Company Directory - Police and Border Guard Board
Company Details - Police and Border Guard Board

Police and Border Guard Board
WebsiteEstonia
The Police and Border Guard Board is an agency of the Republic of Estonia responsible for maintaining public order, performing border control, and ensuring national security. It engages in various activities including policing, managing immigration processes, and executing customs duties. The Board also focuses on community safety and public crime prevention initiatives.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Police and Border Guard Board
-42.70
0.02%
Latest Event
PPA's Arbitrary Denial of Residency for Ukrainian Citizens
The Police and Border Guard Board has been criticized for deliberately ignoring the rule of law by leaving residence permit applications of Ukrainian citizens unreviewed and imposing arbitrary, burdensome requirements, raising concerns about its adherence to legal principles and the protection of human rights.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Police and Border Guard Board is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- APR042025
The Police and Border Guard Board has been criticized for deliberately ignoring the rule of law by leaving residence permit applications of Ukrainian citizens unreviewed and imposing arbitrary, burdensome requirements, raising concerns about its adherence to legal principles and the protection of human rights.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
The agency's practice of unreviewed application processing and imposing arbitrary requirements undermines the rule of law, effectively restricting the rights of Ukrainian citizens. This approach suggests an authoritarian use of administrative power, negatively impacting public trust and democratic principles.
Nora Kurik: PPA knowingly ignoring principle of the rule of law
- MAR192025
On March 19, 2025, the Estonian Police and Border Guard Board announced the rollout of mobile autonomous cameras on patrol cars. These AI-powered devices will automatically record traffic violations using facial recognition and license plate recognition technology, raising significant concerns about privacy, potential misidentification, and the expansion of state surveillance capabilities.
-50
Provision of Repressive Technologies
April 7
The deployment of AI-based mobile autonomous cameras with capabilities such as facial recognition represents a step towards increased surveillance. From an anti-fascist perspective, employing such technology risks mirroring repressive measures commonly associated with authoritarian regimes, potentially infringing on civil liberties and privacy rights.
- DEC092024
The Estonian Police and Border Guard Board is set to implement a Smart Borders system funded by over €2 million from the European Commission. The system will use advanced surveillance technology — including drones, cameras, radars, and other security equipment — to monitor border traffic and enhance border control measures, an initiative which raises concerns over potential authoritarian surveillance practices.
-60
Provision of Repressive Technologies
April 7
The event highlights the deployment of advanced surveillance technologies by the Police and Border Guard Board, a move that, while framed as a security measure, carries risks of facilitating state overreach and authoritarian control. The use of such repressive technologies can curb individual freedoms and targeted marginalized communities, aligning with trends observed in authoritarian regimes.
- NOV012024
The Police and Border Guard Board, acting as the lead applicant, joined Lithuania in applying for EU funding to establish a militarized 'drone wall' along the border with Russia and Belarus. The initiative, aimed at enhancing border surveillance and security, was ultimately denied funding by the EU.
- OCT192024
The Board has entered a 12‐month contract with surveillance equipment distributor Optimus Systems for advanced security systems along the Estonian-Russian border, with the contract period beginning on October 19. The acquisition raises concerns about increased state surveillance capabilities and potential impacts on civil liberties.
-30
Provision of Repressive Technologies
April 7
By procuring advanced surveillance technology, the Police and Border Guard Board bolsters state monitoring capabilities along a sensitive border. This move, while ostensibly for security, raises concerns from an anti-fascist perspective about the expansion of surveillance powers which could potentially be misused to infringe on civil liberties.
Estonia Tallinn calls in surveillance equipment distributor Optimus ...
- JUL272023
A court ruling on July 27, 2023 found that the Police and Border Guard Board failed to properly assess an international protection claim for a transgender Ukrainian applicant. The court determined that the Board’s procedure was drastically deficient, lacking a cumulative evaluation of the applicant’s gender identity, nationality, and political context, and mandated that the case be re-reviewed with proper legal support.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
The court ruling exposed serious administrative shortcomings in how the Board processed an asylum claim that involved a vulnerable transgender applicant with Ukrainian ties. This neglect to consider multiple crucial aspects of the individual's situation undermines public accountability and fair treatment, echoing authoritarian tendencies in the denial of rights.
Court Ruling: Serious Deficiencies Found in the Procedure of Police and Border Guard Board
- MAR202023
In March 2023, the Tallinn Administrative Court declared that the forced deportation of a Ukrainian asylum seeker, Roman, by the Police and Border Guard Board was unlawful. The court ordered the agency to compensate him for both material and non-material damages after Roman, pressured during his temporary protection application process, filed a complaint with the help of the Estonian Human Rights Centre.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
The incident reveals a serious misuse of state power by the Police and Border Guard Board, where the forced deportation of an asylum seeker undermined human rights and reflects authoritarian tendencies in migration enforcement. The subsequent court ruling against the Board, which did not contest the decision, further underscores systemic issues in the public exercise of authority that can harm marginalized groups.
Deported Ukrainian Won a Court Case against the Estonian State – Estonian Human Rights Centre
- JUL062022
The Estonian Police and Border Guard Board entered into an agreement with G4S in Estonia to purchase, install, and maintain marine surveillance equipment at a secret location. The technology, which includes radar, cameras, and thermal imaging, will help monitor the sea border for unidentified vessels and potential illegal activities.
-35
Provision of Repressive Technologies
April 7
The secretive nature of the contract to deploy advanced surveillance technologies raises concerns about transparency and potential overreach, aligning with issues related to repressive technologies. From an anti-fascist perspective, such measures could be co-opted to enable authoritarian practices, since increased surveillance without public oversight may suppress dissent and infringe on civil liberties.
- JUN062022
Estonia's planned amendment to the State Borders Act would authorize the Police and Border Guard Board to implement pushbacks during mass migration emergencies, potentially breaching international and EU law and raising human rights concerns.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
The proposed legislative change empowers the Police and Border Guard Board to deny asylum processing by legally authorizing pushbacks. This policy, by potentially violating international and EU legal standards and undermining refugees' rights, is indicative of an authoritarian approach to border control. Such repressive measures align with practices that suppress human rights and facilitate state-driven exclusionary policies.
Alternatives

New Delhi, India
22.56

Ludington, United States
22.01

Washington, United States
-20.00

Washington, United States
-6.62

United States
-61.61

Upper Marlboro, United States
28.99

Columbus Grove, United States
24.27
San Antonio, United States
-27.52

Seoul, South Korea
-39.98

France
-43.23
Industries
- 922120
- Police Protection
- 922130
- Legal Counsel and Prosecution
- 922190
- Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities