ExxonMobil's decision to stall on including a process safety representative in its contract negotiations deviates significantly from established labor safety practices. This refusal not only exposes workers to increased risk by neglecting essential safety measures but also reflects a broader disregard for labor rights and fair treatment, which is particularly concerning from an anti-fascist and pro-worker rights perspective.

ExxonMobil Stalls in Accepting Industry Pattern Agreement During Contract Talks at Baton Rouge, La., Facility

The PAC contribution data indicates that ExxonMobil's affiliated political action committee directs over 70% of its contributions to Republican candidates. This financial pattern supports political figures associated with authoritarian policies and undermines democratic accountability. Such targeted funding can help entrench policies that favor corporate interests over public welfare, aligning with trends in political behavior that bolster far-right agendas.

PAC Profile: Exxon Mobil

ExxonMobil's refusal to engage in meaningful collective bargaining by not negotiating supervisor PTO review and retaliating against union grievances demonstrates a disregard for workers' rights and fair labor practices. This undermining of labor protections contributes to conditions that can facilitate authoritarian workplace control.

ExxonMobil v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 23-60495 (5th Cir. 2025)

ExxonMobil’s refusal to negotiate in good faith with its union—refusing to address key issues around PTO review and paid parental leave—demonstrates a significant violation of labor rights. The administrative law judge and subsequent court ruling affirm that the company’s actions not only breached the National Labor Relations Act but also undermined worker protections and fair labor practices. This conduct reflects a broader pattern of prioritizing corporate interests over employee rights, thereby contributing to the rise of authoritarian practices by weakening organized labor.

ExxonMobil v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 23-60495 (5th Cir. 2025)

ExxonMobil's significant political contributions and lobbying expenditures, as shown by the $1.88 million in contributions and $6.82 million in lobbying during the 2024 cycle, indicate a robust effort to influence political decision-making. This involvement raises red flags from an anti-fascist perspective by potentially supporting policies that undermine democratic accountability and facilitate authoritarian practices.

Exxon Mobil Profile: Summary

Exxon Mobil's high levels of political contributions and lobbying expenditures in the 2024 cycle, combined with evidence of a revolving door connecting government and corporate positions, indicate a strategic use of financial power to potentially influence policy decisions in ways that favor authoritarian and anti-democratic interests. This political behavior is deeply concerning from an anti-fascist perspective as it undermines transparency and democratic accountability.

Exxon Mobil Profile: Summary

Exxon Mobil has demonstrated a strong presence in political lobbying with $6.82 million spent in 2024, complemented by notable campaign contributions ($1,885,072) alongside a revolving door of former government officials as lobbyists. This involvement is perceived as supporting policy environments conducive to deregulation and authoritarian practices, ultimately undermining democratic mechanisms and contributing to the rise of fascism.

Exxon Mobil Profile: Summary • OpenSecrets

ExxonMobil's historical track record of misleading the public regarding climate change coupled with the recent allegations involving the exploitation of hacked data to counter legal actions reflects significant ethical shortcomings in its business practices. This pattern of questionable ethics raises concerns about corporate accountability and the company’s commitment to responsible behavior.

U.S. probes hacking campaign that targeted climate activists : NPR

The disclosed lobbying expenditure of $1,540,000 underscores Exxon Mobil’s active engagement in shaping policy debates, often to protect fossil fuel interests at the expense of public welfare and environmental accountability. From an anti-fascist perspective, such corporate political interventions can contribute to regressive policy outcomes that undermine democratic processes and social justice.

Lobbying Update: $1,540,000 of EXXON MOBIL CORP lobbying was just disclosed

ExxonMobil’s contribution of at least $344,750 to members of Congress opposing federal voting rights legislation indicates the company is engaging in political activities that may undermine democratic processes. This financial support is interpreted as aligning with anti-democratic, authoritarian tendencies by bolstering lawmakers whose agendas may restrict civil liberties and voting rights.

ExxonMobil Political Contributions Tracker

ExxonMobil's supplier, vendor, and contractor expectations emphasize rigorous compliance, anti-corruption measures, and safety standards. By mandating these practices, the company reduces the risk of unethical practices within its supply chain and supports a framework that resists corruption and exploitation—values consistent with anti-authoritarian and pro-worker principles.

Supplier, vendor and contractor expectations

ExxonMobil’s PAC contributions, as highlighted in its online political contribution data, indicate an active role in funding political processes. Under a left-leaning scrutiny, such financial engagements are seen as potentially bolstering candidates and policies that may align with authoritarian or far-right interests. This involvement raises concerns about corporate influence on government and the democratic process, warranting a negative rating in the Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts category.

Political contribution data

The legal validation of Exxon Mobil’s prolonged lockout of union workers, although deemed legal by the court, represents a troubling exercise in labor suppression. The decision effectively endorses tactics that weaken union influence and worker bargaining power, which are highly concerning from an anti-fascist perspective that champions robust labor rights and protections. Such practices are seen as a mechanism to consolidate corporate power at the expense of democratic labor participation.

Judge Rules Exxon’s Texas Refinery Union Lockout Was Legal

The involvement in a hack-and-leak operation indicates a misuse of technological capabilities to interfere with legal proceedings and suppress dissent. This reflects a concerning trend in the application of repressive cyber tactics, aligning with authoritarian approaches to manage opposition.

ExxonMobil and Lobbyist Face Scrutiny Over Cyber Espionage

ExxonMobil's extended lockout of union workers, although legally justified by the labor board judge, represents a strategy to undermine worker rights and pressure the union to accept unfavorable contract terms. This action is viewed as exploiting labor relations and weakening collective bargaining power.

ExxonMobil's Union Worker Lockout Legal, Labor Board Judge Says

The company's aggressive lobbying to safeguard over $110 billion in fossil fuel subsidies and its maneuvering in economic channels demonstrate a deliberate effort to influence policy-making for its own benefit, further entrenching economic structures that favor authoritarian governance and undermine democratic accountability.

ExxonMobil's Event at the DNC Raises Red Flags

By channeling funds that indirectly bolster conservative advisory networks linked to Project 2025, ExxonMobil contributes to an economic ecosystem that supports policies aligned with authoritarian objectives. Such financial engagements enhance the economic leverage of groups that may undermine democratic institutions.

Fact Check: Coors, Walmart and ExxonMobil Contributed Money to Project 2025's Heritage Foundation

The report extends its ethical commitments to its suppliers by insisting on responsible sourcing and respect for human rights throughout its supply chain. This approach helps mitigate risks of complicity in unethical practices and reinforces a positive, anti‑authoritarian business practice.

PDF 2023 Sustainability Report - ExxonMobil

The report highlights ExxonMobil's commitment to upholding human rights and fair labor practices within its operations and supply chain, signaling an effort to protect marginalized communities and promote anti-authoritarian labor standards.

Respecting human rights

The revolving door phenomenon, with a large proportion of Exxon Mobil lobbyists coming from previous government roles, underscores a pattern of executive political engagement that undermines public accountability and may bolster authoritarian outcomes.

Exxon Mobil Profile: Summary • OpenSecrets

ExxonMobil's political contributions to members of Congress who have opposed federal voting rights legislation raise serious concerns from an anti-fascist perspective. By financially supporting politicians with anti-democratic stances, the company appears complicit in undermining democratic principles and facilitating policies that can lead to authoritarian outcomes.

ExxonMobil Political Contributions Tracker

The settlement over a 22-year-old human rights case, involving allegations of torture, rape, and abuse by security personnel contracted by ExxonMobil, highlights severe lapses in upholding labor and human rights practices. Although the financial settlement provided some closure for the victims, the decision to settle out of court without full public accountability indicates a failure in ethical business practices and contributes to broader concerns about corporate complicity in human rights abuses.

After 22 Years, ExxonMobil Finally Settles Indonesian Human Rights Case

The settlement marks a positive, albeit limited, step toward justice for marginalized communities suffering from severe human rights abuses. By providing compensation to the victims, ExxonMobil indirectly acknowledges the severity of the allegations. However, the confidential nature of the settlement and the company's longstanding denial highlight ongoing concerns regarding corporate accountability and transparency in handling human rights issues.

After 22 Years, ExxonMobil Finally Settles Indonesian Human Rights Case

The long-running lawsuit, which included serious allegations such as torture against Aceh villagers, highlights ongoing issues in ExxonMobil's business practices related to human rights. Although the company condemned the alleged abuses, the need to settle after two decades suggests a failure to address the systemic impacts on marginalized communities, thereby negatively impacting its ethical responsibility in labor relations and human rights practices.

Indonesia: After two decades, ExxonMobil settles case of alleged human rights abuses including torture brought by Aceh villagers

ExxonMobil's settlement of a longstanding lawsuit alleging human rights abuses in Aceh, Indonesia, reflects a troubling record in upholding ethical labor and human rights practices. Although the company condemned the reported actions, the resolution of the case without a full accountability process underscores complicity in a broader landscape of human rights violations, contributing to a negative impact on its overall corporate ethics profile.

Indonesia: After two decades, ExxonMobil settles case of alleged human rights abuses including torture brought by Aceh villagers

Exxon Mobil’s settlement of a human rights lawsuit in Indonesia, where contracted security forces were accused of torture and murder, reflects serious deficiencies in its business practices and ethical responsibility. The company’s failure to thoroughly vet and oversee its contractors in a region experiencing unrest not only resulted in grave human rights abuses but also underscores a broader pattern of corporate indifference to ethical standards.

Exxon settles Indonesia torture case that led to SEC official's ouster

Exxon Mobil was involved in a protracted human rights lawsuit where local villagers claimed that contracted security personnel committed serious abuses including murder and torture. The incident underscores significant failures in upholding labor and human rights standards, marking a negative impact on ethical business practices.

Exxon settles Indonesia torture case that led to SEC official's ouster

The settlement of a lawsuit alleging torture and severe human rights abuses highlights significant issues in ExxonMobil's labor relations and overall ethical responsibility. While the company publicly condemned the abuses, the confidential settlement underscores its failure to fully account for and rectify systemic human rights violations in its operational practices, reflecting negatively from an anti-fascist, human rights perspective.

ExxonMobil settles decades-old torture case with Indonesian villagers - BBC

ExxonMobil’s settlement in a long-running case involving allegations of torture and severe human rights abuses signals serious ethical issues in its business practices. Despite issuing a statement of condemnation, the resolution of a decades‑long legal battle over violent abuses—ranging from beatings to sexual assault—reveals a troubling pattern of complicity through contractors, raising major concerns regarding corporate responsibility.

ExxonMobil settles decades-old torture case with Indonesian villagers - BBC

ExxonMobil's attempt to settle labor disputes involved a deal that potentially violated federal labor law by undermining the collective bargaining rights of workers, including provisions for hiring temporary replacement workers during lockouts. This decision by the NLRB reflects significant concerns regarding the company's labor practices and an exploitation of workers’ rights.

ExxonMobil's Deal With Union Rejected After Abruzzo's Appeal (1)

The EEOC lawsuit highlights a failure by Exxon Mobil to protect its employees by inadequately addressing racially offensive conduct at its Baton Rouge facility. This directly implicates the company's labor relations and human rights practices, undermining efforts to maintain a safe and inclusive workplace for marginalized communities.

Exxon Mobil Corporation Sued by EEOC for Race Discrimination

ExxonMobil's handling of the labor dispute, including a prolonged lockout and actions to decertify the union, highlights practices that undermine worker rights and fair labor standards. The reported actions suggest a pattern that suppresses union power and is indicative of broader unethical labor practices, contributing to corporate complicity in authoritarian tendencies by prioritizing corporate interests over fair labor treatment.

USW members, ExxonMobil set to meet in federal court Monday

ExxonMobil's allocation of $300,000 to five national political organizations and over $258,000 to state-level candidates and committees in 2023 signals a deliberate strategy to influence political outcomes in favor of corporate interests. This activity, by bolstering entities that often support policies undermining democratic practices, is concerning from an anti-fascist perspective and contributes to the broader pattern of corporate political influence.

Political contributions

ExxonMobil’s use of political contributions demonstrates a strategic deployment of corporate resources to influence public policy in favor of its interests. While the contributions are legally compliant and routinely audited, they reinforce corporate influence in political processes, which can undermine equitable democratic participation and amplify power imbalances.

Political contributions

The report reveals ExxonMobil’s extensive participation in regulatory processes and legislative engagements. This involvement, aimed at influencing policy outcomes and protecting corporate interests, is indicative of potential regulatory capture. Such efforts, even if transparent, tend to undermine the broader societal and environmental benefits that could counteract authoritarian influences in policymaking.

2023 Advocacy Report - ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil’s consolidation of its political and climate lobbying reports highlights an active involvement in influencing policy through lobbying. From an anti-fascist standpoint, this continued exertion of political pressure amplifies corporate power in a way that may undermine democratic institutions and contribute to authoritarian practices.

Advocacy: Political Activity Reports

ExxonMobil’s political contributions, as reported in the article, demonstrate a deliberate corporate strategy to influence political outcomes. The company’s donation to multiple political organizations and candidate committees reflects a prioritization of corporate interests over democratic accountability. Such practices contribute to the erosion of transparent political processes and could potentially bolster candidates with authoritarian tendencies. From a left-leaning perspective that is critical of corporate interference in politics, these actions are seen as directly contributing to the rise of populist authoritarianism.

Political contributions

The report outlines ExxonMobil’s active engagement in lobbying and public policy, which, despite representing diverse stakeholder interests, primarily serves to advance fossil fuel agendas. From an anti-fascist perspective, this strategic political involvement may contribute to hindering robust environmental and social justice reforms, thereby indirectly supporting authoritarian industry practices. The relatively low reported spend could mask deeper influence, warranting a negative rating in political contributions and lobbying efforts.

Advocacy: Policy & Lobbying Priorities

ExxonMobil's substantial political contributions in 2023, totaling over half a million dollars, reflect a corporate strategy that leverages financial power to influence political outcomes. This practice, while legally compliant, is viewed negatively from an anti-fascist perspective as it potentially facilitates corporate control over political processes and supports the entrenchment of authoritarian-friendly policies.

Political contributions

By subjecting its political contributions to annual board review and internal audits, ExxonMobil demonstrates a commitment to transparency in its political spending. While such measures can help mitigate the risk of funds being channeled to authoritarian or far‐right causes, the overall impact on its political influence remains subject to broader scrutiny.

2023 corporate political contributions

ExxonMobil’s 2023 political contributions, amounting to significant sums at both national and state levels, reflect a corporate engagement strategy that prioritizes corporate interests over grassroots democratic participation. This activity, while legally compliant, can be seen through an anti-fascist lens as furthering corporate influence in political processes, potentially diluting broader progressive reforms.

Political contributions

The legal penalty imposed on ExxonMobil in connection with a human rights abuse lawsuit in Aceh, Indonesia highlights potential failings in upholding labor and human rights practices. Although the company denies awareness of violations, the court ruling underscores a troubling pattern of neglect regarding human rights, which aligns with broader concerns about corporate complicity in abuses.

Human rights abuses: How complicit are oil companies?

Exxon Mobil has actively lobbied against parts of a major Democratic budget bill by spending significant sums on targeted Facebook ads. This effort to oppose tax hikes, which are designed to aid working-class families and fund climate initiatives, reflects a prioritization of corporate profit over public welfare. Such actions contribute to the broader pattern of corporate complicity in undermining democratic fiscal policies and progressive reforms, which may indirectly support authoritarian practices.

Exxon Mobil has been lobbying against parts of Biden reconciliation bill

ExxonMobil's use of a lockout during a critical period of contract negotiations, combined with efforts that implicitly supported union decertification, reflects a disregard for workers' rights and promotes anti-union practices. This behavior aligns with authoritarian approaches to suppress dissent and weaken labor protections.

11/25/2024: ExxonMobil's Lockout of Workers During Decertification Push Was Legal

ExxonMobil's decision to lock out workers and engage in anti-union decertification efforts, while legally defensible, reflects a concerning disregard for fair labor practices. The company's communication encouraging employees to vote against the union, along with the use of economic pressure during contract negotiations, undermines collective worker rights and is viewed very negatively from an anti-fascist and labor rights perspective.

11/25/2024: ExxonMobil's Lockout of Workers During Decertification Push Was Legal

ExxonMobil's prolonged lockout of unionized workers at the Beaumont refinery and its aggressive anti-union measures—such as pressuring workers to decertify their union—reflect a pattern of undermining labor rights. This event illustrates how corporate practices can contribute to broader authoritarian economic and social structures, directly impacting the bargaining power and rights of workers.

Inside Exxon's 10-Month Lockout of Beaumont Refinery Workers

ExxonMobil's decision to lock out a large number of workers during a union decertification campaign illustrates an aggressive labor practice that undermines worker rights. Despite the judge finding the overall lockout legally motivated during bargaining, the unilateral discontinuation of safety meetings and coercive communications against union support indicate problematic labor relations and anti-worker practices.

11/25/2024: ExxonMobil's Lockout of Workers During Decertification Push Was Legal

ExxonMobil’s decision to reject union-proposed health and safety language undermines essential labor rights and worker safety. By refusing to implement measures designed to prevent fatigue and ensure safer working conditions, the company demonstrates a prioritization of corporate control over employee well-being, which can be interpreted as neglecting its ethical responsibilities.

ExxonMobil Refuses to Agree to Health and Safety Language during Talks for New Contract at Baytown Complex

ExxonMobil’s historical financial contributions to The Heritage Foundation have indirectly supported Project 2025’s agenda, which includes proposals that could undermine civil rights and environmental protections. These actions provide critical backing for far-right policies and contribute to an environment where authoritarian measures can take shape.

Project 2025's Heritage Foundation Donors Have Included Coors, Walmart and ExxonMobil?

The lawsuit outlines accusations that ExxonMobil was complicit in severe human rights abuses, including torture, sexual assault, and beatings of villagers near its Indonesian facility. These allegations point to a blatant disregard for labor rights and human dignity, reflecting poorly on its ethical business practices.

Exxon in human rights trouble