Company Directory - Autoscience
Company Details - Autoscience
Autoscience
WebsiteAutoscience creates innovative AI research tools that facilitate scientific research and analysis across various fields, making it easier for researchers to derive insights and conduct experiments using cutting-edge technology.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Autoscience
-52.89
0.03%
Latest Event
Autoscience's Controversial AI Study Submission
On March 19, 2025, Autoscience was reported to have submitted AI‐generated studies to the ICLR conference without informing reviewers, ostensibly to gain publicity. This move has drawn criticism for undermining the integrity of the peer review process and potentially exploiting unpaid academic labor.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
QUISLING
Autoscience is currently rated as a Quisling.
Latest Events
- MAR192025
On March 19, 2025, Autoscience was reported to have submitted AI‐generated studies to the ICLR conference without informing reviewers, ostensibly to gain publicity. This move has drawn criticism for undermining the integrity of the peer review process and potentially exploiting unpaid academic labor.
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 12
Autoscience's decision to submit AI‐generated research without disclosing the underlying process breaches ethical business practices. By prioritizing publicity over transparency, the company risks eroding academic standards and exploiting the unpaid labor of peer reviewers, which are central concerns from an anti-fascist, worker-rights perspective.
- MAR192025
Autoscience submitted AI-generated studies to ICLR without notifying organizers or obtaining consent, leading to accusations that the company exploited the voluntary peer review process for publicity purposes and imposed unpaid labor on academic reviewers.
-50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 12
By submitting AI-generated studies without obtaining proper consent from ICLR leaders and reviewers, Autoscience undermined the integrity of the peer review process. This act is seen as exploiting unpaid academic labor, which aligns with violations in labor relations and ethical business practices. Such conduct promotes unethical use of technology and disregards the fair treatment of individuals contributing free labor, thereby contributing to broader concerns about corporate complicity in unethical practices.
- MAR192025
Autoscience was criticized for submitting AI‐generated papers to ICLR workshops without obtaining consent from volunteer peer reviewers, effectively exploiting the peer review system for self‐promotion and undermining the unpaid labor of academic evaluators.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 12
The article details that Autoscience submitted AI-generated studies without securing consent from reviewers, thereby devaluing the intensive, voluntary work performed by academic peer reviewers. This unethical business practice prioritizes self-promotion over respect for the established norms of academic evaluation, showcasing a disregard for ethical responsibility in business practices.
Researchers Claim AI Startups are Exploiting Peer Review for Self-Promotion
Alternatives
Wichita, United States
62.86
United Kingdom
-1.52
Corporation
75.20
Corporation
-13.71
Corporation
-25.86
Mountain View, United States
-10.32
Falls Church, United States
-11.68
Aurora, Canada
-13.92
Bethesda, United States
-17.90
Corporation
54.47
Industries
- 541330
- Engineering Services
- 541715
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
- 336111
- Automobile Manufacturing