Company Directory - Securities and Exchange Commission
Company Details - Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities and Exchange Commission
WebsiteWashington, D.C., United States
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is a federal agency responsible for regulating the securities markets. It aims to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation. Recently, the SEC has been involved in the formulation of a Crypto Task Force to address digital asset regulation and ensure compliance with securities laws.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Securities and Exchange Commission
32.58
-0.02%
Latest Event
SEC Advances Crypto Regulation with New Task Force Framework
The Securities and Exchange Commission is expected to release its first-ever digital asset framework through its new Crypto Task Force. This effort aims to bring clearer regulatory oversight to the crypto industry, potentially enhancing investor protection and market fairness.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support SEC by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
DISSENTER
Securities and Exchange Commission is currently rated as a Dissenter.
Latest Events
- MAY292025
The Securities and Exchange Commission is expected to release its first-ever digital asset framework through its new Crypto Task Force. This effort aims to bring clearer regulatory oversight to the crypto industry, potentially enhancing investor protection and market fairness.
- APR082025
A bill (S. 1358 TASK Act) proposes to require the SEC to mandate reporting on companies' supply chain sourcing and due diligence practices, specifically targeting links to forced labor in Xinjiang, China. The legislation is intended to increase transparency and accountability in supply chains and promote ethical business practices.
+75
Supply Chain Ethics
May 29
The proposed legislation would require the SEC to enforce reporting on supply chain sourcing and due diligence, especially for products linked to forced labor in Xinjiang. This move is viewed positively from an anti-fascist perspective as it strengthens corporate accountability, promotes ethical sourcing, and curbs exploitation. The measure supports increased transparency and worker rights, aligning with broader progressive and anti-authoritarian objectives.
- APR082025
A bill introduced in the 119th Congress (S.1358) would require the Securities and Exchange Commission to mandate reporting on companies' sourcing and due diligence activities, specifically focusing on supply chains linked to forced labor from Xinjiang, China. This legislative push aims to improve transparency and curb unethical supply chain practices.
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
May 29
The proposed bill directs the SEC to enforce reporting requirements on companies regarding sourcing practices, particularly to uncover forced labor in supply chains. Such measures promote ethical business practices and enhance corporate transparency, aligning with anti-authoritarian and anti-fascist principles by defending workers' rights and disrupting supply chains linked to human rights abuses.
- FEB182025
A study published on ScienceDirect reveals that the SEC's enforcement activities, particularly investigations into financially misaligned firms, are influenced by partisan bias. The research highlights that political appointees and career concerns among SEC commissioners contribute to differential treatment, with misaligned firms facing more intensive scrutiny and harsher penalties, thereby calling into question the agency's impartial regulatory mission.
-45
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The study demonstrates that the SEC's investigations are influenced by partisan considerations, with politically misaligned firms being targeted more aggressively. This partisan bias undermines the agency's mandate to enforce regulations impartially and reflects a concerning deviation from fair market governance.
-40
Executive Political Engagement
May 29
The analysis highlights that the SEC's top leadership, comprised of politically appointed commissioners, exhibit partisanship that influences their enforcement decisions. Their career-driven motives to align with partisan interests contribute to preferential regulatory actions, which raises serious concerns about political interference in regulatory practices.
- JAN212025
Following the designation of SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda as Acting Chair on January 21, 2025, the SEC initiated a series of key policy updates. These include the formation of a Crypto Task Force, updated guidance on disclosure and compliance filings, temporary exemptions related to short sale reporting, revised shareholder proposal guidelines, and the launch of a Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit to combat cyber fraud and protect investors. These reforms collectively aim to enhance regulatory clarity, investor protection, and modernized oversight over emerging digital and cyber-related risks.
+60
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The SEC’s leadership change and subsequent rollout of progressive policy measures, including the Crypto Task Force and updated disclosure guidance, demonstrate a proactive public stance aimed at increasing transparency and protecting investors. This indicates a commitment to public accountability and regulatory oversight that aligns with anti-authoritarian and progressive objectives.
+40
Technology and Services Impact
May 29
The establishment of the Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit within the SEC illustrates a forward-thinking approach to regulate technological risks associated with cyber fraud and digital asset markets. This unit is designed to safeguard retail investors and counteract potentially undemocratic practices enabled via technology, aligning with anti-fascist, progressive regulatory measures.
- JAN212025
On January 21, 2025, SEC Acting Chairman Mark T. Uyeda announced the launch of a new cryptocurrency task force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce. The move aims to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, marking a shift from the SEC's previous reliance on enforcement actions to a more structured rulemaking process.
+40
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The SEC's establishment of a cryptocurrency task force represents proactive public and political behavior by shifting from a heavy-handed enforcement approach towards clearer and more transparent regulatory guidelines. This step is viewed positively as it aims to reduce regulatory ambiguity and support fair practices in the rapidly evolving digital asset sector.
The SEC's New Cryptocurrency Task Force: A Step Toward Regulatory Clarity
- JAN212025
On January 21, 2025, Acting Chair Uyeda launched a Crypto Task Force led by Commissioner Hester Peirce to develop a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptoassets. At the same time, the SEC dismissed existing enforcement actions and reversed progressive guidance on shareholder proposals and climate disclosure rules, weakening regulatory oversight.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The SEC’s dismissal of enforcement actions and reversal of Biden-era guidance signal a retreat from robust oversight. These moves favor entrenched corporate interests over progressive regulatory accountability, undermining protections that safeguard workers and marginalized communities.
SEC Moves to Create Regulatory Framework for Cryptocurrencies)
-35
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
May 29
The reversal of progressive initiatives—such as withdrawing defense of climate disclosure rules and altering guidance on shareholder proposals—reduces corporate accountability and compromises ethical business practices, thereby undermining protections for vulnerable communities and the environment.
SEC Moves to Create Regulatory Framework for Cryptocurrencies)
- OCT152024
On October 15, 2024, a compliance guide highlighted the SEC's enforcement of Rule 206(4)-5, which is designed to curb pay-to-play practices among investment advisers by restricting political campaign contributions by covered associates. The rule includes measures such as a two-year time-out on receiving compensation if prohibited contributions are made, alongside provisions for screening, return of contributions, and regular compliance audits to mitigate undue political influence.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The SEC’s Rule 206(4)-5 acts as a preventative measure against corruption by targeting pay-to-play practices. By establishing strict guidelines and time-outs related to political contributions, the rule promotes transparent and accountable political interactions, which aligns with anti-fascist and anti-authoritarian principles. This regulatory action curbs the potential influence of money in politics and safeguards public decision-making.
- JUL092024
The SEC is actively enforcing the Pay-to-Play Rule to prevent improper political contributions by investment advisers, as demonstrated by a recent case involving a $4,000 contribution triggering enforcement measures. This action underscores the regulator’s commitment to maintaining a fair and transparent political process.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The SEC’s robust enforcement of the Pay-to-Play Rule reinforces its commitment to preventing undue political influence and corruption. By holding investment advisers accountable for even minor infractions, the SEC demonstrates a proactive stance in safeguarding democratic processes, aligning with anti-authoritarian and progressive values.
SEC Political Contributions Rule Refresher - Schulte Roth & Zabel
- NOV292023
Following a ruling against it by a three-judge appellate panel over its in-house enforcement procedures, the SEC requested Supreme Court review to defend its established process for adjudicating securities law violations, a move seen as upholding regulatory protections amid conservative legal challenges.
+40
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The SEC's action in seeking Supreme Court intervention to defend its use of in-house administrative law judges stands as a defense against conservative efforts to undermine regulatory power. Defending its established enforcement process is crucial for maintaining investor protections and resisting authoritarian encroachments on administrative functions.
Supreme Court probes Securities and Exchange Commission's enforcement power
- JUL012023
A GAO report from July 2023 evaluates the SEC's conflict minerals disclosure rule, noting that some companies report incomplete supply chain information and may perceive a lack of enforcement. This raises concerns about the SEC’s effectiveness in compelling transparency to deter human rights abuses linked to conflict minerals.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The GAO report indicates that due to perceived weak enforcement of the conflict minerals disclosure rule, companies might report incomplete information. This undermines the SEC’s role in ensuring corporate transparency and accountability, potentially failing to deter practices linked to human rights abuses and conflict financing.
PDF July 2023 CONFLICT MINERALS - U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report
- JUN012023
The SEC has established a Crypto Task Force to bring clarity to the application of federal securities laws in the crypto asset market. The task force, led by Commissioner Hester M. Peirce, aims to foster innovation while protecting investors and ensuring transparent regulatory practices through public engagement and coordination with other regulators.
+50
Public and Political Behavior
May 29
The SEC’s initiative with the Crypto Task Force and the designation of Commissioner Hester M. Peirce to lead the effort highlights a proactive regulatory approach. This action is aimed at clarifying crypto asset rules to protect investors and promote transparency, aligning with anti-authoritarian and anti-fascist values.
- SEP132010
A GAO report outlined that in 2010 the SEC finalized and implemented a rule prohibiting investment advisers from providing compensated advisory services to government clients within two years of making political contributions. The measure is intended to prevent pay-to-play practices and enhance transparency in political financial activities, with the report confirming the SEC’s adherence to applicable procedural requirements.
+80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
May 29
The rule directly addresses and restricts pay-to-play practices by investment advisers, reducing undue political influence and mitigating risks associated with political corruption. This anti-fascist measure ensures greater transparency and accountability, curbing the potential for authoritarian influence in government contracting.
Securities and Exchange Commission: Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
- JAN012010
The SEC’s Pay-to-Play rule (Rule 206(4)-5) strictly limits political contributions by investment advisers to avoid conflicts of interest in awarding government contracts. This regulatory measure aims to promote transparency, fairness, and integrity in government-related financial engagements, thus reducing the risk of authoritarian favoritism.
+80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
May 29
By enforcing the pay-to-play rule, the SEC prevents investment advisers from leveraging political contributions to secure lucrative government contracts. This policy fosters a level playing field, mitigates undue influence, and aligns with anti-fascist principles by promoting transparency and accountability in public finance.
Understanding the Pay-to-Play SEC Rule: Political Contributions
Alternatives
St. Louis, United States
-38.76
Charlotte, United States
-10.11

New York, United States
-11.89

Milwaukee, United States
-4.79

Toronto, Canada
10.16

Corporation
-5.62
Bala Cynwyd, United States
7.97

New York, United States
-1.73

New York City, United States
-22.91

Istanbul, Turkey
51.89
Industries
- 523210
- Securities and Commodity Exchanges
- 523110
- Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
- 523120
- Securities Brokerage
- 523900
- Other Financial Investment Activities
- 523130
- Commodity Contracts Dealing