Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. is documented by OpenSecrets as having made political contributions during the 2024 election cycle. In a climate where corporate political donations can indirectly support authoritarian policies, such contributions are concerning from a public and political behavior perspective. While the exact recipients and ideological leanings of these donations are not explicitly detailed, the act of influencing political outcomes through funding raises issues about corporate complicity in undermining democratic accountability.

Madison Square Garden Profile: Recipients • OpenSecrets

The company’s clear delineation of ethical supply chain practices in its Supplier Code of Conduct demonstrates accountability and transparency in sourcing. This adherence to ethical standards minimizes the risk of human rights abuses in the supply chain, thereby reducing potential complicity in broader authoritarian practices.

Supplier Code of Conduct

The company's aggressive lobbying—employing both its in-house government relations team and high-profile legal consultants to influence city officials on issues such as the Madison Square Garden special permit and facial recognition policies—exemplifies a concerning degree of regulatory capture that prioritizes corporate interests over public accountability.

MSG kingpin James Dolan and associates gave generously to Mayor Adams amid NYC business interests

The Sustainability Report details a comprehensive Supplier Code of Conduct and responsible sourcing practices. These measures ensure that suppliers adhere to high ethical standards, aligning with international labor standards and responsible business practices.

SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2023

MSG Family of Companies has engaged in regulatory capture by making substantial political donations, including contributions to the Mayor’s Fund. These financial moves are designed to influence regulatory decisions and secure favorable government contracts, thereby eroding transparency and reinforcing corporate dominance over public policy.

Madison Square Garden PAC Funds Council Members Who’ll Vote on Arena’s Future

The firm’s strategic political contributions, including donations to the Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York City, indicate attempts to influence local governance and regulatory outcomes. Such financial engagements are seen as efforts to shape policy in ways that prioritize corporate interests over public accountability, reinforcing problematic power dynamics.

Madison Square Garden PAC Funds Council Members Who’ll Vote on Arena’s Future

MSG's reported expenditure of $500K on lobbying efforts to secure an operating permit in New York City indicates a substantial engagement in political influence. This level of spending raises concerns that the company is leveraging its financial power to secure favorable regulatory outcomes, potentially undermining democratic accountability and contributing to an environment of corporate regulatory capture—a key marker of complicity in authoritarian practices.

MSG has so far spent $500K lobbying NYC as it pursues permit, records show

MSGE, under the MSG Family of Companies umbrella, employs facial recognition technology at its venues to screen and, in some cases, exclude individuals such as attorneys involved in litigation. This practice exemplifies the provision of repressive technologies by enabling surveillance that invades privacy and may facilitate discrimination. The heavy reliance on such technologies in private spaces, combined with problematic legal outcomes under less protective regulatory frameworks (e.g. New York’s notice law compared to stricter standards like Illinois’ BIPA), reflects a disturbing alignment with authoritarian methods that suppress dissent and marginalize vulnerable groups.

A State of Surveillance: The Laws Governing Facial Recognition Technology at Madison Square Garden

The detailed assessment of supply chain practices, including routine audits, risk assessments, and due diligence processes described in the statement, reflects a high level of commitment to ethical sourcing. This emphasis on supply chain ethics mitigates the risk of forced labor and human trafficking, aligning with progressive human rights principles.

M Group Services - Modern Slavery & Human Trafficking Statement

The use of facial recognition technology by MSG is emblematic of a broader trend towards deploying surveillance tools that can restrict access and potentially be used for discriminatory practices. This technology, employed to ban individuals under certain circumstances, aligns with authoritarian measures that suppress individual freedoms and privacy, making it a significant complicity in repressive practices.

Facial recognition technology at MSG scrutinized by New York City Council

The exclusion policy, which bars attorneys actively engaged in litigation from entering MSG venues, raises serious ethical and human rights concerns. Critics argue that this practice not only undermines fair access to public services but also represents a potentially discriminatory business practice. The pushback from legal authorities underscores the problematic nature of using corporate policies to sidestep accountability, echoing broader issues of ethical responsibility in business practices.

Madison Square Garden CEO doubles down on use of facial recognition tech

MSG Entertainment's use of facial recognition technology to enforce a policy that bans lawyers involved in litigation from its venues is a concerning example of repressive technology being used to limit access to legal redress. This measure not only undermines civil rights but also creates a chilling effect on the willingness of attorneys to take on cases against the company, reflecting practices that align with authoritarian control.

Madison Square Garden uses face recognition to keep out enemy lawyers. That may be illegal.

Beyond technology concerns, MSG's policy has raised serious issues regarding ethical business practices. The exclusion of individuals based on data-driven criteria, and the potential for discriminatory outcomes, undermines commitments to human rights and equitable treatment. Critics argue that such practices contribute to a broader culture of surveillance and social control.

Madison Square Garden's facial recognition policy ignites debate

MSG Family of Companies has transparently disclosed its strategy to comply with the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, indicating thorough analysis and mitigation of human rights and environmental risks in its supply chains. This proactive stance supports ethical sourcing and labor standards, earning a positive score.

Supply Chain Due Diligence Act

Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s board members, as highlighted in the article, have contributed substantial funds to a campaign of a Republican representative known for supporting authoritarian policies and anti-democratic actions. This political contribution not only supports a pro-Trump agenda but also aligns the company with far-right ideologies, undermining democratic values and worker rights. The financial support provided to a candidate with a record of opposing progressive policies and engaging in extremist legislative practices underscores the company's complicity in the broader systemic issue of rising authoritarianism.

Knicks’ Dolan Dynasty Goes All-In For NYC’s Only Republican Rep, Nicole Malliotakis