GHF, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, recently launched a new aid distribution system intended to deliver humanitarian relief in Gaza. However, the initiative has drawn sharp criticism after at least 27 Palestinians were killed near a distribution site in Rafah, with reports indicating that military forces fired on individuals straying from designated routes.

The article highlights a controversy over the funding of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's massive humanitarian aid operation, which costs about $143 million a month to feed 1.2 million people. Israeli opposition leaders and major marketing firms are raising questions about a possible covert funding source, hinting that undisclosed financial backers—potentially linked to political interests—may be involved. The opaque origin of the funds has raised concerns about transparency and the possibility of using humanitarian aid for ulterior political gains.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US-backed initiative for Gaza aid run by security firms, is under investigation in Switzerland for concealing funding and allegedly weaponizing humanitarian assistance. Critics argue that its pre-screening of Palestinians and coordination with politically connected security and military figures undermine equitable aid distribution in Gaza.

GHF, a U.S.- and Israel-backed humanitarian initiative, implemented an aid distribution plan in Gaza that has come under fire from the United Nations and humanitarian groups. Critics argue that by involving military security measures, including IDF warning shots, the operation undermines humanitarian neutrality and may serve political objectives, raising concerns over potential complicity in authoritarian practices. The controversy deepened following a fatality and multiple injuries, as well as the abrupt resignation of its founding leader, who cited the inability to uphold core humanitarian principles.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a US and Israel-backed humanitarian initiative, commenced its aid delivery operations in Gaza amid controversy. The operation has faced criticism from the UN and other humanitarian groups for its political entanglements, following the resignation of its American executive director and the appointment of an interim leader, raising concerns over compromised independence and potential alignment with authoritarian agendas.

Jake Wood, the executive director of the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, resigned citing violations of humanitarian principles. In his departure statement, Wood argued that the organization’s collaboration with a US military company and alignment with Israeli strategies compromised the humanitarian mission. His resignation followed heavy criticism from the UN and longstanding humanitarian groups, marking a principled stand against practices seen as enabling authoritarian control in Gaza.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, established in February 2025 and backed by the Trump administration and the Israeli government, has been criticized for politicizing aid distribution in Gaza. Critics, including United Nations officials and humanitarian groups, claim that the foundation’s model of conditional aid—where approval hinges on political objectives—undermines the neutrality of humanitarian efforts. This controversy was underscored by the resignation of executive director Jake Wood on May 25, 2025, who cited the impossibility of upholding humanitarian principles under such politicized conditions.