Tony Alamo Foundation

A religious nonprofit organization that has been accused of operating commercial businesses and exploitation of its workers, associated with controversial figure Tony Alamo.

CCI Score

-24.86

0.01% April 18

Latest Event

Tony Alamo Foundation Legal Battle Over Labor Practices

The Tony Alamo Foundation, a religious nonprofit with a controversial history of worker exploitation, is engaged in a legal dispute with the Secretary of Labor. This case raises concerns regarding the foundation's commitment to ethical labor practices and the potential undermining of worker rights, reflecting broader issues of corporate complicity in perpetuating exploitative practices that feed into authoritarian governance methods.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives SEE ALL: NOW Group

TRP

Stonewall Gives Back Initiative
Use Your Voice OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score SUPPORT CCI

ACCOMPLICE

Tony Alamo Foundation is currently rated as an Accomplice.

-20 to -29 CCI Score

These companies profit from authoritarian practices through their business dealings. Although they may not be directly enforcing oppressive policies, their actions contribute to the economic and operational sustenance of authoritarian regimes.

Latest Events

JUN

01

2023

Tony Alamo Foundation Legal Battle Over Labor Practices
-41.42

The Tony Alamo Foundation, a religious nonprofit with a controversial history of worker exploitation, is engaged in a legal dispute with the Secretary of Labor. This case raises concerns regarding the foundation's commitment to ethical labor practices and the potential undermining of worker rights, reflecting broader issues of corporate complicity in perpetuating exploitative practices that feed into authoritarian governance methods.
-50

Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

March 24

The legal confrontation with the Secretary of Labor underscores longstanding allegations of worker exploitation and unethical business practices by the Tony Alamo Foundation. By challenging labor regulations, the organization appears to be resisting external efforts to enforce labor standards, thereby potentially contributing to a broader pattern of undermining workers' rights. From an anti-fascist perspective, such actions support the consolidation of power by entities resistant to democratic labor reforms, signaling complicity in authoritarian practices.

TONY AND SUSAN ALAMO FOUNDATION et al. v. SECRETARY OF LABOR
APR

23

1985

Supreme Court Decision Highlights Labor Exploitation at Tony Alamo Foundation (1985)
-1.28

The 1985 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Alamo Found'n v. Secy. of Labor confirmed that the Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation’s commercial enterprises, which employed vulnerable individuals by compensating them with in-kind benefits instead of cash wages, fell under the protections of the Fair Labor Standards Act. This decision exposed ongoing practices of labor exploitation and unethical treatment of workers within the organization.
-70

Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

March 24

The Supreme Court ruling revealed that the Tony Alamo Foundation exploited vulnerable workers by classifying them in a manner that denied them fair cash wages, substituting benefits that poorly compensated labor. The decision underscored that the organization’s commercial activities, despite its religious nonprofit status, failed to meet ethical labor standards and violated the Fair Labor Standards Act. This outcome reflects broader issues of oppressive labor practices, undermining worker rights and contributing to systemic exploitation.

Alamo Found'n v. Secy. of Labor, 471 U.S. 290 (1985)
JAN

01

1985

Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor Ruling on Exploitative Labor Practices
-1.33

The 1985 Supreme Court decision enforced labor laws on the Tony Alamo Foundation, highlighting its controversial business practices where workers were provided non-cash compensation, raising serious concerns about labor exploitation.
-75

Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

January 1

In the 1985 case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation's classification as a religious organization did not exempt its commercial activities from labor laws. By providing non-cash benefits (food, clothing, shelter) instead of standard wages, the organization engaged in practices that exploited workers, undermining labor rights and fair compensation. This decision underscores the foundation's complicity in labor exploitation, reflecting broader concerns regarding its ethical responsibility in business practices.

Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor (1985)
JAN

01

1985

Tony Alamo Foundation: Exploitative Labor Practices Under Scrutiny in Supreme Court Case
-80.00

The Tony Alamo Foundation has been implicated in exploitative labor practices by operating commercial ventures where workers received non-cash benefits in lieu of proper wages. Critics argue that such practices create an uneven playing field by sidelining labor protections, which can contribute to broader authoritarian business models.
JAN

01

1970

Tony & Susan Alamo Fndn. v. Secretary of Labor
-0.28

The Tony Alamo Foundation, a religious nonprofit organization that operates commercial businesses, challenged the application of federal minimum wage laws by arguing that compensating its workers solely with food and lodging was part of a religious practice. The court rejected this argument, highlighting concerns over worker exploitation and the infringement of labor rights.
-70

Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

March 24

The foundation’s practice of compensating workers (referred to as 'associates') only with food and lodging, under the guise of religious exemption, raises serious labor rights concerns. This approach undermines fair labor practices and exposes vulnerable individuals to exploitation. The court’s rejection of their argument reinforces the view that such practices are ethically and legally problematic, contributing negatively to the company’s complicity in undermining worker protections.

Tony & Susan Alamo Fndn. v. Secretary of Labor