pick Up Speed Under New CHRO - SHRM
- JAN012023
NASCAR, Inc. spent $280,000 on lobbying activities in 2023, as reported by OpenSecrets. The expenditure is highlighted as an example of corporate political influence that could undermine democratic processes.
-30
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 31
The documented lobbying expense of $280,000 in 2023 indicates NASCAR's active engagement in influencing public policy through corporate lobbying. From an anti-fascist perspective, such corporate political spending is concerning as it can allow private interests to shape democratic processes and potentially favor authoritarian policies. The influence exerted through lobbying money raises accountability issues when corporate interests override broader community and democratic welfare.
- JUN012021
NASCAR’s support for Bubba Wallace, a driver known for championing Black Lives Matter values, signals the company’s alignment with progressive, anti-authoritarian ideals despite backlash from traditional fan bases.
+50
Public and Political Behavior
March 31
By endorsing Bubba Wallace, NASCAR has taken a stand in favor of inclusivity and diversity. This support for a driver known for his progressive views and alignment with the Black Lives Matter movement reflects a corporate commitment to countering authoritarian and reactionary elements within its traditional fan culture.
- JUL152020
In response to heightened racial tensions in 2020, NASCAR officially banned Confederate flags from its races, a policy change mentioned in the context of Bubba Wallace's noose controversy. The decision, coming two weeks before a controversial incident involving Wallace, has been widely recognized for supporting inclusivity and rejecting symbols of racial hate.
- JUL012020
NASCAR made the decision to ban the Confederate flag in response to the Black Lives Matter movement, marking a shift toward inclusivity and rejecting symbols associated with racism and authoritarianism.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
March 31
The decision to ban the Confederate flag demonstrates NASCAR's commitment to rejecting symbols tied to white supremacy and authoritarian values. This move aligns the company with progressive, anti-fascist principles by supporting marginalized communities and distancing itself from divisive historical symbols.
- JUN232020
NASCAR has taken a decisive step by banning the display of the Confederate flag at its events. This policy shift comes in the wake of rising scrutiny over the organization’s historical ties to racist symbolism and follows lobbying efforts by Bubba Wallace—the only Black driver in NASCAR’s top circuit—as well as public endorsements from figures like Richard Petty. This move is seen as a firm rejection of symbols associated with fascism and authoritarian ideologies.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
NASCAR's decision to ban the Confederate flag represents a robust public and political stance against historic symbols of racism and authoritarianism. By aligning its policies with anti-racist values—highlighted by the advocacy of Bubba Wallace and support from influential figures like Richard Petty—NASCAR signals its commitment to inclusivity and to countering fascist legacies.
NASCAR: Its History Of Racism And Relations With The Confederate Flag
- JUN152020
In response to widespread anti-racism protests, NASCAR announced a policy prohibiting the display of Confederate flags at its events and venues, reinforcing its commitment to an inclusive environment.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
NASCAR's public decision to disallow Confederate flags strongly signals opposition to symbols associated with racism and authoritarianism, thereby aligning with progressive, anti-fascist values.
Amid nationwide anti-racism protests, NASCAR bans Confederate flags at tracks
+60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
By enforcing a ban on a symbol laden with historical racism, NASCAR demonstrates ethical responsibility and reaffirms its stand against hate, contributing positively to social justice and corporate ethical practices.
Amid nationwide anti-racism protests, NASCAR bans Confederate flags at tracks
- JUN112020
NASCAR announced that the Confederate flag will be prohibited from all NASCAR events and properties, reinforcing its commitment to a welcoming and inclusive environment. The decision comes amid calls for racial justice, notably supported by driver Bubba Wallace.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
NASCAR's decision to ban the Confederate flag is a strong public stance rejecting symbols of white supremacy and authoritarianism. This move reinforces an anti-fascist, inclusive narrative and sends a clear political message that aligns with anti-racist values.
+70
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
By banning the Confederate flag, NASCAR upholds business practices and ethical responsibility by actively rejecting symbols tied to racism and white supremacy. This ensures that the organization's events foster a safe and inclusive environment for all stakeholders.
- JUN102020
NASCAR announced a policy banning the display of Confederate flags at all events, a decision driven by calls from driver Bubba Wallace and supported by community and political leaders, aiming to create a more welcoming and inclusive environment at its races.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
The decision to ban Confederate flags is a significant move against symbols associated with racism and hate, aligning NASCAR with anti-fascist and inclusive values. This action, spurred by input from marginalized voices such as driver Bubba Wallace and applauded by community leaders, demonstrates strong public and political behavior in challenging harmful traditions.
- JUN102020
NASCAR announced a ban on the Confederate battle flag at all its events and properties, citing that its presence contradicts the commitment to a welcoming and inclusive environment. The decision, influenced by years of public pressure and remarks from figures such as former CEO Brian France and driver Darrell 'Bubba' Wallace, marks a pivotal moment in the fight against symbols of racial division and authoritarian nostalgia in the sport.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
By banning the Confederate flag, NASCAR takes a strong public stance against symbols associated with racism and divisiveness, thereby promoting inclusion and repudiating authoritarian and fascist ideologies. This decisive action supports anti-fascist and progressive values, reinforcing a commitment to a politically and culturally inclusive environment.
- JUN102020
NASCAR announced on June 10, 2020, that it would prohibit the display of the Confederate flag at all of its events, stating that the symbol is inconsistent with its commitment to a welcoming and inclusive environment for its fans, competitors, and the broader racing community.
+85
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
NASCAR's decision to ban a symbol widely associated with hate and racism underscores a commitment to ethical business practices and inclusivity. This move directly supports anti-fascist values by rejecting symbols that have historically been used to promote authoritarian and exclusionary ideologies, and it reinforces the organization’s dedication to creating a positive, welcoming environment for all stakeholders.
NASCAR bans Confederate flag from all its events, including races
- JUN102020
NASCAR instituted a policy banning the Confederate flag from its races and properties to distance itself from a symbol of slavery and racism. The decision, announced ahead of a race at Martinsville Speedway and supported by its lone Black driver Bubba Wallace, marks a commitment to inclusivity amid nationwide protests.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
The move sends a strong public message rejecting hate symbols and aligning NASCAR with inclusive, anti-racist values. In the climate of global protests and social unrest, this decision helps foster a welcoming environment and defies entrenched symbols of racism.
+75
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
By enacting this ban, NASCAR demonstrates ethical responsibility in its business practices. The decision not only addresses cultural symbols linked to exclusion and hate but also positions the organization as one committed to social justice and a more equitable environment.
- JUN102020
NASCAR announced that the Confederate flag will be banned from all its events, citing a commitment to providing an inclusive environment amid ongoing racial protests in the United States.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
By banning the Confederate flag—a symbol historically linked to racism and white supremacy—NASCAR is taking a stand against symbols associated with fascism and hate. This move reinforces its commitment to communal inclusion and opposes authoritarian narratives, meriting a positive score in Public and Political Behavior.
+60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
The decision to bar a divisive symbol from events is also a demonstration of ethical business practices and responsibility. This corporate policy reflects an effort to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion within the sporting community, countering historic practices that have marginalized communities.
- JUN012020
In response to the Black Lives Matter movement, NASCAR instituted a ban on the display of Confederate flags at its events, marking a move towards promoting diversity and inclusivity and distancing the organization from hate symbols.
+70
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 3
The decision to ban the Confederate flag represents a progressive corporate policy that aligns with anti-racist and inclusive values, distancing NASCAR from symbols of hate and authoritarian ideology. This move supports marginalized communities and contributes positively to ethical business practices.
- JUL012016
At a rally in Georgia in 2016, NASCAR CEO Brian France endorsed GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, aligning the organization with far-right political figures and potentially reinforcing exclusionary and authoritarian ideals within its fanbase.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 3
The public endorsement of Donald Trump by a NASCAR executive, orchestrated with appearances by prominent drivers, ties the organization to an authoritarian political stance. This action risks alienating marginalized communities and supports regressive political ideologies, thereby negatively impacting its public and political behavior score.
- JAN012016
A 2016 court filing by Terrance Cox III alleges that NASCAR, despite its Drive for Diversity initiatives started in 2004, failed to properly encourage corporate sponsors to support African American drivers and teams. The lawsuit demands $500M in damages based on claims of discriminatory practices.
-40
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
The lawsuit alleges that NASCAR did not uphold its commitment to diversity by neglecting to urge sponsors to support African American drivers, thereby contributing to discriminatory practices. From an anti-racist, pro-labor perspective, such allegations indicate a failure to protect marginalized groups.
Alternatives
Denver, United States
74.94
New York City, USA
-5.92
Chennai, India
-39.67
The Bronx, USA
-6.43
New York City, United States
75.93
Philadelphia, United States
63.16
Sacramento, United States
59.74
San Francisco, United States
27.48
Atlanta, United States
24.82
Washington, D.C., United States
12.78
Industries
- 487110
- Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Land
- 541614
- Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
- 711211
- Sports Teams and Clubs
- 711212
- Racetracks
- 711219
- Other Spectator Sports
- 711310
- Promoters of Performing Arts, Sports, and Similar Events with Facilities