Company Directory - Google Fiber
Company Details - Google Fiber
Google Fiber
WebsiteMountain View, United States
Google Fiber is an Alphabet company that provides high-speed broadband internet and television services in select U.S. cities. Known for its pioneering ultra-fast internet speeds, it aims to enhance digital connectivity and transform the way residents experience online media and communication.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Google Fiber
-36.22
0.02%
Latest Event
Alphabet Inc Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
OpenSecrets data reveals that Alphabet Inc, parent of Google Fiber, contributed over $20 million and spent nearly $15 million on lobbying in the 2024 election cycle. This significant involvement in political spending raises concerns about corporate influence on democratic processes and potential complicity in supporting authoritarian practices.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Google Fiber is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- FEB062025
OpenSecrets data reveals that Alphabet Inc, parent of Google Fiber, contributed over $20 million and spent nearly $15 million on lobbying in the 2024 election cycle. This significant involvement in political spending raises concerns about corporate influence on democratic processes and potential complicity in supporting authoritarian practices.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
The released figures from OpenSecrets indicate that Alphabet Inc, which Google Fiber is part of, engaged in substantial political contributions and lobbying. Spending over $14 million on lobbying and donating over $20 million in the 2024 cycle demonstrates a concerning level of political influence that can undermine democratic accountability and facilitate authoritarian tendencies.
- FEB012025
Google's GAPP transparency page details its corporate political contributions and lobbying practices, including the use of a dedicated political action committee (NetPAC) and strict adherence to regulatory guidelines. While the company emphasizes transparency and compliance, its extensive engagement in political funding and lobbying is seen as contributing to corporate influence over democratic processes, which anti-fascist perspectives view as a complicity factor in undermining genuine democratic accountability.
-20
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
The transparency report reveals that Google systematically discloses its corporate political contributions and lobbying activities, including the operations of its NetPAC. Despite meeting rigorous compliance and transparency standards, these practices nonetheless amplify corporate influence in the political arena. From a left-leaning anti-fascist perspective, such entrenched corporate participation in political funding can indirectly bolster power structures that override grassroots democratic accountability, thus contributing negatively to the broader fight against authoritarian tendencies.
- JAN302025
A scholarly work on digital authoritarianism highlights that dominant tech companies, including those providing critical digital infrastructure like Google Fiber, play a role in enabling algorithmic despotism. The discussion raises concerns about how such companies might contribute to an environment that facilitates state and corporate overreach in digital spaces.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
The article frames the discussion of digital authoritarianism in the context of powerful tech companies that can adopt practices undermining democratic values. While Google Fiber is primarily an infrastructure provider, its role as part of a dominant tech ecosystem suggests a potential complicity in enabling state and corporate surveillance and control. This negative score reflects concerns about public and political behavior in the digital age.
Digital Authoritarianism: from state control to algorithmic despotism
-40
Technology and Services Impact
March 26
The text emphasizes that advanced technologies can be leveraged for both liberation and authoritarian control. Google Fiber, as a provider of digital infrastructure, is implicated in the broader ecosystem that may enable mass surveillance and algorithmic despotism. This rating reflects serious concerns regarding the technology and services impact of companies operating in this domain.
Digital Authoritarianism: from state control to algorithmic despotism
- JAN102025
The NLRB has filed a complaint alleging that Google, as part of Alphabet, is acting as a joint employer by exerting too much control over contract workers, potentially reducing their rights to collectively bargain. This comes amid broader concerns over Google’s labor practices and adjustments aimed at limiting union influence.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The joint employer complaint highlights troubling labor practices at Google, where contract workers are being deprived of fair bargaining rights. This approach, which includes reducing minimum wage guarantees and limiting union engagement, aligns with broader corporate efforts that can be seen as complicit in undermining worker protections—an issue of particular concern in the current political climate focused on resisting authoritarian practices.
Google owner Alphabet faces fresh joint employer complaint over contract workers
- JAN072025
The US National Labor Relations Board has filed a fresh complaint alleging that Google acts as a joint employer for about 50 contract workers, including San Francisco-based content creators hired via IT contractor Accenture Flex, raising concerns over its union bargaining practices and treatment of contract labor.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The complaint by the NLRB highlights potential labor rights abuses, with Google being accused of acting as a 'joint employer' for contract workers. This raises significant concerns regarding the company’s commitment to fair labor practices and respect for unionization efforts. Such behavior can be interpreted as complicit with broader practices that undermine workers' rights and facilitate an environment conducive to authoritarian labor practices.
Google faces new labor board complaint over contractor union bargaining
- OCT242024
The article details how Google’s secret projects—such as the DragonFly censored search engine for China and its engagement with the Cuban government—highlight troubling compromises with authoritarian regimes, raising questions about the company’s commitment to free expression and ethical business practices.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
Google’s covert efforts to develop a censored search engine for China and its secretive engagements with repressive regimes undermine democratic values and demonstrate a disturbing alignment with authoritarian practices. This behavior significantly impacts public trust in the company’s political stance.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
The willingness to compromise on core ethical values—demonstrated by engaging in secret projects that adhere to oppressive censorship and collaborating with authoritarian regimes—raises serious concerns about Google’s business practices and ethical responsibility.
-70
Technology and Services Impact
March 26
Developing technology designed for censorship, exemplified by the DragonFly project, represents a direct negative impact on the free flow of information. This technological service not only undermines transparency but also facilitates state control and surveillance.
-40
Economic and Structural Influence
March 26
By aligning its economic interests with repressive regimes in markets like China and Cuba, Google demonstrates a willingness to compromise structural integrity for profit. This economic collaboration with authoritarian states undermines democratic market principles.
- AUG152024Google directive to silence worker speech amid antitrust litigation raises labor rights concerns
-70.10
Google's management directive asking workers to refrain from discussing their antitrust case has drawn criticism from the Alphabet Workers Union, who claim it represents a clear violation of labor rights and a suppression of free speech in the workplace.
-75
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The article documents that Google management issued directives to limit employee discussions about an ongoing antitrust litigation, which critics argue undermines workers' rights to freely discuss labor conditions and participate in collective actions. This has been viewed as a suppressive measure that fits into a broader pattern of poor labor practices and could contribute to an environment that stifles dissent and union activities.
- DEC192023
Google’s unprecedented $1.5 million spending on lobbying efforts in California, including funding political ads through a taxpayer advocacy group, aimed at stalling legislation that would require tech companies to compensate news publishers. This aggressive political influence raises concerns about corporate interference in democratic processes and contributes to a power imbalance favoring corporate interests over public welfare.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
Google’s record spending of $1.5 million on lobbying in California, particularly through funding politically charged ads against legislation intended to support local news and transparency, exemplifies corporate overreach in influencing public policy. This aggressive use of financial power undermines democratic accountability by prioritizing corporate interests over the public good and is indicative of a troubling trend of using lobbying as a means to stall progressive reforms.
- NOV082022
Alphabet-affiliated donations, including those from Google Fiber, allocated around 80% to Democratic candidates during the 2022 election cycle, demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic governance and resisting authoritarian practices.
+70
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
Alphabet's pattern of political donations shows that approximately 80% of contributions are directed towards Democratic candidates. This allocation is viewed positively from an anti-authoritarian perspective as it supports democratic governance over authoritarian policies. While corporate political contributions can be complex, directing funds predominantly towards progressive organizations is a constructive move against the rise of fascism and authoritarianism.
- DEC112019
In December 2019, an investigation by the NLRB was launched following allegations that Google dismissed employees involved in union organizing and violated labor rights. The incident, which follows a prior settlement regarding free speech and union-related issues, raises serious concerns about the company’s commitment to ethical labor practices and respect for workers' rights.
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 26
The investigation highlights alleged unfair labor practices and anti-union measures, suggesting a failure to uphold basic worker rights and ethical labor standards. The dismissal of employees involved in organizing and the broader pattern of suppressing dissent indicate corporate behavior that indirectly supports authoritarian management practices.
Google Under Investigation For Alleged Unfair Labor Practices - Forbes
- DEC312014
OpenSecrets reports that Google Inc spent $16.83 million on lobbying in 2014, raising concerns about its use of corporate financial power to influence government policy. As Google Fiber is part of the Alphabet umbrella, these actions risk contributing to an environment where corporate interests may undermine democratic processes.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
The reported lobbying expenditure of $16.83 million in 2014 points to a significant effort to influence government decisions in favor of corporate interests. From an anti-fascist perspective, such high spending on lobbying can be seen as an enabler for authoritarian practices, potentially undermining democratic norms and transparency. This raises concerns about corporate complicity in a power structure that may prioritize profit and influence over public good.
Alternatives
Corporation
-45.81
New York City, United States
-16.45
Dublin, Ireland
64.20
Corporation
-49.16
Detroit, United States
68.48
Schaumburg, United States
31.22
United States
3.96
Monroe, United States
0.00
Dallas, United States
-16.65
Norwalk, United States
-27.34
Industries
- 517312
- Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite)
- 517110
- Wired Telecommunications Carriers
- 517910
- Other Telecommunications
- 517211
- Broadband Internet Service Providers (ISPs)