Company Directory - U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Company Details - U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
WebsiteWashington, D.C., United States
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is a federal agency responsible for enforcing securities laws to protect investors and maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets.
CCI Score
CCI Score: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
-3.58
0.01%
Latest Event
Bill Mandates SEC Supply Chain Due Diligence Reporting
A bill introduced in the 119th Congress proposes that the SEC require companies to report on their sourcing and due diligence activities related to products linked to forced labor in Xinjiang, China. This measure aims to enhance transparency and accountability in supply chains.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
BYSTANDER
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is currently rated as a Bystander.
Latest Events
- APR082025
A bill introduced in the 119th Congress proposes that the SEC require companies to report on their sourcing and due diligence activities related to products linked to forced labor in Xinjiang, China. This measure aims to enhance transparency and accountability in supply chains.
+60
Supply Chain Ethics
April 9
The proposed bill directs the SEC to enforce enhanced reporting on due diligence activities in supply chains, specifically targeting products linked to forced labor in Xinjiang. Such oversight promotes ethical sourcing and accountability, aligning with anti-authoritarian and human rights standards by preventing complicity in exploitative practices.
- APR042025
A bill, S. 1358, introduced in Congress on April 4, 2025, would require the SEC to enforce reporting among companies on their sourcing and due diligence activities for supply chains linked to forced labor in Xinjiang, China. This legislative move aims to improve transparency and accountability in supply chains tied to unethical labor practices.
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
April 9
The proposed bill directs the SEC to mandate enhanced reporting on supply chain sourcing and due diligence, particularly targeting imports linked to forced labor in Xinjiang. By promoting transparency and accountability in supply chains, this action supports progressive labor rights and combats exploitation, aligning with anti-fascist and anti-authoritarian principles.
- MAR252025
The SEC's agreement to retain $50 million of the Ripple fine while refunding the remaining penalty marks the end of a prolonged legal battle. Critics argue this compromise may signal regulatory leniency towards corporate malfeasance and undermine robust investor protection.
- MAR142025
The SEC issued new guidance that permits companies to exclude shareholder proposals related to lobbying transparency while simultaneously approving energy finance proposals that require major banks to disclose their energy supply ratios. This mixed ruling has raised concerns among critics that the SEC is favoring corporate interests and enabling regulatory capture, even as it advances transparency in sustainable finance.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 25
The SEC's decision to allow companies to exclude proposals scrutinizing their lobbying practices undermines public accountability and democratic oversight. This guidance, by sidelining proposals that could hold companies accountable for political influence, is interpreted as favoring corporate interests—a move that emboldens authoritarian tendencies in the political realm.
+30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 25
The SEC’s approval of energy finance proposals, which mandate that banks disclose the proportion of finance allocated to low-carbon versus high-carbon energy initiatives, is a positive step towards enhancing transparency and accountability in sustainable finance. This measure supports efforts to shift financial practices in favor of environmental and social responsibility.
-20
Economic and Structural Influence
March 25
By permitting companies to bypass shareholder proposals on political lobbying, the SEC's guidance raises concerns about regulatory capture. This decision potentially diminishes independent oversight and enables corporate influence in policymaking, which can contribute to an environment conducive to authoritarian practices.
- MAR142025
The SEC approved rulings that allow major corporations to exclude shareholder proposals related to lobbying, raising concerns over diminished corporate transparency and increased influence of corporate interests aligned with a deregulatory, authoritarian agenda.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 25
The SEC’s decision to permit companies to exclude shareholder proposals concerning lobbying activities undermines democratic oversight and transparency. By favoring corporate interests over robust public engagement, this action aligns with deregulatory trends observed under the Trump administration and potentially facilitates authoritarian corporate influence.
SEC issues rulings on lobbying and energy finance proposals by Minerva-Manifest
-15
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 25
Allowing companies the flexibility to bypass proposals on political lobbying and energy finance disclosures compromises ethical business practices and accountability. This regulatory decision weakens corporate governance measures that protect against systemic corporate collusion with authoritarian agendas.
SEC issues rulings on lobbying and energy finance proposals by Minerva-Manifest
- MAR082025
The SEC approved a decision allowing companies to block shareholder proposals on lobbying activities, a move that undermines transparency and accountability in corporate political conduct. This decision raises concerns over enhanced corporate influence and potential regulatory capture, thereby facilitating an environment where corporate complicity in authoritarian practices might flourish.
-75
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 25
The SEC's decision to allow companies to exclude shareholder proposals related to lobbying activities diminishes oversight over corporate political contributions. By reducing shareholder influence on corporate lobbying practices, the move implicitly supports an environment where corporate interests can evade critical accountability measures, raising the risk of bolstering authoritarian alignments.
-40
Regulatory Capture
March 25
Allowing companies to opt out of discussing lobbying through shareholder proposals can be interpreted as a form of regulatory capture. This decision potentially limits external scrutiny and empowers corporate interests over public welfare, undermining transparency and effective checks on corporate behavior.
- FEB112025
Under pressure from the Trump administration, the SEC halted several progressive rulemaking initiatives—including ESG disclosures, climate-related rules, and board diversity requirements—to refocus its efforts on deregulation and capital-raising measures.
-65
Executive Political Engagement
April 9
The SEC’s leadership has followed executive directives by stalling progressive regulatory initiatives, such as ESG and diversity rules, in alignment with the Trump administration’s authoritarian agenda. This move reduces protections for investors and marginalized communities, reflecting negative executive political engagement.
The Changing Tides of the SEC Under the Second Trump Administration
-40
Regulatory Capture
April 9
By halting expansive rulemaking and suspending enforcement of progressive measures, the SEC is effectively succumbing to regulatory capture. This rollback benefits deregulated capital formation, undermining investor protections and the promotion of equitable market practices, aligning with authoritarian economic interests.
The Changing Tides of the SEC Under the Second Trump Administration
- JAN202025
Anticipated leadership changes and regulatory rollbacks at the SEC under the Trump administration could undermine progressive regulatory initiatives such as climate disclosure rules and stringent digital asset enforcement. With Chairman Gary Gensler expected to step down and a politically appointed interim leadership set to take charge, the agency is likely to align its policies with partisan directives, raising concerns about independent oversight and potential regulatory capture.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 9
The anticipated replacement of a progressive leadership under Gensler with a Trump-appointed interim chair signals a move towards politicization of the SEC. This shift in executive political engagement undermines the agency’s traditional independence and may serve to advance authoritarian policy directions, compromising investor and public protections.
-50
Regulatory Capture
April 9
The expected shift in regulatory approach—including potential rollbacks of key rules on climate disclosures and digital asset oversight—raises significant concerns about regulatory capture. This action suggests a compromise of the SEC's mandate in favor of partisan, authoritarian directives, thereby weakening protections for investors and the public.
- JAN012025
A ScienceDirect article discusses theoretical models suggesting that the SEC may be subject to political influence through wealth transfers in exchange for political support, potentially undermining its impartial enforcement role.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 25
The article references academic models (Stigler 1971, Pelzman 1976, Grossman and Helpman 1994) that portray regulatory agencies like the SEC as vulnerable to political influence through financial transfers and vote trading. This exchange can skew regulatory enforcement and erode public trust, thereby contributing to the rise of authoritarian practices.
- NOV292023
The SEC's use of administrative law judges in its enforcement action against hedge fund manager George Jarkesy is now under scrutiny as a Supreme Court hearing on November 29 may reshape the legal landscape. The case raises concerns about the potential undermining of institutional safeguards that prevent authoritarian influences, as critics argue that overturning this practice could pave the way for partisan interference in federal civil service protections.
+40
Public and Political Behavior
April 9
The SEC's enforcement action upholds a critical democratic function by using administrative law judges to impartially adjudicate securities fraud, thereby resisting political interference and authoritarian influence. The potential challenge from unitary executive theory underscores the importance of this regulatory safeguard.
A Supreme Court case about stocks could help make Trump’s authoritarian dreams reality
+30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 9
The SEC's decision to enforce penalties against fraudulent practices reinforces ethical business conduct in the financial markets. By holding violators accountable, the agency protects investors and maintains the integrity of market operations, a key function in upholding fairness and transparency.
A Supreme Court case about stocks could help make Trump’s authoritarian dreams reality
+20
Economic and Structural Influence
April 9
By relying on a structured system of administrative adjudication, the SEC reinforces established regulatory frameworks that prevent arbitrary executive control. This structure provides a bulwark against potential shifts that might facilitate authoritarian maneuvering within the federal government.
A Supreme Court case about stocks could help make Trump’s authoritarian dreams reality
- MAY032023
Bipartisan lawmakers have called on the SEC to investigate allegations that Shein, a Chinese fast fashion retailer, may be using forced labor from China's Uyghur population in its supply chain ahead of its reported IPO. This request highlights concerns about the SEC's role in enforcing ethical labor practices and protecting human rights in the global marketplace.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
March 25
The SEC is under public and bipartisan pressure to proactively investigate allegations of forced labor associated with Shein's supply chain. This request underscores concerns about the SEC's political responsiveness and its commitment to safeguarding human rights within the marketplace, which is a critical aspect of Public and Political Behavior.
Lawmakers Ask the SEC to Investigate Shein Supply Chain Before the IPO
-15
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 25
The call for an investigation into Shein's supply chain practices raises significant concerns about the SEC's enforcement of ethical business practices and labor standards. A failure to rigorously investigate and uphold these standards could indirectly allow companies that engage in exploitative practices to continue operating unchecked, impacting overall business ethics.
Lawmakers Ask the SEC to Investigate Shein Supply Chain Before the IPO
- MAY022023
On May 2, 2023, a bipartisan group of US House representatives urged the SEC to require Chinese fast‐fashion giant Shein to certify that its products are free from forced labor in Xinjiang. The SEC did not respond to requests for comment, reflecting a concerning lack of proactive engagement on a critical human rights issue.
-30
Public and Political Behavior
March 25
Despite strong congressional pressure to enforce measures that would ensure forced labor is not used by companies like Shein, the SEC's failure to engage or respond to these calls demonstrates a regulatory inaction. From a progressive perspective, this inaction undermines efforts to hold businesses accountable for human rights and labor abuses, thus negatively impacting public trust and political accountability.
- JUN012022
A 2022 academic study indicates that, despite examining the impact of political connectedness, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission remains unbiased and free from regulatory capture. This suggests that the SEC upholds robust enforcement actions, which aligns with anti-authoritarian values.
+95
Public and Political Behavior
October 1
The academic study finds that although firms or executives with stronger political connectedness tend to face harsher enforcement, the SEC itself is not subject to capture. This reinforces its role as an impartial regulator, supporting fair markets and resisting authoritarian influences.
Is the SEC captured? Evidence from political connectedness and SEC enforcement actions
+90
Economic and Structural Influence
October 1
Focusing on regulatory capture under Economic and Structural Influence, the study shows that the SEC maintains structural independence and is not influenced by political connections. This lack of capture supports a system of fair enforcement and resists authoritarian practices.
Is the SEC captured? Evidence from political connectedness and SEC enforcement actions
- APR282022
On April 28, 2022, the SEC charged Brazilian mining company Vale with misleading investors about safety issues prior to a dam collapse that resulted in numerous deaths and significant environmental harm. This enforcement action, emerging shortly after the creation of an ESG Task Force within its Division of Enforcement, signals a broadened regulatory focus that integrates human rights and environmental accountability into corporate oversight.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
April 9
The SEC's proactive enforcement against Vale highlights strong public and political behavior, showcasing its commitment to hold corporations accountable for actions that endanger human lives and the environment. This move is a clear signal of support for marginalized communities harmed by corporate negligence.
The Securities and Exchange Commission as Human Rights Enforcer?
+50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 9
By holding Vale accountable for deceptive practices concerning critical safety and environmental information, the SEC reinforces ethical business practices. This enforcement underscores the importance of corporate responsibility and transparency, aligning with a progressive agenda that protects worker rights and vulnerable communities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission as Human Rights Enforcer?
Alternatives

Tokyo, Japan
-26.20

Charlotte, United States
-24.56
Bala Cynwyd, United States
8.07
Charlotte, United States
-10.22

New York, United States
-12.03

Tel Aviv, Israel
48.57

Corporation
67.05

Corporation
18.66

Corporation
-49.30
New York, United States
25.16
Industries
- 921130
- Public Finance Activities
- 926110
- Administration of General Economic Programs
- 926120
- Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs
- 523110
- Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
- 523120
- Securities Brokerage
- 523920
- Portfolio Management
- 523130
- Commodity Contracts Dealing
- 523140
- Commodity Contracts Brokerage