On September 18, 2024, The Walrus published an opinion piece that critically examines the adoption of MAGA‐style politics in Canada, highlighting the dangers of aligning with extremist ideological narratives as embodied by figures like Pierre Poilievre and Trump. The article challenges authoritarian tendencies by scrutinizing how political rhetoric and media influence can exacerbate cultural divisions.

The Walrus published an in‐depth article on July 2, 2024, critically examining the deployment of facial recognition technology in retail settings. The piece highlights concerns over privacy violations, potential misuse of biometric data, and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, contributing to public awareness and resistance against intrusive surveillance measures.

The Walrus published an in‐depth piece on Starbucks' union struggles, highlighting worker challenges and documenting instances of alleged anti-union practices. By providing a platform that amplifies labor rights and exposes corporate missteps, the magazine reinforces progressive, anti-authoritarian perspectives in media.

The Walrus published an investigative article on November 8, 2021, that critically examines how surveillance technologies—such as Ring cameras and social media neighborhood groups—are normalizing a surveillance state. The piece documents how these tools reinforce authoritarian practices and exacerbate social divisions, particularly affecting marginalized communities.

In an editor's letter published on September 16, 2021, The Walrus outlined its longstanding policy of not endorsing political candidates. The piece emphasizes a balanced and nonpartisan approach rooted in its educational mandate, aiming to present reasoned analysis without bias. This stance helps to resist alignment with any authoritarian or extremist political agenda by maintaining impartiality.

The Walrus published an extensive article titled 'Is It Time for Unions to Seize the Moment?' which highlights the importance of unionization amid anti-union tactics and labor suppression. The piece connects historical labor struggles with modern efforts to empower workers, advocating for collective action and progressive labor policies.

The Walrus released an in‐depth investigative report detailing Walmart's systematic anti-union efforts in Canada, exposing practices aimed at suppressing worker organization and promoting authoritarian control over labor.

An investigation reveals that The Walrus has maintained close ties with the Liberal Party through board appointments, politically-affiliated editorial oversight, and government grants. Key figures including former Liberal candidate Seamus O’Regan and Trudeau's insiders have influenced the magazine’s content and its adherence to educational mandates, raising concerns about compromised editorial independence and ethical governance.

An investigation by Canadaland reveals that The Walrus Foundation has deep ties with the Liberal Party of Canada, with politically connected figures influencing its editorial vetting process and contributing to a series of alleged labor practices issues. The report questions the magazine’s adherence to its charitable obligations, noting the role of party-affiliated figures and allegations of workplace abuses including the discontinuation of paid internships and freelancer disputes.

An investigative piece reveals that The Walrus magazine, through its foundation, has fostered close relationships with key Liberal Party figures—such as former MP Seamus O’Regan and Trudeau insider Jonathan Kay—to influence its editorial oversight. In addition, allegations include claims of workplace abuse and the discontinuation of a paid internship program, calling into question the magazine’s adherence to its charitable educational mandate.