Taylor & Francis Group

Taylor & Francis Group is a leading academic publisher known for its wide range of scholarly journals, books, and digital resources. As one of the 'big five' in academic publishing, the company plays a significant role in disseminating academic research across various disciplines.

CCI Score

-19.74

April 29

Latest Event

Profit-Driven Practices in Academic Publishing

An article published by The Conversation highlights editorial board resignations and concerns over profit-driven decisions in academic publishing. As one of the 'big five', Taylor & Francis Group is implicated in practices that prioritize profit over research integrity, contributing to systemic consolidation that limits access to scholarly work and undermines academic quality.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives SEE ALL: Benzinga

Axios

Nature
Use Your Voice OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score SUPPORT CCI

ENABLER

Taylor & Francis Group is currently rated as an Enabler.

-10 to -19 CCI Score

Companies in this segment facilitate authoritarian practices while claiming neutrality. They provide resources or support that indirectly bolster oppressive regimes, thereby undermining democratic accountability without overtly endorsing the regime.

Latest Events

DEC

15

2024

Profit-Driven Practices in Academic Publishing
-35.00

An article published by The Conversation highlights editorial board resignations and concerns over profit-driven decisions in academic publishing. As one of the 'big five', Taylor & Francis Group is implicated in practices that prioritize profit over research integrity, contributing to systemic consolidation that limits access to scholarly work and undermines academic quality.
SEP

17

2024

Antitrust Lawsuit Reveals Unethical Publishing Practices
-38.66

Taylor & Francis, one of the major academic publishers named in the antitrust lawsuit, is accused of collusive practices to maintain market dominance. The lawsuit alleges that the company and its peers exploit unpaid peer review systems, restrict academic freedom, and divert funds that could otherwise support public research, thereby negatively impacting academic integrity and the broader public interest.
-50

Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

March 25

The lawsuit highlights unethical business practices by alleging that Taylor & Francis and other publishers have agreed to policies that leave peer reviewers unpaid and restrict academic submission, effectively exploiting academic labor and profiting off publicly-funded research. This behavior directly undermines ethical responsibility and transparency in business practices.

6 major academic publishers face antitrust lawsuit
-30

Economic and Structural Influence

March 25

The lawsuit points to a cartel-like arrangement among major academic publishers which manipulates the market structure. This economic collusion stifles competition, reduces incentives for timely and high-quality peer review, and ultimately harms the dissemination of scholarly research, reflecting a negative impact on broader economic and structural influence.

6 major academic publishers face antitrust lawsuit
JUN

24

2024

Boycott Call Over Censorship of Sexual Misconduct Content
-41.77

Academics and social justice advocates are calling for a boycott of Taylor & Francis Group after its imprint Routledge decided to unpublish a book chapter addressing sexual misconduct in academia, a move that critics argue silences survivors and protects powerful interests.
-50

Public and Political Behavior

March 25

Taylor & Francis Group's decision to unpublish a key chapter addressing sexual misconduct reflects a concerning stance that aligns with protecting established power structures rather than upholding academic freedom and justice. This move, perceived as a form of censorship, undermines transparency and accountability which are critical in the fight against authoritarian tendencies in academia.

Call to boycott publisher after sexual misconduct book scrapped
-40

Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

March 25

The handling of the publication—scrapping a chapter that tackled sexual misconduct—demonstrates a lapse in ethical responsibility. Rather than addressing allegations transparently, the decision appears to prioritize relationships with influential figures and institutions, an act that undermines trust in the publisher's commitment to ethical business practices.

Call to boycott publisher after sexual misconduct book scrapped
FEB

05

2024

Publication of Research on Forced Labour in Supply Chains
61.89

Taylor & Francis Group published a scholarly article that examines the role of the private sector in addressing forced labour within supply chains. By providing a platform for this critical research, the company supports academic discourse on ethical business practices and human rights, indirectly promoting transparency and accountability regarding forced labour.
+70

Supply Chain Ethics

March 25

Taylor & Francis Group’s decision to publish research focused on forced labour and supply chain accountability demonstrates a commitment to advancing scholarship on human rights and ethical practices. While this does not directly alter their internal supply chain policies, the dissemination of critical research contributes positively by fostering broader awareness and accountability, aligning with anti-fascist and ethical business values.

Forced Labour and Accountability in Supply Chains: The Role of the Private Sector
AUG

31

2023

Censorship and Reversal: Taylor & Francis Group’s Handling of Academic Controversy
-37.72

Following legal threats and complaints regarding Chapter 12 on sexual misconduct in academia, Taylor & Francis Group temporarily withdrew the chapter, prompting an outcry over censorship and a subsequent reversal of rights. This incident highlights concerns related to academic freedom and ethical business practices.
-40

Public and Political Behavior

March 25

Under the category 'Public and Political Behavior', Taylor & Francis Group’s initial decision to withdraw Chapter 12 in response to legal threats demonstrates an acquiescence to authoritative pressure, undermining academic freedom and the public’s right to open discourse. This act reflects a negative political stance by prioritizing legal and conservative pressures over transparent accountability.

Open Letter to Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group | BUALA
-50

Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

March 25

Under the category 'Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility', the company’s decision to withdraw critical academic content, and the opaque manner in which it handled legal threats and communications with authors, reflects unethical business practices. This response prioritizes legal and profit concerns over accountability and support for marginalized voices, reinforcing authoritarian practices within corporate decision-making.

Open Letter to Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group | BUALA
MAR

25

2019

Editorial Interference Raises Ethical Concerns at Taylor & Francis
-27.16

The article highlights cases of editorial interference at Taylor & Francis, raising ethical concerns about the compromise of academic integrity and independence, which indirectly could support authoritarian tendencies by limiting diverse scholarly perspectives.
-50

Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

March 25

The documented editorial interference at Taylor & Francis undermines scholarly independence and ethical publishing practices, contributing to a culture where academic integrity is compromised. This manipulation of editorial content can suppress diverse academic voices and open debate, indirectly aligning with authoritarian methods that limit free exchange of ideas.

Academic Publishing and Scientific Integrity: Case Studies of Editorial Interference at Taylor & Francis