Company Directory - National Immigration Litigation Alliance
Company Details - National Immigration Litigation Alliance

National Immigration Litigation Alliance
WebsiteThe National Immigration Litigation Alliance is a legal advocacy organization that provides representation for immigrants and challenges restrictive immigration policies. It works to promote justice and safeguard the rights of vulnerable communities through impactful litigation and policy reform efforts.
CCI Score
CCI Score: National Immigration Litigation Alliance
66.69
-0.03%
Latest Event
NILA Defends Immigrant Rights by Blocking Authoritarian Deportation Policy
Representing migrants in court, NILA's lawyer Trina Realmuto contributed to a successful lawsuit that obtained a nationwide temporary restraining order against the Trump administration's fast-tracking of deportations, thereby ensuring due process for affected individuals.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support NILA by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
LEADER
National Immigration Litigation Alliance is currently rated as a Leader.
Latest Events
- MAR282025
Representing migrants in court, NILA's lawyer Trina Realmuto contributed to a successful lawsuit that obtained a nationwide temporary restraining order against the Trump administration's fast-tracking of deportations, thereby ensuring due process for affected individuals.
- JAN022025
On January 2, 2025, NCLA's legal challenge contributed to the U.S. State Department shuttering its Global Engagement Center, which had financed censorship technology that blacklisted domestic news organizations. NCLA hailed the move as a positive step in safeguarding free press and defending First Amendment rights.
+85
Public and Political Behavior
March 28
By actively challenging government censorship practices, NCLA has promoted an open, free press environment and resisted authoritarian tendencies. Their involvement in litigation against the State Department’s use of censorship technology underscores a strong stance against repressive state practices, which is a positive action from an anti-fascist perspective.
In NCLA Victory Against Censorship, State Department Shutters Global Engagement Center
- FEB212024
The organization released a 10-step proposal urging the Biden administration to undertake executive actions to improve immigration processes, prioritize humanitarian initiatives, and dismantle punitive measures such as mass detention and harsh enforcement. The proposal emphasizes reclaiming the immigration narrative and shifting policy away from extremism and fear-based strategies.
+80
Executive Political Engagement
March 28
The legal advocacy group's call for executive action to reform immigration policy reflects a proactive stance against authoritarian enforcement measures. By highlighting the need to pivot away from punitive practices and address systemic human rights concerns, the proposal contributes to a progressive, anti-fascist agenda that challenges harsh, far-right immigration policies.
- DEC062023
On December 6, 2023, NCLA filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas challenging the U.S. State Department's funding of censorship technologies that target conservative media outlets. The legal action, which includes the participation of The Daily Wire, The Federalist, and the State of Texas, argues that this funding violates First Amendment protections by suppressing free speech.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
March 28
By launching a lawsuit against a government-funded censorship scheme, NCLA takes a strong stand in defense of free speech and constitutional rights. This legal challenge directly opposes authoritarian practices and government overreach that suppress dissenting voices, aligning with anti-fascist principles.
NCLA Launches Lawsuit Against U.S. State Department-Funded Censorship Regime
+70
Technology and Services Impact
March 28
The lawsuit explicitly challenges the misuse of technology for political censorship. By bringing attention to how repressive technologies are developed, tested, and marketed with government funds, NCLA condemns the instrumental role of technology in facilitating state-sponsored suppression of free speech, a key anti-authoritarian action.
NCLA Launches Lawsuit Against U.S. State Department-Funded Censorship Regime
- JUL202021
On July 20, 2021, a federal district court in Oakland approved a final settlement in Vangala v. USCIS, a case brought by NILA alongside NWIRP and the Van Der Hout law firm. The settlement mandates USCIS to accept over 60,000 humanitarian applications that were previously rejected under a Trump-era policy, thereby preventing a practice seen as a pretext to deny benefits to vulnerable applicants.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
March 28
The approval of this settlement marks a significant victory against an exclusionary, authoritarian immigration policy enacted during the Trump administration. By actively challenging and overturning a policy that unfairly rejected humanitarian applications, NILA has advanced public and political behavior aiming to protect vulnerable immigrant communities and uphold justice. This action is strongly aligned with anti-fascist values and reinforces democratic accountability in public policy.
- SEP012019
In September 2019, the National Immigration Litigation Alliance (NILA), in collaboration with several immigrant rights organizations, filed a nationwide class action lawsuit against USCIS, ICE, and DHS. The lawsuit challenges the prolonged delays in releasing A-Files, government records critical for immigrants to defend themselves in deportation proceedings, thereby affirming the rights of marginalized immigrant communities.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
March 28
The class action filing by NILA directly challenges authoritarian delays in providing essential legal documents to immigrants, reinforcing due process and the rights of marginalized communities. This proactive public and political behavior stands as a strong anti-authoritarian measure that aligns with progressive values.
Nationwide Class Action Affirms Immigrants’ Rights to their A-Files — Impact Fund
Alternatives

Dominican Republic
55.47

Las Vegas, United States
40.00

Los Angeles, United States
32.83

New York City, USA
81.11
United States
80.00

Oakland, United States
74.74
Toronto, Canada
73.25

Chicago, United States
72.38

Chicago, United States
68.19

Washington, D.C., United States
67.02
Industries
- 541110
- Offices of Lawyers
- 541191
- Title Abstract and Settlement Offices
- 541199
- All Other Legal Services