Company Directory - National Science Foundation
Company Details - National Science Foundation

National Science Foundation
WebsiteAn independent federal agency in the U.S. that supports fundamental research and education in all the non-medical fields of science and engineering.
CCI Score
CCI Score: National Science Foundation
-59.22
0.03%
Latest Event
NSF Employee Layoffs Amid Federal Research Cuts
The National Science Foundation terminated 170 employees last month amid broader federal research cutbacks, sparking concerns from tech industry groups about the impact on scientific expertise and workforce stability.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
QUISLING
National Science Foundation is currently rated as a Quisling.
Latest Events
- MAR102025
The National Science Foundation terminated 170 employees last month amid broader federal research cutbacks, sparking concerns from tech industry groups about the impact on scientific expertise and workforce stability.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 1
The mass termination of 170 NSF employees, including key experts in AI and computer science, undermines fair labor practices and destabilizes the scientific workforce. This move, occurring amid broader federal cutbacks influenced by authoritarian-style budget policies, reflects negatively on the agency’s commitment to sustaining a robust, diverse scientific community.
Tech industry groups push back against federal research cuts
- FEB202025
NSF announced layoffs affecting about 10% of its workforce, firing 168 employees, including probationary staff and expert contract workers, as a part of compliance with an executive order from the Trump administration. The decision, which extended beyond the initially demanded cuts, sparked emotional backlash and harsh criticism from staff and lawmakers.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
NSF's decision to execute mass firings while citing adherence to Trump administration directives reflects a troubling alignment with authoritarian policies, showing complicity in broader political moves that undermine democratic accountability and workers' rights.
National Science Foundation Mass Firings Go Beyond Trump’s Orders, Sparking Outrage
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 1
The mass layoffs, including the dismissal of essential experts and probationary employees, demonstrate a disregard for fair labor practices and worker rights. The dehumanizing manner in which employees were treated—being locked out of their workstations and forced to resign—exacerbates the negative impact on employee welfare.
National Science Foundation Mass Firings Go Beyond Trump’s Orders, Sparking Outrage
- FEB042025
NSF is confronting the threat of massive layoffs and significant budget cuts following an official communication from the White House Office of Personnel Management. Senior leadership reportedly instructed staff to spread the message while ordering them not to discuss the news, a move raising concerns about transparency and worker rights amid politically driven cost-cutting measures.
-10
Executive Political Engagement
April 1
NSF’s leadership was compelled to disseminate sensitive information about looming layoffs and budget cuts while simultaneously restricting internal discussion. This top–down directive reflects a response to, and compliance with, politically pressured mandates, raising concerns about the agency’s democratic transparency and autonomy.
'My boss was crying.' NSF confronts potentially massive layoffs and budget cuts - Science
-30
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 1
The anticipated layoff of nearly half of NSF's workforce and the enforced prohibition on discussing these changes undermine worker rights and exacerbate fears among employees. This situation, driven by externally imposed budget cuts and political interference, raises serious ethical concerns regarding labor practices.
'My boss was crying.' NSF confronts potentially massive layoffs and budget cuts - Science
- JAN302025
The National Science Foundation has initiated a comprehensive review of its 40,000 grant portfolio to ensure compliance with President Trump’s directives targeting 'woke' initiatives. This involves temporarily blocking funds and archiving long-standing programs, a move that raises concerns around the integrity of the merit review process and the undermining of diversity, equity, and inclusion in scientific research.
-80
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
NSF’s directive to vet all grants in response to presidential orders represents a politicization of its traditionally merit-based award process. By aligning its policies with an authoritarian agenda that opposes diversity and inclusion, it undermines scientific autonomy and public trust in government-run research funding.
EXCLUSIVE: NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with Trump’s orders | Science | AAAS
-70
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 1
The preemptive vetting and archiving of established research programs disrupts the longstanding, merit-based grant process. This move, aimed at complying with politically motivated directives, compromises ethical standards in research funding and threatens the continuity of scientific inquiry, especially projects that enhance diversity and inclusion.
EXCLUSIVE: NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with Trump’s orders | Science | AAAS
- JAN302025
Following directives from President Donald Trump, the NSF halted access to funds and began reviewing billions in already-awarded grants for features deemed noncompliant with bans on 'woke' initiatives such as diversity, equity, inclusion, and support for environmental and social programs. The agency also archived longstanding programs that could contravene the executive orders, leaving researchers uncertain and jeopardizing academic freedom.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 1
NSF's decision to vet and potentially cancel grants as mandated by Trump’s directives demonstrates a capitulation to authoritarian political pressures. This action undermines academic freedom and diversity initiatives, aligning with repressive measures that compromise inclusivity and merit-based review. The political interference in the grant process represents a negative public and political behavior.
EXCLUSIVE: NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with Trump’s orders | Science | AAAS
- JAN302025
The National Science Foundation has initiated a review process of its already awarded grants, freezing funds and vetting projects for topics tied to diversity, equity, inclusion, and environmental initiatives in compliance with a series of presidential directives from Donald Trump. This policy shift has raised significant concerns among scientists and union representatives about academic freedom, ethical award practices, and worker rights.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 1
NSF’s decision to vet grants according to politically motivated criteria undermines academic freedom and promotes an environment where federal funding is allocated based on adherence to executive directives rather than merit. This action aligns with authoritarian policies, compromising the integrity of scientific research.
EXCLUSIVE: NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with Trump’s orders | Science | AAAS
-50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 1
The vetting process places NSF employees, including program officers and researchers, in a precarious position by asking them to override established merit review protocols in favor of politically dictated criteria. This approach not only jeopardizes scientific integrity but also exposes staff to ethical and legal risks, undermining labor rights.
EXCLUSIVE: NSF starts vetting all grants to comply with Trump’s orders | Science | AAAS
- FEB062024
A new interim staff report from the House Judiciary Committee released on February 6, 2024 alleges that the National Science Foundation provided multi‐million‐dollar grants to university and non-profit research teams to develop AI-driven censorship and propaganda tools. The projects are said to aim at restricting dissenting viewpoints and blacklisting media critical of NSF-funded efforts.
-80
Provision of Repressive Technologies
April 1
The report details that NSF is funding technologies designed to censor online speech and produce propaganda, effectively equipping state or corporate actors with repressive tools that undermine democratic discourse. This funding aligns with the provision of repressive technologies which support authoritarian practices.
Alternatives

Singapore, Singapore
49.00

United States
19.13
Canada
0.00

United States
57.77

Geneva, Switzerland
54.72
Canada
49.33

India
46.76

Washington, D.C., United States
8.87
Bethesda, United States
-11.29

Corporation
63.88
Industries
- 541715
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
- 541720
- Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
- 923120
- Administration of Public Health Programs