Company Directory - Oakland Athletics
Company Details - Oakland Athletics
Oakland Athletics
WebsiteOakland, United States
The Oakland Athletics, commonly referred to as the A's, are a professional baseball team based in Oakland, California. Established in 1901, the team is a member of Major League Baseball (MLB) and competes in the American League (AL) West division. The Athletics have a rich history marked by multiple championships, and they are known for their innovative approaches in player development and analytics. The franchise is currently undergoing a relocation process, moving from Oakland to Sacramento and eventually to Las Vegas, as it seeks a new home and improved facilities.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Oakland Athletics
-41.24
0.02%
Latest Event
A's Relocation Triggers Layoffs and Loss of Benefits for Coliseum Workers
Following the Oakland A's final game in Oakland, approximately 400 concession workers, bartenders, and suite staff lost their jobs and health insurance without severance pay. The layoffs, which followed failed negotiations with Aramark and were tied to the team's imminent relocation, have sparked criticism regarding the treatment of long-serving workers.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Oakland Athletics is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- SEP252024
Following the Oakland A's final game in Oakland, approximately 400 concession workers, bartenders, and suite staff lost their jobs and health insurance without severance pay. The layoffs, which followed failed negotiations with Aramark and were tied to the team's imminent relocation, have sparked criticism regarding the treatment of long-serving workers.
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 1
The decision to let go of 400 long-term workers without severance or healthcare underscores a severe lapse in labor relations and human rights practices. Such actions reflect a disregard for worker welfare and fair labor standards, particularly in the context of the team’s controversial relocation. This treatment of employees contributes negatively to the company’s overall social responsibility record.
Oakland Coliseum workers: hundreds face job loss, no healthcare
- APR112024
The Oakland Athletics' announced move from Oakland to Sacramento, with a future plan for Las Vegas, has resulted in significant layoffs and a communication breakdown, leading to profound emotional and financial insecurity among long-term employees.
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 1
The delayed communication about the relocation and subsequent layoffs indicate a disregard for worker rights and wellbeing. Long-term employees, who relied on stable employment and benefits, are now facing severe financial and emotional hardships, reflecting poor labor practices and undermining human rights.
The Oakland Athletics' Move and Its Impact on Employees and Community
- APR052024
The Oakland Athletics' decision to relocate from Oakland to Sacramento has led to layoffs and reduced shifts for Coliseum workers who rely on game-day employment for essential benefits. Workers expressed feelings of betrayal and neglect, highlighting that leadership, notably owner John Fisher, has long signaled disinterest in their welfare.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 1
The relocation has directly resulted in layoffs and diminished work hours for Coliseum staff, undermining worker rights and access to necessary benefits such as health coverage. The expressed sentiments of abandonment and betrayal underscore a failure in ethical labor practices, marking a negative impact on worker welfare.
Oakland Coliseum workers' lives upended with A's move to Sacramento
- JAN172024
The Athletics Investment Group, the lobbying arm for the Oakland Athletics, donated over $112,000 to 46 Nevada lawmakers in 2023 as part of efforts to secure political support for a $1.5 billion stadium project and associated public funding package. This move raises concerns regarding corporate influence over public policy.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 1
The Athletics Investment Group's donation of over $112k to 46 Nevada lawmakers is an example of corporate political contributions that can potentially secure favorable legislative decisions regarding stadium funding. This form of lobbying raises concerns over undue corporate influence in public policy, which undermines democratic accountability and can contribute to regulatory capture.
- JAN112024
The Oakland Athletics received $380 million in public financing and subsequently made small contributions to Nevada politicians who voted for the financing bill, raising concerns over political favoritism and potential quid pro quo influence.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 1
The team's practice of channeling public funds into financial contributions for legislators who supported the financing bill suggests an attempt to reward political allies. This behavior aligns with problematic political contributions that can undermine democratic accountability and foster undue influence, which is concerning from an anti-fascist and progressive perspective.
A's Handouts to Nevada Politicians Continue - Sports Illustrated
- DEC312023
After receiving a $380 million public subsidy package from the Nevada State Legislature, the Oakland A's contributed a total of $112,000 in campaign donations to state and local lawmakers during the last quarter of 2023. These contributions, made to a broad array of legislators, raise concerns about corporate influence on political processes.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 1
The Athletics' decision to donate $112,000 to lawmakers following a significant $380 million public funding deal suggests an attempt to secure favorable political outcomes. This behavior exemplifies targeted political contributions that may undermine democratic processes and represent corporate complicity in distorting political influence, raising concerns from an anti-authoritarian perspective.
Oakland A’s, recent recipients of $380m deal, contribute $112k to Nevada state lawmakers
- NOV062023
A Nevada district court judge dismissed a petition aimed at repealing $380 million in public funds for the Oakland Athletics' planned Las Vegas stadium. The decision, pending a possible appeal to the state supreme court, preserves the Athletics' access to public subsidies as they move forward with their stadium plans.
-20
Economic and Structural Influence
April 1
The legal setback for those opposing the use of public funds illustrates the Athletics' strategic reliance on government subsidies. This reliance not only reinforces economic disparities but also embeds the team within structures that favor corporate interests over equitable public resource distribution.
Judge tosses out petition to repeal public funds for Athletics stadium in Las Vegas
-25
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
The dismissal of the petition, which sought to give voters a direct say in repealing public funds for the stadium, underscores a dynamic where corporate interests override democratic input. By maintaining the flow of taxpayer money, the Athletics are positioned to benefit from a system that diminishes civic oversight, aligning with a problematic trend in public and political behavior.
Judge tosses out petition to repeal public funds for Athletics stadium in Las Vegas
- JUN162023
Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo signed a bill providing $380 million in public funding for a new stadium in Las Vegas for the Oakland Athletics, a key step in the team's relocation. This political decision, made amidst protests from Oakland fans, highlights the fusion of public policy and corporate interests.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
The governor’s signing of SB1, earmarking $380 million in public funds to facilitate the Athletics' move, indicates a politicized alliance between the state and the team. This decision not only prioritizes corporate relocation over longstanding community interests in Oakland, but also raises concerns about the use of taxpayer money to underwrite private corporate ambitions.
-20
Economic and Structural Influence
April 1
The use of substantial public funds through this legislation reflects economic favoritism toward the relocating franchise, demonstrating structural influence where corporate interests are prioritized through state-backed financial support. This move can undermine local economic stability and community control, contributing to broader concerns of corporate capture.
- JUN142023
During a game on June 14, 2023, fans at the Oakland Coliseum staged a reverse boycott to protest the Oakland Athletics’ planned move to Las Vegas. The protest, marked by calls to 'sell the team' and other anti-relocation messages, highlighted deep community opposition to decisions perceived as prioritizing corporate interests over local identity.
-30
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
The decision to relocate the team appears to disregard the strong, deeply-rooted local fan base and community interests. The protest underscores how corporate decisions can marginalize local voices, reflecting a broader trend of prioritizing profit over community welfare.
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
April 1
The Athletics' planned relocation, bolstered by binding agreements and supportive state legislation, reflects a corporate decision that undermines local economic and community stability in favor of larger profit-driven interests. This shift raises concerns about corporate accountability and the devaluation of community ties.
- JUN142023
On June 14, 2023, the Nevada Legislature approved a public funding package for a portion of a proposed $1.5 billion stadium with a retractable roof, a key step in the Oakland Athletics’ plan to relocate to Las Vegas. The deal, which includes $380 million in public funding, exempts the team from property taxes and shifts infrastructure credits, sparking criticism over using taxpayer funds for a private enterprise.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
The legislative approval demonstrates a politically charged process where public funding is secured for corporate relocation, reinforcing corporate influence over public policy. Critics note that this complex deal diverts taxpayer resources to benefit a private enterprise, thereby privileging corporate interests over community needs.
Oakland Athletics stadium deal wins final legislative approval in Nevada as MLB weighs move to Vegas
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
April 1
The deal leverages significant taxpayer money—including exemptions from property taxes and diverted infrastructure credits—to secure a stadium that facilitates the Athletics’ relocation, reflecting a broader trend of public resources being used to benefit private, corporate interests at the expense of local communities.
Oakland Athletics stadium deal wins final legislative approval in Nevada as MLB weighs move to Vegas
- JUN142023
Amid plans to relocate to Las Vegas, the Oakland Athletics, under owner John Fisher, are embroiled in contentious political negotiations in Nevada. The franchise's lobbying for favorable legislative conditions and amendments—allegedly at the expense of the Oakland community—has sparked protests by fans and raised concerns about regulatory capture and corporate bypass of democratic checks.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 1
The Athletics' management is reported to have aggressively lobbied Nevada lawmakers to secure a relocation deal, reflecting a strategic yet ethically questionable use of political influence that undermines community interests and democratic processes.
Oakland Athletics fans' 'reverse boycott' no match for greed - USA TODAY
-50
Regulatory Capture
April 1
The legislative negotiations in Nevada, marked by favorable amendments and quiet deals, suggest a case of regulatory capture where political processes are manipulated to benefit corporate interests, further highlighting a structural undermining of public accountability.
Oakland Athletics fans' 'reverse boycott' no match for greed - USA TODAY
- JUN132023
On June 13, 2023, during a game marked by a reverse boycott protest over the planned relocation to Las Vegas, the Oakland A’s announced a donation of all ticket revenue ($811,107) to local charities, including the Alameda County Community Food Bank and the Oakland Public Education Fund. This move comes as fans demanded that owner John Fisher sell the team to keep it in Oakland.
+60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 1
The donation of all ticket revenue to local charities demonstrates a commendable commitment to community welfare and ethical business practices. By channeling $811,107 to support the Alameda County Community Food Bank and Oakland Public Education Fund, the Athletics show a proactive step in supporting the local community during a period of significant change.
Reverse boycott brings out Oakland A's fans - Chicago Tribune
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
April 1
The planned relocation of the Athletics to Las Vegas has sparked significant backlash from the local community. Moving the team away from Oakland is seen as undermining the local establishment and economic stability of the region, reflecting a decision that prioritizes profit over community interests.
Reverse boycott brings out Oakland A's fans - Chicago Tribune
- MAY292023
Nevada lawmakers questioned a proposal to subsidize a new retractable-roof stadium for the Oakland A’s with tax credits and bonds. Critics argue that using public funds for a team with poor recent performance and other public service challenges reflects corporate overreach and potential regulatory capture.
-80
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
The Athletics’ involvement in funding economic projections and pushing for public subsidies to finance the new stadium demonstrates a use of political influence to secure corporate benefits. This approach diverts resources from essential public services and exemplifies corporate behavior aimed at extracting public funds, a practice seen as highly problematic from an anti-fascist perspective.
Economic boost or big business hand-out? Nevada lawmakers consider A’s stadium financing
-60
Regulatory Capture
April 1
The financing plan relying on tax credits and bonds indicates potential regulatory capture, where public policy and resources are manipulated to favor the Athletics. This raises concerns about the equitable allocation of state funds and the broader impact on public services, reinforcing negative perceptions of corporate influence within government processes.
Economic boost or big business hand-out? Nevada lawmakers consider A’s stadium financing
Alternatives
Milwaukee, United States
50.33
Boston, United States
24.48
Kansas City, United States
11.56
Newark, United States
6.58
Philadelphia, United States
4.66
Saint Paul, United States
3.98
Detroit, United States
1.94
Washington, D.C., United States
-41.62
Columbus, United States
-51.77
Florence, Italy
63.58
Industries
- 711211
- Sports Teams and Clubs
- 711219
- Other Spectator Sports
- 711310
- Promoters of Performing Arts, Sports, and Similar Events with Facilities