Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Nature

Company Details - Nature

Nature Logo

Nature

Website

United Kingdom

A prestigious scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed research across a wide range of scientific disciplines.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Nature

42.77

-0.01%

Latest Event

Nature Poll Highlights Scientists' Exodus Amid Censorship Concerns

Nature published a poll showing that 75% of surveyed scientists—including over 1,200 respondents—are considering leaving the United States as a reaction to censorship and funding cuts under the Trump administration. The poll underscores the chilling effects of authoritarian policies on scientific research and advocates for the protection of scientific freedom.

Take Action

So what can you do? Support Nature by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.

Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

DISSENTER

Nature is currently rated as a Dissenter.

+25 to +44 CCI Score
These companies are vocal in their opposition to authoritarian regimes. They publicly criticize oppressive policies and engage in advocacy efforts to promote accountability and transparency, even if their actions aren’t as extensive as those of Moral Leaders.

Latest Events

  • Nature Poll Highlights Scientists' Exodus Amid Censorship Concerns Logo
    APR
    01
    2025

    Nature published a poll showing that 75% of surveyed scientists—including over 1,200 respondents—are considering leaving the United States as a reaction to censorship and funding cuts under the Trump administration. The poll underscores the chilling effects of authoritarian policies on scientific research and advocates for the protection of scientific freedom.

  • Nature Staff Strike Over Pay Logo
    JUN
    17
    2024

    Staff across Nature journals have voted overwhelmingly to strike over a 5.8% pay offer, arguing that the increase does not adequately counter rising living costs despite strong corporate profits and high executive salaries. The action, prompted by union dissatisfaction following failed negotiations, emphasizes the demand for fair labor practices.

  • +80

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    April 2

    The decision by staff in the Nature journal portfolio to strike over an inadequate pay increase highlights labor discontent and a struggle for fair wages amid soaring living costs and notable corporate profits. This action is a clear endorsement of worker rights and fair labor practices, aligning with progressive, anti-authoritarian values.

    Staff at Nature journals ready for strike this week over pay

  • UK Staff Strike at Nature Journals Over Pay Dispute Logo
    JUN
    20
    2023

    UK-based staff at Springer Nature’s Nature journals have staged a second day of strikes over pay disputes, rejecting a 5.8% raise in favor of demands for fairer wage increases amid rising living costs. The dispute, marked by union criticisms of the company's bargaining methods and perceived disregard for worker rights, is part of a prolonged industrial action highlighted by an open letter with widespread support.

  • -70

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    April 2

    The article details ongoing strikes by staff protesting insufficient wage increases that fail to match inflation, reflecting problematic labor relations. From an anti-authoritarian perspective, inadequate support for workers’ rights and collective bargaining represents a negative business practice that undermines fair labor standards.

    Nature journals' U.K. staff stage second day of strikes over pay - AAAS

  • Nature's Political Endorsement of Biden Logo
    MAY
    02
    2023

    Nature published an endorsement piece supporting Biden by criticizing Trump's handling of COVID‐19, which was shown in an experimental survey to polarize trust in the journal among different political groups. This action signals a clear stance against authoritarian approaches and champions progressive values.

  • +80

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 2

    Nature’s decision to publicly endorse Biden during a critical phase of the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates an active political engagement that challenges authoritarian narratives. By highlighting Trump's mismanagement and aligning with progressive values, Nature is taking a stance that is favorable from an anti-fascist perspective, even though the endorsement resulted in polarized trust among different political groups.

    Political endorsement by Nature and trust in scientific expertise during COVID-19

  • Nature's 2020 Endorsement of Joe Biden Logo
    NOV
    03
    2020

    In 2020, the prestigious scientific journal Nature publicly endorsed Joe Biden in the US presidential election. This politically-engaged act, while aligning with progressive and anti-authoritarian values, also had the effect of reducing trust among certain conservative groups, highlighting the complex interplay between scientific credibility and political partisanship.

  • +70

    Executive Political Engagement

    April 2

    Nature’s decision to endorse Joe Biden is an example of executive political engagement that aligns with progressive values, marking a clear stance against authoritarian tendencies. Although the endorsement contributed to a loss of credibility among Trump supporters, from an anti-fascist perspective this political act supports values opposing far-right ideologies.

    Political endorsements can affect scientific credibility

  • Nature’s 2020 Editorial Endorsement of Biden Logo
    OCT
    01
    2020

    In October 2020, Nature broke with its usual silence by endorsing Joe Biden for the US presidency, arguing that the stakes of re-electing Donald Trump were too high for science, public health, and democratic integrity. The endorsement was positioned as a necessary stand against the authoritarian tendencies observed during Trump’s presidency.

  • +80

    Executive Political Engagement

    April 2

    Nature's decision to endorse Joe Biden in October 2020 demonstrates a proactive stance against authoritarianism, particularly in light of Donald Trump’s controversial four-year term which many viewed as harmful to scientific integrity and public welfare. By taking a clear position, the journal utilized its influential platform to support evidence-based policies and counter policies that undermined scientific research and public health, aligning with anti-fascist and progressive values.

    Should Nature endorse political candidates? Yes — when the occasion arises

Industries

541720
Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
611710
Educational Support Services
511120
Periodical Publishers
511130
Book Publishers