Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - American Center for Law and Justice

Company Details - American Center for Law and Justice

American Center for Law and Justice Logo

American Center for Law and Justice

Website

A legal and educational organization dedicated to the defense of constitutional freedoms and rights.

CCI Score

CCI Score: American Center for Law and Justice

5.83

-0.01%

Latest Event

ACLJ Supports Trump's Efforts to Dismantle DEI

The American Center for Law and Justice filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, supporting Trump Administration executive orders aimed at ending federal programs focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The brief argues that such DEI efforts constitute unconstitutional race-based discrimination, aligning with the administration's efforts to dismantle what it sees as illegal discrimination programs.

Take Action

So what can you do? Support ACLJ by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.

Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL
Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

OBJECTOR

American Center for Law and Justice is currently rated as an Objector.

0 to +9 CCI Score
These companies deliberately avoid direct involvement with authoritarian practices. While they do not actively challenge oppressive regimes, they maintain a neutral stance to ensure they are not complicit in supporting such systems.

Latest Events

  • ACLJ Supports Trump's Efforts to Dismantle DEI Logo
    MAR
    15
    2025

    The American Center for Law and Justice filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, supporting Trump Administration executive orders aimed at ending federal programs focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The brief argues that such DEI efforts constitute unconstitutional race-based discrimination, aligning with the administration's efforts to dismantle what it sees as illegal discrimination programs.

  • -75

    Executive Political Engagement

    April 2

    By filing an amicus brief supporting the Trump Administration's executive orders, ACLJ is actively engaging in political efforts to dismantle DEI programs. This action undermines efforts to protect marginalized communities and equal opportunity initiatives, aligning with an agenda that can promote authoritarian policies by eliminating safeguards against racial discrimination.

    Dismantling DEI: ACLJ Files Amicus Brief in Federal Appeals Court To Support Trump’s Executive Orders To End Racial Discrimination in Federal Programs

  • ACLJ Defends Trump’s Authority via Amicus Briefs Logo
    FEB
    13
    2025

    The ACLJ filed three amicus briefs on February 13, 2025, in federal courts across the country defending President Trump's executive authority to govern and spend federal funds according to his conservative agenda. An update on February 14, 2025, noted the filing of an additional brief in D.C., reinforcing their active support for a concentrated executive power.

  • -70

    Executive Political Engagement

    April 2

    By filing amicus briefs to defend President Trump’s authority, ACLJ is actively supporting an agenda that consolidates executive power and undermines the separation of powers, key drivers in authoritarian practices. This legal intervention not only backs a concentrated political authority but also paves the way for policies that may erode democratic norms, thereby aligning with authoritarian and fascist tendencies.

    ACLJ Files Three Amicus Briefs Across the Country in One Day Defending President Trump's Authority

  • ACLJ Challenges Dismissal in Lawsuit Over Government-Sponsored Abortion Campaign Logo
    NOV
    13
    2024

    ACLJ filed opposition to a motion to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that Massachusetts officials and a pro‐abortion group engaged in a viewpoint-based discrimination campaign against a pro-life pregnancy center. The lawsuit contends that the state’s actions, including selective law enforcement and a targeted propaganda campaign, suppress free speech rights.

  • +40

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 2

    ACLJ’s legal action challenges an alleged government-sponsored campaign that targets a pro-life center by suppressing its free speech. By opposing the motion to dismiss on grounds of viewpoint discrimination, ACLJ positions itself against authoritarian tactics favoring censorship and selective enforcement, which aligns with anti‐authoritarian, democratic values.

    Pro-Abortion Defendants Try To Have Pro-Life Center's Lawsuit Thrown Out – ACLJ Fires Back

  • ACLJ Files Amicus Brief on Religious Liberty in Workplace Logo
    OCT
    01
    2023

    The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the Groff v. DeJoy case, arguing for the overruling of the Hardison precedent to fully protect employee religious accommodations.

  • +80

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 2

    By filing an amicus brief to challenge the longstanding Hardison precedent, ACLJ is actively advocating for enhanced protections of religious accommodations in the workplace, thereby supporting worker rights and challenging norms that undermine fair practices. This proactive stance aligns with progressive values by promoting inclusion and resistance to policies that could facilitate authoritarian labor practices.

    ACLJ Urges U.S. Supreme Court To Hear Key Case Involving Religious Liberty Rights in the Workplace

  • ACLJ Appeals to UN on Human Rights for Pakistani Christians Logo
    APR
    20
    2023

    ACLJ, via its European affiliate ECLJ, called on the UN Human Rights Council to take action against Pakistan’s oppressive blasphemy laws and the persecution of minority Christians, urging international accountability for human rights abuses.

  • +70

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 2

    ACLJ’s public appeal to the UN Human Rights Council highlights proactive engagement in countering authoritarian practices and human rights abuses abroad. By calling for international action against Pakistan’s discriminatory blasphemy laws—which enable persecution of minority Christians—ACLJ demonstrates alignment with anti-authoritarian and human rights-oriented values.

    ACLJ Calls on UN Human Rights Council to Take Action after Christians Sentenced to Death in Pakistan

  • ACLJ Challenges FBI Over Targeting of Christians Logo
    JAN
    23
    2023

    On January 23, 2023, ACLJ initiated a legal challenge by filing a FOIA request in response to an FBI memo that linked Traditionalist Catholics with extremist ideologies. The memo, which conflated conservative religious practices with white nationalist tendencies, prompted ACLJ to demand clarity and accountability from the agency.

  • +80

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 2

    ACLJ’s decision to file a FOIA request against the FBI’s memo exemplifies strong public and political engagement. By challenging a government agency that appears to use biased language in its profiling, ACLJ defends constitutional freedoms and resists authoritarian overreach. This action supports transparency and accountability in governmental practices, aligning with anti-fascist principles.

    FBI Targeting Christians

  • ACLJ Charitable Funds Routed to Trump Defense Entities Logo
    JAN
    30
    2020

    An AP investigation revealed that the American Center for Law and Justice funneled nearly $37 million in charitable funds to the CLA Group, a for‐profit law firm linked to Trump’s defense team. The report highlights concerns over blurred lines between nonprofit activities and for‐profit interests, with funds funneled to entities controlled by Jay Sekulow and his family, raising questions about ethical management and potential partisan misuse.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 2

    The investigation details how ACLJ, a tax-exempt nonprofit barred from partisan political activities, has indirectly supported Trump’s legal defense by channeling funds to for-profit entities associated with its leadership. This entanglement with politically charged legal efforts undermines the organization’s integrity and supports authoritarian-aligned legal strategies.

    Trump lawyer blurs lines between charity and profit

  • -80

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 2

    The reported financial maneuvers at ACLJ, including extensive payments to for-profit companies controlled by its leadership and family members, indicate questionable business practices. The blending of nonprofit resources with personal financial gain and politically motivated defense efforts demonstrates a significant breach of ethical responsibility.

    Trump lawyer blurs lines between charity and profit

Industries

541110
Offices of Lawyers
541199
All Other Legal Services
813920
Professional Organizations