The Spectator

The Spectator is a British weekly publication that provides political and cultural commentary, including criticism of current affairs, reviews, and essays. It offers a platform for diverse opinions and debates on various topics, making it a significant voice in contemporary journalism.

CCI Score

35.89

-0.02% April 18

Latest Event

Investigative Journalism Exposing Mass Surveillance Ties

The Spectator published an investigative piece on July 15, 2021, exposing how US tech companies are implicated in providing surveillance technology that supports China's authoritarian repression of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The article highlights the systematic abuse and serves to inform the public of corporate complicity in state-sponsored human rights violations.

Take Action

So what can you do? Support Spectator by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.

Shop Alternatives SEE ALL: AP

New Yorker

NYT
Use Your Voice OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score SUPPORT CCI

DISSENTER

The Spectator is currently rated as a Dissenter.

+25 to +44 CCI Score

These companies are vocal in their opposition to authoritarian regimes. They publicly criticize oppressive policies and engage in advocacy efforts to promote accountability and transparency, even if their actions aren’t as extensive as those of Moral Leaders.

Latest Events

JUL

15

2021

Investigative Journalism Exposing Mass Surveillance Ties
54.91

The Spectator published an investigative piece on July 15, 2021, exposing how US tech companies are implicated in providing surveillance technology that supports China's authoritarian repression of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The article highlights the systematic abuse and serves to inform the public of corporate complicity in state-sponsored human rights violations.
+80

Media Influence and Propaganda

April 2

By publishing a detailed investigative report that exposes how US tech companies are enabling China's mass surveillance and repression of ethnic minorities, The Spectator contributes to holding powerful corporate actors accountable for authoritarian practices. This act of journalistic transparency supports democratic oversight and informs public debate, aligning with anti-authoritarian and anti-fascist principles.

The US tech companies behind China's mass surveillance
JUN

28

2021

Coverage of Surveillance Tech Vulnerabilities
27.33

The Spectator published an article on 28 June 2021 analyzing vulnerabilities in surveillance technology as evidenced by the hacked camera incident involving Matt Hancock’s office. The piece highlights how insecure tech can be exploited by authoritarian actors, such as China’s cyber spies, raising important concerns about surveillance practices and tech accountability.
+40

Media Influence and Propaganda

April 2

The article serves as a critical media intervention, exposing the vulnerabilities in surveillance technology that authoritarian regimes may exploit. By bringing attention to how insecure devices can be repurposed for intrusive surveillance, The Spectator uses its platform to inform public debate and indirectly challenge authoritarian practices. This aligns with anti-authoritarian values by fostering awareness of the dangers posed by such technology.

Matt Hancock and the problem with China's surveillance tech
JAN

22

2021

Publication of Anti-Slave Labor Supply Chain Commentary
39.27

The Spectator published an opinion piece urging the U.S. government to enforce stricter supply chain audits and boycott goods produced with slave labor used by autocratic regimes, particularly in China. The article calls for a realignment of commercial practices with ethical values by exposing and challenging forced labor practices.
+60

Public and Political Behavior

April 2

The article demonstrates proactive public and political behavior by using its platform to advocate for policies that counter autocratic practices and forced labor. By calling for government action and supply chain transparency, The Spectator aligns itself with anti-authoritarian principles, marking a positive influence in the public discourse. This action supports ethical accountability and advances progressive values.

America Needs to Break the Chinese Slave Labor Supply Chain
APR

17

2015

Editorial Critique of Political Donations
22.05

On 17 April 2015, The Spectator published an editorial decrying the influence of large donations in politics. The piece highlights Richard Desmond’s donations to UKIP, arguing that such contributions skew democratic equality by amplifying the power of wealthy donors, a critique implicitly opposing authoritarian influence in political processes.
+60

Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

April 2

The article takes a strong stance against large-scale political donations, specifically criticizing Richard Desmond’s funding of UKIP, which is seen as a mechanism for concentrating political power and undermining democratic equality. This aligns with anti-authoritarian and anti-fascist principles by challenging the undue influence of wealthy interests in politics.

45 million reasons why donations to political parties are dodgy as hell