Company Directory - Partnership for Public Service
Company Details - Partnership for Public Service
Partnership for Public Service
WebsiteWashington, D.C., United States
A non-partisan organization that promotes a more effective government by advocating for public service reform.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Partnership for Public Service
8.01
20.66%
Latest Event
PPS CEO Criticizes Trump’s Schedule G Policy
Partnership for Public Service CEO Max Stier criticized Trump’s new Schedule G policy, stating that expanding political appointments further complicates the civil service system and undermines the stable, merit-based framework that ensures effective government service.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support PPS by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
OBJECTOR
Partnership for Public Service is currently rated as an Objector.
Latest Events
- JUL222025
Partnership for Public Service CEO Max Stier criticized Trump’s new Schedule G policy, stating that expanding political appointments further complicates the civil service system and undermines the stable, merit-based framework that ensures effective government service.
- MAR032025
Partnership for Public Service, a federal civil service advocacy group, laid off over a quarter of its workforce amid pressures from the second Trump administration, signaling a setback in its commitment to support civil service employees.
-50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
July 22
The organization’s decision to lay off more than a quarter of its workforce undermines labor stability and worker rights, which is especially concerning given its role in advocating for civil service employees. This mass layoff reduces its capacity to defend workers against authoritarian shifts and signals a troubling deterioration in its internal labor practices.
Layoffs hit federal civil service advocacy group - E&E News by POLITICO
- FEB282025
On February 28, 2025, the Partnership for Public Service laid off more than 40 employees—over a quarter of its workforce—citing forecasts of dwindling government contracts amid Trump administration policies. The move, announced by CEO Max Stier as a necessary reorganization, raises concerns over worker rights and underscores the broader impact of government downsizing measures.
-50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
July 22
The significant layoffs at the Partnership for Public Service negatively impact worker rights and fair labor practices. Reducing over 25% of its workforce in response to anticipated reductions in government contracts reflects an adverse treatment of employees and a disregard for labor stability, particularly in a time when government workforce cuts are already affecting civil servants.
- FEB202025
In its 2023 Impact Report, the Partnership for Public Service detailed a series of initiatives aimed at strengthening public institutions and federal workforce capacity. The report highlights training programs for federal employees, leadership development for civil servants including the integration of ethical artificial intelligence practices, and broader strategies to defend democratic government functions amid rising political polarization.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
July 22
The report emphasizes proactive measures to defend democratic institutions and the non-partisan civil service, reinforcing public trust and resilience against authoritarian tendencies. This public and political behavior reflects a strong commitment to maintaining robust democratic governance.
+50
Technology and Services Impact
July 22
The report outlines training programs that include modules on the effective and ethical use of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, which contribute to modernizing government services in an inclusive manner.
+60
Economic and Structural Influence
July 22
By providing strategic guidance and support to federal agencies, the Partnership for Public Service is shaping institutional reforms that enhance the effectiveness and resilience of government structures, thereby mitigating forces that could lead to authoritarian practices.
Alternatives
Pasadena, USA
62.41
Corporation
66.06
Corporation
65.11
Corporation
52.70
Corporation
42.32
Corporation
-27.65
Washington, United States
69.04
Washington, D.C., United States
53.40
Dallas, United States
44.47
Chicago, United States
22.07
Industries
- 541611
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- 611430
- Professional and Management Development Training
- 813920
- Professional Organizations