Company Directory - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Company Details - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
WebsiteWashington, United States
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is an independent agency of the federal government responsible for protecting human health and the environment through the development and enforcement of regulations, research, and public education initiatives.
CCI Score
CCI Score: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
-0.56
0.01%
Latest Event
EPA Announces Review of New Science on Fluoride
The EPA announced it is reviewing new scientific evidence regarding the potential health risks of fluoride in drinking water, following a news conference attended by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and RFK Jr. This review comes amid political pressures and debates over the continued fluoridation of public water systems.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
BYSTANDER
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is currently rated as a Bystander.
Latest Events
- APR082025
The EPA announced it is reviewing new scientific evidence regarding the potential health risks of fluoride in drinking water, following a news conference attended by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and RFK Jr. This review comes amid political pressures and debates over the continued fluoridation of public water systems.
- APR032025
Following an investigation into a death likely linked to carbon monoxide poisoning, the EPA issued safety guidelines advising the public to ventilate spaces and turn off combustion appliances to mitigate poisoning risks.
- MAR272025
Fox News reports that healthcare facilities in Georgia are using EPA-certified cleaners designed to combat the rapidly spreading multi-drug resistant fungus Candida auris in U.S. hospitals. This certification supports public health by ensuring that cleaning agents effectively disinfect hospital environments amid rising infection cases.
- MAR122025
On March 12, 2025, the EPA announced plans to target more than two dozen environmental regulations, including rules aimed at reducing climate pollution and protecting public health. The move is widely viewed as a rollback of critical environmental protections in favor of deregulatory policies that could benefit corporate polluters.
-75
Public and Political Behavior
March 27
The EPA's decision to roll back key environmental regulations represents a significant shift in public and political behavior. This directive undermines long-standing protections against climate pollution and public health hazards, aligning with an authoritarian deregulatory agenda that neglects marginalized communities and the environment.
EPA announces dozens of environmental regulations it plans to target
-60
Economic and Structural Influence
March 27
By attempting to dismantle environmental safeguards, the EPA's actions may pave the way for increased corporate influence and economic exploitation, thereby deepening structural inequalities and undermining accountability. This reflects a concerning trend of economic and structural influence that prioritizes deregulation over public welfare.
EPA announces dozens of environmental regulations it plans to target
- FEB122025
The EPA issued a return-to-office order requiring most teleworking employees, including those under union representation, to resume in-person work by specific deadlines. The move, which overrides existing union agreements and telework arrangements, has sparked legal challenges as unions, notably AFGE, seek to defend contract protections amid directives believed to align with Trump administration priorities.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 3
The EPA’s decision to enforce a return-to-office policy, in alignment with a presidential memorandum, demonstrates a top-down executive approach that undermines the rights of workers and bypasses established collective bargaining agreements. This political directive favors managerial prerogative over democratic labor practices, contributing to an authoritarian work environment.
EPA orders most workers back within weeks, breaking union covenants
-90
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 3
The mandated end to established telework arrangements and union-negotiated contracts severely undermines worker rights and labor protections. The action disregards the legal force of collective bargaining agreements, potentially leading to significant hardship for federal employees and setting a dangerous precedent for undermining union influence.
EPA orders most workers back within weeks, breaking union covenants
- FEB052025
The Trump administration has demoted career EPA officials, replacing them with political appointees who can act without Senate confirmation. This move centralizes control over environmental policy to align with the administration's partisan agenda and has raised concerns about the undermining of the agency's scientific integrity and nonpartisan expertise.
-80
Executive Political Engagement
March 27
Replacing experienced, career EPA officials with politically appointed leaders compromises the agency’s ability to enforce environmental laws based on scientific evidence. This action reflects executive political engagement that undermines nonpartisan expertise and public trust, aligning with authoritarian tendencies that favor political loyalty over informed, impartial governance.
Trump administration shifts EPA leadership to political appointees
- DEC212023
The EPA’s 2023 accomplishments, including the signing of over 50 regulatory rules, deployment of billions in investments from key federal laws, and community outreach across all 10 EPA regions, underscore its commitment to environmental justice and the Biden-Harris Administration’s climate agenda.
+85
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
The EPA’s proactive measures in 2023—ranging from extensive rule-making to direct community engagement—demonstrate strong public and political behavior that advances progressive, anti-authoritarian policies. These actions are aligned with promoting environmental justice and protecting marginalized communities.
+75
Economic and Structural Influence
April 3
By executing significant investments and enacting robust regulatory measures, the EPA enhances its economic and structural influence in favor of sustainable development and social equity. This initiative supports clean energy, job creation in underserved areas, and reinforces the overall progressive governance approach.
- OCT242023
The EPA announced nearly $128 million in grant funding to support 186 environmental justice projects nationwide, aiming to empower historically underinvested communities by improving access to clean air, water, and climate resilience solutions as part of the Biden-Harris Administration’s Investing in America agenda.
+90
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
The EPA's allocation of $128 million for environmental justice projects strongly advances public welfare and addresses historical inequities affecting marginalized communities. This proactive public investment aligns with progressive, anti-authoritarian values by promoting community resilience and equitable access to essential environmental resources.
Biden-Harris Administration Announces Nearly $128 Million for Environmental Justice Projects
+70
Economic and Structural Influence
April 3
The grant funding is designed to catalyze local economic resilience and address structural inequalities by supporting community-led initiatives. By bolstering sustainable infrastructure and reducing the disproportionate burden of environmental harms on marginalized communities, the EPA's action promotes a more equitable economic landscape.
Biden-Harris Administration Announces Nearly $128 Million for Environmental Justice Projects
- JAN012023
OpenSecrets data indicates that in 2023, 1,000 clients lobbied the Environmental Protection Agency, suggesting extensive political pressure and raising concerns about potential regulatory capture that could undermine its mandate to protect public health and the environment.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 27
The reported lobbying activity, involving 1,000 clients in 2023, highlights a significant influx of external influence from corporate and special interest groups. This suggests that the EPA is subject to intense political pressure, which risks regulatory capture and may compromise its mission to safeguard environmental and public health, thereby potentially aligning with authoritarian interests that favor deregulation and corporate benefit over marginalized communities.
Environmental Protection Agency Lobbying Profile • OpenSecrets
- DEC142015
A GAO report from December 2015 concluded that the EPA used appropriated funds to conduct a covert Thunderclap social media campaign and to hyperlink to external websites that explicitly urged the public to contact Congress, thereby violating statutory restrictions on publicity/propaganda and grassroots lobbying during its Waters of the United States rulemaking process.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 3
The EPA’s use of a Thunderclap campaign, in which its authorized message was disseminated via supporters’ social media accounts without clearly revealing the agency’s role, constitutes covert propaganda. This obfuscation undermines transparency and public accountability in political communications, which is a serious violation under the publicity or propaganda prohibition.
Environmental Protection Agency--Application of Publicity or Propaganda and Anti-Lobbying Provisions
-70
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 3
By embedding hyperlinks in its official blog post directing readers to external environmental action pages that actively called for contacting Congress to oppose pending legislation, the EPA engaged in grassroots lobbying. This direct association with lobbying efforts using federal funds violates established appropriations restrictions.
Environmental Protection Agency--Application of Publicity or Propaganda and Anti-Lobbying Provisions
- DEC042012
After intense lobbying from influential Democrat lobbyist Heather Podesta, the EPA reversed its original decision regarding an aquifer exemption for a uranium mining project in Goliad County, Texas. The decision has raised concerns about political interference and regulatory capture overriding sound scientific judgment and public interest.
-70
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 3
The EPA reversed its stance after persistent lobbying by Heather Podesta, indicating that external political pressure from influential lobbyists compromised scientific integrity and public protection, ultimately favoring corporate interests.
After a Powerful Lobbyist Intervenes, EPA Reverses Stance on Polluting Texas County’s Water
-60
Regulatory Capture
April 3
The EPA's decision to compromise on the aquifer exemption, by reducing the required scientific analysis and accepting a smaller but still risky pollution zone, exemplifies regulatory capture where political and economic pressures override rigorous environmental protections.
After a Powerful Lobbyist Intervenes, EPA Reverses Stance on Polluting Texas County’s Water
Alternatives

United States
16.57

United States
-46.80
Washington, D.C., United States
49.83

Corporation
0.00

Washington, United States
-54.98

Australia
80.00

Mexico
33.94

Canada
-16.59

Corporation
80.00
Corporation
53.37
Industries
- 921120
- Legislative Bodies
- 924110
- Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs
- 924120
- Administration of Conservation Programs
- 926110
- Administration of General Economic Programs
- 926120
- Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs