Company Directory - The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
Company Details - The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
An organization involved in aid delivery in Gaza, which operates under military command and is part of Israel's demographic strategy in the region.
CCI Score
CCI Score: The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
-30.36
Latest Event
GHF’s Militarized Aid Distribution as an Instrument of Authoritarian Control
On May 27, 2025, The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation launched its first aid distribution center under military command. The operation, as described in the article, channels humanitarian aid through private American contractors and is used as a tool to control and concentrate Palestinian populations, aligning with broader state strategies to undermine humanitarian neutrality.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- MAY272025
On May 27, 2025, The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation launched its first aid distribution center under military command. The operation, as described in the article, channels humanitarian aid through private American contractors and is used as a tool to control and concentrate Palestinian populations, aligning with broader state strategies to undermine humanitarian neutrality.
- MAY272025
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed organization with support from Israel, has initiated a centralized aid distribution system in Gaza that relies on hubs guarded by armed contractors near Israeli military positions. The move has sparked controversy among humanitarian groups and led to the resignation of its executive director, raising concerns about political interference and the potential weaponization of aid.
-30
Public and Political Behavior
May 30
The centralized aid distribution mechanism, established under close ties with Israeli military oversight, indicates potential political manipulation. Such a system may compromise impartial humanitarian aid by aligning it with political and military objectives, a move that echoes elements of authoritarian control.
As U.S.-backed aid group begins Gaza operations, why are some against ...
-40
Executive Political Engagement
May 30
The resignation of the executive director, stemming from concerns over loss of independent operation and increasing governmental oversight, highlights significant executive political interference. This event underlines the risks of leadership being co-opted to serve authoritarian agendas.
As U.S.-backed aid group begins Gaza operations, why are some against ...
- MAY272025
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation launched its aid distribution hubs in Gaza amid significant political interference. The organization's American executive director resigned citing inability to operate independently, and an interim leader was appointed, raising alarms that the foundation is being used as a tool by US and Israeli power brokers to influence Gaza's demographic and political landscape.
-80
Executive Political Engagement
May 30
The resignation of the American executive director and subsequent appointment of an interim leader indicate that the foundation's leadership is compromised by political pressure, undermining its independence. This event reflects significant engagement in executive political dynamics that support authoritarian strategies.
Controversial new U.S. and Israel-backed Gaza aid effort gets off to a slow, tumultuous start
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
May 30
The foundation's operations are intertwined with a politically charged agenda, being backed by US and Israeli interests. This linkage suggests that the humanitarian effort may be used as a mechanism to further strategic demographic and political goals, raising serious concerns about its role in reinforcing authoritarian policies.
Controversial new U.S. and Israel-backed Gaza aid effort gets off to a slow, tumultuous start
- MAY262025
Jake Wood, the executive director of The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, resigned amid controversy over the organization's tightly controlled, US-backed aid distribution model in Gaza. Citing his inability to reconcile the operational framework with the core humanitarian principles of neutrality, independence, and impartiality, Wood’s departure highlights internal dissent regarding the political and military influence shaping the aid delivery mechanism.
+70
Executive Political Engagement
May 30
The resignation of executive director Jake Wood is interpreted as a stand against politically influenced aid operations that compromise humanitarian neutrality. His exit underscores a rejection of an aid model perceived as serving strategic political interests, which aligns with anti-authoritarian sentiment. This move is seen as a positive, progressive step in affirming ethical and impartial humanitarian practices.
- MAY262025
Jake Wood, the executive director of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, resigned amidst growing controversy over the organization’s U.S.-backed aid distribution plan. The plan, accused of weaponizing humanitarian aid by centralizing control and potentially facilitating forced displacement, has sparked criticism from other aid agencies and raised questions about the group's adherence to core humanitarian principles of neutrality and impartiality.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
May 30
The organization's politically charged aid redistribution plan—backed by U.S. interests and aligning with military command—raises significant concerns about the weaponization of aid. Such practices risk political manipulation and forced displacement, positioning the venture within a framework that undermines neutrality and reinforces authoritarian dynamics.
How will Gaza aid distribution work under controversial U.S.-backed group? Here's what we know
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
May 30
The internal disarray evidenced by the sudden resignation of the executive director reflects problematic business practices. The organization’s approach, diverging from established humanitarian neutrality, risks compromising ethical responsibilities and eroding trust among established aid groups.
How will Gaza aid distribution work under controversial U.S.-backed group? Here's what we know
- MAY262025
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has initiated a new aid distribution model in Gaza, establishing centralized food hubs guarded by armed contractors near Israeli military positions. This move has been met with criticism from the U.N. and various humanitarian organizations, who contend that the system risks 'weaponizing aid' and aligning with politically charged strategies.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
May 30
The foundation’s operation is deeply intertwined with political interests, as it is US‐backed and approved by Israel. Its use of centralized hubs near military zones and reliance on armed contractors raises concerns about the potential weaponization of humanitarian aid, aligning it with authoritarian practices.
How a US-backed body plans to handle Gaza’s food distribution and why aid groups oppose it
-30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
May 30
Despite its humanitarian mission, the foundation’s business practices are compromised by a lack of clear independence. The unexpected resignation of its executive director and the opaque funding and management structures suggest ethical and operational issues, further deepening concerns over its potential role in supporting authoritarian policies.
How a US-backed body plans to handle Gaza’s food distribution and why aid groups oppose it
- MAY262025
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American aid organization established in February 2025 and backed by both the Trump administration and the Israeli government, launched aid distribution operations in Gaza on May 26, 2025. The operation faced immediate challenges, including a loss of control over a critical distribution hub and accusations of weaponizing aid for political leverage. The controversy deepened when executive director Jake Wood resigned on May 25, 2025, citing the impossibility of meeting humanitarian objectives while adhering to strict impartial principles.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
May 30
The foundation's operations, underwritten by the Trump administration and Israeli government, have been critiqued for politicizing humanitarian aid. The allegations that aid is being used as a tool to further political and military objectives—combined with the executive director's resignation over ethical concerns—reflect a disturbing alignment with authoritarian practices, undermining the neutrality expected of humanitarian initiatives.
- MAY252025
Jake Wood resigned as Executive Director of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation weeks after the organization’s launch, citing deep concerns over political interference and ethical breaches in the implementation of an aid plan closely coordinated with US and Israeli officials. His resignation underscores a refusal to compromise humanitarian principles such as neutrality and independence in the face of authoritarian pressures.
+80
Executive Political Engagement
May 30
The resignation reflects a decisive stand against political interference, as the executive found it impossible to align the foundation’s operations with core humanitarian ethics. This act challenges the authoritarian use of humanitarian aid for political ends, and supports anti-authoritarian values by prioritizing neutrality and ethical aid delivery.
Blow to Israel-Backed Aid Plan as Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Head Resigns
- MAY192025
Leading humanitarian and human rights organizations have condemned the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation for its politically driven design. Critics note that the foundation, led by former military and security officials and coordinated with Israeli-controlled entry points, fails to uphold key humanitarian principles due to its exclusion of Palestinian input and its role in reinforcing oppressive control measures.
-80
Executive Political Engagement
May 30
The foundation's leadership, composed of ex-military and security figures, and its operation through Israeli-controlled channels demonstrate a clear alignment with authoritarian practices. This politicized structure not only undermines neutrality and independence in humanitarian aid, but also reinforces oppressive regimes, warranting a strongly negative score under Executive Political Engagement.
- MAY162025
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a US-backed initiative, is orchestrating a militarized aid delivery system in Gaza through fortified hubs, biometric screening, and coordination with Israeli military forces, sidelining local authorities and established humanitarian protocols.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
May 30
The initiative is driven by US military veterans and involves coordination with the Israeli military, which effectively uses humanitarian aid as a tool for exerting authoritarian control in Gaza, undermining local autonomy and humanitarian neutrality.
A new aid regime for Gaza: Humanitarian facade, military core
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
May 30
GHF bypasses traditional humanitarian channels and established ethical standards by relying on elite financial networks and private security, aligning its practices with strategic geopolitical and corporate interests rather than humanitarian needs.
A new aid regime for Gaza: Humanitarian facade, military core
-40
Technology and Services Impact
May 30
The use of biometric screening and facial recognition technologies at the aid hubs exemplifies the incorporation of repressive surveillance tools, which can be harnessed to monitor and control vulnerable populations in a conflict zone.
A new aid regime for Gaza: Humanitarian facade, military core
Alternatives

Baltimore, United States
47.98

Corporation
58.90

Corporation
-32.23
Jerusalem, Palestine
64.72
Melbourne, Australia
56.79

Geneva, Switzerland
39.51

Corporation
78.70

Corporation
71.45

Corporation
63.05

Corporation
53.08
Industries
- 624230
- Emergency and Other Relief Services
- 813311
- Human Rights Organizations
- 813312
- Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations