Company Directory - Irving Oil
Company Details - Irving Oil
Irving Oil
Saint John, Canada
Irving Oil is a Canadian oil and gas company based in Saint John, New Brunswick. It is well-known for its oil refinery and various related operations, providing products and services in the energy sector.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Irving Oil
-40.09
0.02%
Latest Event
Irving Oil Leadership Shakeup and Regulatory Resistance
Irving Oil announced major leadership changes with Arthur Irving stepping down as chairman and Sarah Irving leaving the leadership team as part of a strategic review. In addition, the company has faced scrutiny for its resistance to federal clean-fuel regulations, a move that highlights its preference for maintaining existing profit structures over embracing regulatory changes aimed at reducing environmental impact.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Irving Oil is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- OCT182023
Irving Oil announced major leadership changes with Arthur Irving stepping down as chairman and Sarah Irving leaving the leadership team as part of a strategic review. In addition, the company has faced scrutiny for its resistance to federal clean-fuel regulations, a move that highlights its preference for maintaining existing profit structures over embracing regulatory changes aimed at reducing environmental impact.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
April 2
The leadership shakeup, notably with longstanding family executives stepping back and maintaining an advisory role, raises concerns about entrenched power structures and opaque governance practices that can enable autocratic decision-making. This internal restructuring can reduce accountability and contribute indirectly to a climate where authoritarian practices flourish.
Arthur Irving out as chairman of Irving Oil in wake of strategic review
-30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 2
Irving Oil’s resistance to federal clean-fuel regulations, which aim to mitigate environmental damage and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, underscores a prioritization of corporate profitability over environmental and community welfare. This stance, while common in the fossil fuel sector, has adverse social and environmental implications that align with practices favoring entrenched power over public well‐being.
Arthur Irving out as chairman of Irving Oil in wake of strategic review
- JAN312023
In January 2023, Irving Oil emerged as the busiest lobbyist in Canada’s oil and gas sector, holding 18 meetings with federal officials including key ministries. The extensive lobbying efforts are viewed as an attempt to delay climate action and secure additional subsidies, raising concerns about undue corporate influence on public policy.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 2
Irving Oil held a significant number of lobbying meetings (18) in January 2023, positioning itself as a dominant force in influencing federal policy at a time when the fossil fuel industry is actively working to delay climate action and secure subsidies. This behavior is indicative of corporate practices that prioritize narrow business interests over public and environmental welfare, aligning with authoritarian and anti-democratic tendencies by exerting undue influence on policy-making.
Irving tops list of busiest oil & gas lobbyists for second month in a row
- JAN262023
Irving Oil repeatedly lobbied federal officials, seeking changes in the Clean Fuel Regulations that would allow credits for exported fossil fuels. The company's president and executive team pursued multiple meetings with government representatives to request regulatory concessions, aiming to relieve the financial burden associated with environmental compliance, including an investment in electrolyzer technology. These efforts, detailed in briefing notes and government documents, reflect a strategy to influence policy in favor of corporate interests, potentially undermining environmental protections.
-60
Regulatory Capture
April 2
The company's efforts to alter the Clean Fuel Regulations and secure exemptions or concessions reflect a broader attempt at regulatory capture. By pushing to have environmental compliance costs mitigated, Irving Oil is effectively seeking to influence the framework of regulatory oversight in a way that prioritizes its economic interests over environmental accountability, posing risks to public welfare.
Inside Irving Oil's repeated push to change federal pollution rules
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 2
Irving Oil's persistent and high-level engagement with federal officials for regulatory concessions demonstrates a concerning level of executive political engagement. These repeated lobbying efforts, including planned meetings and direct appeals to influential government ministers, indicate an attempt to shape public policy in a way that prioritizes corporate profit over public and environmental well-being.
Inside Irving Oil's repeated push to change federal pollution rules
- JAN262023
Irving Oil repeatedly pushed federal officials to amend the Clean Fuel Regulations so that its exported fossil fuels could generate compliance credits, a move aimed at reducing its own expenses but undermining environmental safeguards.
-70
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 2
Irving Oil engaged in aggressive lobbying to alter environmental regulations in its favor. By seeking to secure exemptions for exported fuels and challenging established pollution rules, the company prioritized its short-term financial interests over robust environmental protection, reflecting corporate interference in public policy that could weaken regulatory standards.
Inside Irving Oil's repeated push to change federal pollution rules
- JAN262023
Irving Oil pursued repeated lobbying efforts with government officials to change federal Clean Fuel Regulations, seeking an exemption for its Atlantic refinery that would count exported fuel as having lower carbon intensity. These efforts aimed to reduce compliance costs and avoid substantial emissions reduction investments despite significant environmental impacts.
-80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 2
Irving Oil engaged in significant lobbying to alter federal pollution rules. By attempting to secure credits for exported fuels, the company sought to sidestep costly emissions reduction measures, demonstrating a willingness to influence regulatory frameworks for its benefit at the expense of environmental and public health standards.
Inside Irving Oil's repeated push to change federal pollution rules
-60
Executive Political Engagement
April 2
The involvement of company president Ian Whitcomb in coordinating meetings and engaging directly with high-ranking government officials underscores Irving Oil's executive political engagement. This proactive political maneuvering to secure favorable regulatory adjustments reveals a prioritization of corporate profit over stringent environmental safeguards.
Inside Irving Oil's repeated push to change federal pollution rules
- APR162020
Irving Oil was fined $200,000 after pleading guilty to a safety violation following the Thanksgiving 2018 explosion and fire at its Saint John refinery. This incident highlights significant lapses in maintaining worker and community safety, raising concerns over the company’s commitment to ethical labor practices.
-40
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 2
The safety violation and subsequent fine indicate a failure to uphold essential worker safety standards and rights. Such negligence undermines labor relations and human rights, showing a corporate culture that prioritizes cost-cutting over the well-being of workers and the community.
Irving Oil fined $200,000 after pleading guilty to safety violation
- OCT082018
Irving Oil Limited was fined $200K after pleading guilty to violating the Occupational Health and Safety Act in connection with a 2018 refinery explosion that injured multiple workers. The incident, which occurred on October 8, 2018, led to injuries including physical harm and psychological stress among 80 workers, with 36 suffering lost work time.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 2
Irving Oil's guilty plea and subsequent fine for violating occupational health and safety standards demonstrate a failure to protect worker rights and safety. The incident resulted in significant worker injuries and time lost, highlighting inadequate labor practices and a disregard for employee wellbeing.
Irving Oil fined $200K in connection with 2018 refinery explosion
- OCT082018
Irving Oil was fined $200,000 after pleading guilty to violating New Brunswick’s Occupational Health and Safety Act in connection with the 2018 refinery explosion in Saint John that injured dozens of workers.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 2
The fine and guilty plea for violating occupational health and safety standards highlight Irving Oil's failure to protect its workforce, as shown by the severe injuries sustained by workers during the 2018 refinery explosion. This event is a clear indicator of lax labor and safety practices, which undermines workers' rights and ethical business conduct.
Irving Oil fined $200,000 in connection with 2018 refinery explosion
Alternatives
New Delhi, India
-30.36
Corporation
-28.08
Calgary, Canada
26.20
Mumbai, India
37.56
Houston, United States
-31.52
Irving, United States
-38.85
San Ramon, United States
-53.10
Calgary, Canada
-14.63
Seoul, South Korea
22.96
London, United Kingdom
-12.46
Industries
- 324110
- Petroleum Refineries
- 324121
- Asphalt Paving Mixture and Block Manufacturing
- 324199
- All Other Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing
- 424720
- Petroleum and Petroleum Products Merchant Wholesalers (except Bulk Stations and Terminals)
- 486110
- Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil
- 447190
- Other Gasoline Stations