Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - United States Armed Forces

Company Details - United States Armed Forces

United States Armed Forces Logo

United States Armed Forces

Website

United States

The United States Armed Forces is the federal military organization responsible for national defense and security. It consists of five branches: the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard, which operate worldwide, including significant base operations in Okinawa, Japan. The military engages in various operations for global peacekeeping, combat readiness, and disaster response.

CCI Score

CCI Score: United States Armed Forces

-31.67

0.10%

Latest Event

US Armed Forces face scrutiny over sexual assault allegations in Okinawa

An investigation into alleged rape incidents by US Marines stationed at Okinawa military bases has raised concerns over human rights practices within the US Armed Forces, with multiple reports of assaults against local civilians prompting calls for stricter preventive measures.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

United States Armed Forces is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score
Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

  • US Armed Forces face scrutiny over sexual assault allegations in Okinawa Logo
    APR
    24
    2025

    An investigation into alleged rape incidents by US Marines stationed at Okinawa military bases has raised concerns over human rights practices within the US Armed Forces, with multiple reports of assaults against local civilians prompting calls for stricter preventive measures.

  • US Military Implements Expanded Domestic Enforcement at Border Logo
    APR
    11
    2025

    On April 11, 2025, following President Trump’s memorandum, the US Armed Forces expanded their operational role on public civilian lands along the southern border. This move transfers greater authority over these areas to military jurisdiction, raising concerns among civil rights advocates about the militarization of domestic law enforcement and potential erosion of democratic norms.

  • -60

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 24

    The US Armed Forces are set to enforce an expanded mandate over civilian areas at the border following a presidential directive. This operational shift supports an authoritarian model by blurring the line between military and civilian governance, potentially undermining democratic oversight and civil liberties.

    Trump's Expanded Domestic Military Use Should Worry Us All

  • Punitive Political Retaliation Against Military Officers Logo
    FEB
    14
    2025

    An op-ed in Military.com details punitive actions taken by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth against high-ranking military officers, including Gen. Mark Milley and Adm. Linda Fagan, suggesting that these measures are politically motivated and risk undermining the military's apolitical foundation.

  • -40

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 24

    The article highlights politically motivated punitive measures that threaten the apolitical integrity of the armed forces, reflecting an abuse of public and political power. Such actions could suppress dissent and undermine democratic military relations.

    Punishing Military Officers for Political Reasons Endangers Our Troops and Threatens National Security

  • -35

    Executive Political Engagement

    April 24

    The decision by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to initiate investigations and discipline senior officers based on their political stance exemplifies problematic executive political engagement and an overreach that could stifle open debate within military ranks.

    Punishing Military Officers for Political Reasons Endangers Our Troops and Threatens National Security

  • Pentagon Withdraws Media Access, Restricting Press Entry Logo
    FEB
    06
    2025

    The Department of Defense issued a memo withdrawing longstanding access for prominent media outlets to office space in the Pentagon, replacing them with outlets aligned with pro-Trump views. This move, following critical coverage of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, signals an authoritarian tactic to limit press freedom.

  • -80

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 24

    The memo to withdraw media access appears to be a deliberate measure targeting critical press and is indicative of a broader trend toward consolidating state power and limiting democratic oversight, aligning with authoritarian practices.

    Connecting the Dots: Trump’s Tightening Grip on Press Freedom

  • -75

    Media Influence and Propaganda

    April 24

    By reassigning Pentagon office space from established, independent news outlets to those more favorable to Trump's views, the move manipulates media access and reinforces a state-aligned information ecosystem, which is symptomatic of authoritarian control over public discourse.

    Connecting the Dots: Trump’s Tightening Grip on Press Freedom

  • Ethical Concerns in US Military Supply Chains Logo
    JUL
    28
    2024

    A report on military supply chains highlights exploitative labor practices including inadequate wages and excessive working hours among suppliers, raising concerns about supplier transparency, accountability, and human rights in the operations associated with the US Armed Forces.

  • -50

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    April 24

    The article describes exploitative labor practices within military supply chains, including inadequate wages and long working hours. These conditions raise serious labor rights and human rights concerns, reflecting negatively on the ethical practices in the supply network used by the US Armed Forces.

    Understanding Military Supply Chains and Ethics in Defense

  • -60

    Supply Chain Ethics

    April 24

    The article underscores significant ethical concerns in the military supply chains, particularly a lack of supplier transparency and cost-cutting measures that compromise labor standards. This reflects poorly on the ethical sourcing and accountability practices of the US Armed Forces' contracted suppliers.

    Understanding Military Supply Chains and Ethics in Defense

  • Threat to Military Nonpartisanship Amid Partisan Promotion Blocks Logo
    DEC
    15
    2023

    Senator Tuberville’s recent hold on the promotions for 440 senior military officers, along with emerging partisan pressures aimed at influencing military appointments, raises concerns that the longstanding nonpartisan ethos of the US Armed Forces is at risk. Such politicization threatens to compromise national security by prioritizing ideological loyalty over professional merit.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 24

    Political interference, exemplified by Senator Tuberville’s blockade of officer promotions, undermines the key nonpartisan principle that has long safeguarded the military’s objectivity. Such actions risk aligning military decision-making with partisan interests, which is detrimental to national security.

    The Creeping Politicization of the U.S. Military | Foreign Affairs

  • -50

    Executive Political Engagement

    April 24

    There are growing concerns that partisan pressures may lead to the implementation of ideological litmus tests for military appointments. This potential shift from merit-based to partisan-based promotions risks eroding the impartial advisory role of the military and could turn the armed forces into a tool for advancing particular political agendas.

    The Creeping Politicization of the U.S. Military | Foreign Affairs

  • US Armed Forces Modernization to Address Ammunition Supply Chain Shortfalls Logo
    JUL
    01
    2023

    The article details chronic supply chain disruptions in the defense industrial base that are threatening the US Armed Forces’ ability to fully equip training exercises. In response, the government has appropriated millions of dollars and announced a fifteen‐year modernization plan to overhaul outdated production facilities and stabilize the supply of critical materials for medium caliber ammunition. This move is designed to ensure that military training and readiness are maintained despite volatile raw material markets.

  • +20

    Supply Chain Ethics

    April 24

    The efforts to modernize supply chain processes and address bottlenecks in the procurement of training ammunition indicate a proactive attempt to stabilize operations and mitigate risks associated with volatile raw material pricing. This improvement in supply chain ethics under Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility is seen as a positive step supporting a resilient defense industrial base.

    The Impact of Supply Chain Issues on Military Training and Readiness

  • +30

    Economic and Structural Influence

    April 24

    The fifteen‐year modernization plan and significant appropriations to upgrade aging facilities represent a strong structural response to economic and production challenges. This action aims to strengthen the defense industrial base's capacity to meet demand and maintain operational readiness, thereby indirectly reinforcing democratic stability by ensuring an effective and modern military force.

    The Impact of Supply Chain Issues on Military Training and Readiness

  • DoD Enforces Interim Rule Targeting Forced Labor in Defense Supply Chain Logo
    JUN
    09
    2023

    Effective June 9, 2023, the US Department of Defense amended the DFARS provisions, replacing the forced labor certification with a representation requirement. This change compels DoD contractors to perform enhanced supply chain due diligence to ensure that forced labor—particularly from Xinjiang—is not used in their production processes.

  • +80

    Supply Chain Ethics

    April 24

    The interim rule mandates thorough supply chain due diligence which helps prevent the use of forced labor in defense procurement. By emphasizing ethical sourcing and labor rights protections, it supports progressive labor practices and reduces corporate complicity in exploitative systems.

    New Government Forced Labor Actions Reemphasize Supply Chain Diligence for Government Contractors and Importers

  • US Armed Forces Supply Chain Oversight Criticized Logo
    SEP
    22
    2020

    A report from the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights released on September 22 criticizes U.S. federal procurement practices for insufficient oversight of global supply chains, leading to severe labor and human rights abuses. As a key actor in federal procurement, the United States Armed Forces are implicated in these systemic failures, prompting calls for improved monitoring and accountability.

  • -60

    Supply Chain Ethics

    April 24

    The report highlights that U.S. government procurement, which involves the Armed Forces, fails to adequately monitor global supply chains, resulting in significant labor and human rights violations. This deficiency reflects poor supply chain ethics, negatively impacting vulnerable workers and contributing to systemic abuses.

    Countering Rights Abuses in US Government Supply Chains

Industries

928110
National Security
928120
International Affairs