Facing mounting political and legal pressure from South Carolina’s push to bar Medicaid funding and the Trump Administration’s freeze on Title X funds, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic is defending its commitment to providing comprehensive reproductive health care. The organization continues to accept Medicaid patients and actively challenges the restrictive policies in court, underscoring its dedication to serving marginalized communities.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic has filed a lawsuit to contest South Carolina's executive order that seeks to terminate its status as a Medicaid provider. The legal action aims to safeguard essential non-abortion services for low-income patients and resist politically motivated efforts to restrict health care access.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic is at the center of a Supreme Court case challenging a South Carolina policy that restricts Medicaid patients' access to essential reproductive health services. The case underscores the fight against politically motivated efforts to curtail healthcare access for marginalized communities.

Planned Parenthood of South Atlantic is contesting a state defunding order in the Supreme Court that was initiated by anti-abortion Republican officials, seen as part of broader efforts to undermine reproductive rights. The legal battle highlights the organization's stand against politically motivated barriers to Medicaid funding.

Following oral arguments in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, a federal district court ordered South Carolina to restore Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, affirming patients' rights to choose their healthcare provider. The decision came after the state initially ruled that Planned Parenthood was not qualified to receive taxpayer funding. This legal remedy supports access to comprehensive healthcare for low-income individuals.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, facing state efforts to strip it of Medicaid funding, filed a lawsuit challenging the termination of its provider agreements. The legal action defends patients' rights to choose their healthcare provider amid broader efforts by anti-abortion groups and government officials to curtail access to reproductive health services.