Company Directory - Energy Transfer
CCI Score
CCI Score: Energy Transfer
-45.28
0.19%
Latest Event
Energy Transfer Driver Petition to Remove Union Representation
Drivers at Energy Transfer in Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana have petitioned the NLRB to hold a vote to decertify the United Steelworkers union, which would remove union representation for over 420 drivers. The petition, submitted by driver Jay Fifer with support from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, highlights a growing trend of anti-union sentiment in the company’s operations.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
QUISLING
Energy Transfer is currently rated as a Quisling.
Latest Events
APR212025Drivers at Energy Transfer in Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana have petitioned the NLRB to hold a vote to decertify the United Steelworkers union, which would remove union representation for over 420 drivers. The petition, submitted by driver Jay Fifer with support from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, highlights a growing trend of anti-union sentiment in the company’s operations.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
May 8
The move to decertify the union undermines collective bargaining rights and worker protections, which runs counter to principles that support labor empowerment and equitable treatment. The anti-union petition aligns with right-to-work ideologies that weaken worker solidarity and protections, reflecting negatively on the company’s labor relations practices.
Energy Transfer drivers in Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana seek to remove Steelworkers union
- FEB242025
Energy Transfer has filed a lawsuit against Greenpeace, alleging defamation and disruption during protests related to the Dakota Access Pipeline construction. The company claims that Greenpeace's actions have caused financial and physical harm, framing the protest actions as unlawful though it asserts support for free speech when conducted lawfully.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
May 8
The lawsuit filed by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace appears to leverage legal action to counter environmental protest, which can be seen as a tactic to intimidate dissent and suppress activism. This approach aligns with authoritarian corporate behavior by using litigation to potentially stifle legitimate protest and free speech, raising concerns under the 'Public and Political Behavior' category.
Dallas-based Energy Transfer's lawsuit against Greenpeace goes to trial
- FEB242025
Energy Transfer has initiated a $300 million lawsuit against Greenpeace, alleging defamation and inciting protests related to pipeline construction claims. The lawsuit is viewed by critics as a strategic move to suppress independent and Indigenous-led activism, with the company's leadership and political contributions further drawing scrutiny for aligning with far-right priorities.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
May 8
Energy Transfer's decision to sue Greenpeace is seen as an attempt to silence environmental and Indigenous-led protest movements. This action, combined with its significant political donations to far-right candidates, reflects public and political behavior that aligns with authoritarian tactics and undermines democratic engagement.
Dallas-based Energy Transfer's $300 million trial against Greenpeace begins today
-30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
May 8
The lawsuit represents a use of litigation to deter public participation and dissent, which raises concerns about ethical business practices. Energy Transfer's aggressive legal action against environmental critics is viewed as prioritizing corporate interests over public accountability and community rights.
Dallas-based Energy Transfer's $300 million trial against Greenpeace begins today
- FEB112025
Energy Transfer has engaged in a series of SLAPP lawsuits, including a pending US$300 million suit against Greenpeace International, aimed at intimidating activists and suppressing dissent following protests related to its Dakota Access Pipeline. The repeated litigation strategy exemplifies the use of legal intimidation to deter public participation.
-80
Public and Political Behavior
May 8
Energy Transfer’s strategic use of SLAPP lawsuits to silence environmental and indigenous critics undermines free speech and public participation. Such tactics are characteristic of authoritarian practices that seek to consolidate corporate power and deter civic engagement.
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
May 8
The persistent filing of meritless and aggressive lawsuits by Energy Transfer, including a US$300 million suit against environmental nonprofits, reflects unethical business practices. This approach not only burdens civil society with excessive legal costs but also reinforces corporate attempts to silence dissent, aligning with authoritarian corporate strategies.
- DEC222023
Energy Transfer is accused of engaging in anti-competitive behavior by denying three projects to cross its pipelines in Louisiana, a move that could consolidate its market control and impact over $2 billion in energy infrastructure. The dispute, which has led to a lawsuit alleging blatant monopoly abuse, raises concerns over fair market competition and the concentration of economic power.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
May 8
The allegations that Energy Transfer is denying pipeline crossings to impede competitors highlight questionable business practices. Such anti-competitive behavior risks creating a de facto monopoly, which centralizes power and can undermine democratic market principles, aligning with authoritarian economic tactics.
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
May 8
By allegedly obstructing projects that would otherwise challenge its market dominance, Energy Transfer is contributing to the concentration of economic power. This consolidation can diminish competitive pressures and pave the way for authoritarian control in the energy sector.
- AUG012017
A Greenpeace USA report alleges that Energy Transfer Partners lobbied for anti‐protest legislation intended to criminalize dissent, employed private security firms to surveil and intimidate protestors, and engaged in strategic litigation (SLAPP lawsuits) against critics. The report details instances including a high-profile lawsuit in August 2017 and other aggressive actions that undermine human rights and freedom of speech.
-80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
May 8
Energy Transfer Partners actively lobbied for legislation that restricts protest rights—a move that aligns with authoritarian suppression of dissent. The aggressive lobbying efforts, including associations with groups like ALEC that push corporate interests over public freedoms, heavily weigh against democratic norms.
Greenpeace USA report shows pipeline company behind new anti-protest legislation in the US
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
May 8
The reported actions also include the use of strategic lawsuits and deployment of private security to intimidate critics, contributing to broader human rights abuses. These measures undermine freedom of speech and the right to protest, reflecting poor ethical responsibility and harmful business practices.
Greenpeace USA report shows pipeline company behind new anti-protest legislation in the US
Alternatives
Calgary, Canada
-22.74
Tulsa, United States
41.29
Corporation
-24.05
Calgary, Canada
-15.76
Calgary, Canada
-21.24
Moscow, Russia
-51.08
Dallas, USA
-60.93
Corporation
-3.06
Houston, United States
-11.31
Canada
18.93
Corporate Financials
- Revenue
- 2024
- $22.00B
- Total Assets
- 2024
- $75.00B
- Operating Income
- 2024
- $5.00B
- Total Equity
- 2024
- $30.00B
Employees: 11,000
Industries
- 213112
- Support Activities for Oil and Gas Operations
- 221210
- Natural Gas Distribution
- 486110
- Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil
- 486210
- Pipeline Transportation of Natural Gas
- 486190
- Other Pipeline Transportation