MSG's deployment of facial recognition technology to identify and ban individuals critical of its CEO demonstrates the use of repressive technology to silence dissent. This targeted surveillance not only infringes on personal privacy but also contributes to an authoritarian environment by discouraging free expression through punitive measures.

Madison Square Garden Bans Fan After Surveillance System IDs Him as a Critic of Its CEO

By providing a venue for a rally featuring Donald Trump—a figure associated with authoritarian and divisive rhetoric—and not distancing itself from the controversial content (including derogatory jokes about Puerto Rico), MSG Entertainment is seen as indirectly legitimizing far-right ideologies. This decision contributes to public and political behaviors that can enable authoritarian narratives.

Trump says it was ‘my honor to be involved’ in controversial Madison Square Garden rally

By providing its venue for a Trump campaign rally marked by racist, hateful commentary—a situation that echoes the 1939 Nazi rally held at the same location—MSG Entertainment is seen as indirectly enabling far-right authoritarian activities. This hosting decision reinforces a pattern of complicity in politically charged events that propagate extremist ideologies.

With racist Madison Square Garden rally, Trump and his allies prove Democrats’ point

By hosting Donald Trump’s rally, MSG Entertainment is seen as providing a platform that normalizes authoritarian and fascist rhetoric. The decision to allow the event at a major cultural and sports venue can be interpreted as contributing to the legitimization of divisive, far-right politics, which is counter to anti-fascist principles.

‘Pure Fascism’: Authoritarianism Expert Breaks Down Trump’s Madison Square Garden Rally

By renting its venue for Trump's rally—an event aligned with divisive, authoritarian rhetoric—MSG Entertainment contributes to the normalization of extremist political activity. Given the venue's historical use for a range of political events, including those with far-right associations, hosting such an event raises concerns about corporate complicity in promoting authoritarian ideologies.

Trump rally at Madison Square Garden follows a long tradition in politics

MSG Entertainment's employment of facial recognition technology has resulted in the ejection of patrons under dubious pretenses, a practice viewed as an instrument of discrimination and chilling of free speech. This repressive use of technology has drawn severe criticism from privacy advocates and elected officials, reflecting a misstep in upholding ethical standards and civil liberties.

Elected Officials & Privacy Advocates Demand MSG Entertainment End Use of Facial Recognition Technology on Fans

By donating the maximum allowed amounts to multiple City Council campaigns, MSG PAC appears to seek influence over the permit renewal process for its flagship venue. This strategic funding, particularly amid ongoing debates over the arena permit, represents an effort to sway political outcomes in favor of corporate interests, which is concerning from a democratic accountability perspective.

Madison Square Garden PAC Funds Council Members Who’ll Vote on Arena’s Future

The company's use of facial recognition technology to deny entry to employees of law firms engaged in lawsuits poses significant civil rights concerns. This practice, defended by MSG as a measure against litigious activity, appears to adopt repressive surveillance methods that undermine transparency and legal accountability, aligning with authoritarian tactics.

Madison Square Garden PAC Funds Council Members Who’ll Vote on Arena’s Future

The lobbying efforts are directed at influencing the local regulatory approval process, suggesting an attempt at regulatory capture that could weaken oversight and reinforce corporate power over public policy.

MSG has so far spent $500K lobbying NYC as it pursues permit, records show

MSG's expenditure of $500K on lobbying to influence the permitting process raises concerns about undue corporate influence over public regulatory processes. Such financial efforts to sway political decisions can contribute to eroding democratic accountability and are viewed negatively from an anti‑fascist perspective.

MSG has so far spent $500K lobbying NYC as it pursues permit, records show

The use of facial recognition technology to target and exclude lawyers involved in litigation reflects a troubling deployment of repressive technology. This practice not only risks infringing on civil rights but also promotes an environment where dissent and legal challenge may be stifled, aligning with authoritarian approaches.

Everything We Know About the Facial Recognition Scandal at Madison Square Garden

The use of facial recognition technology by MSG Entertainment to identify and deny access to lawyers raises significant concerns about the provision of repressive technologies. This practice, potentially hindering access to legal recourse and fostering discriminatory outcomes, is indicative of a repressive use of modern technology.

Attorney General James Seeks Information from Madison Square Garden Regarding Use of Facial Recognition Technology to Deny Entry to Venues

The deployment of advanced facial recognition technology to systematically scan, eject, and ban individuals—including legal professionals and dissenters—from venues is a clear example of using repressive technologies. This practice not only invades privacy but fosters an environment of authoritarian control over public access.

MSG and Radio City Use Facial Recognition to Ban Critics From Venues

The application of facial recognition technology in this context not only facilitates exclusion but also risks reinforcing existing biases and contributing to discriminatory outcomes. Its use for punitive and adversarial purposes highlights concerns surrounding the provision of repressive technologies that can infringe on civil liberties and disproportionately harm marginalized groups.

Madison Square Garden's facial recognition policy ignites debate