Following ICE raids in Los Angeles that sparked mass protests and clashes with police, President Donald Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops and 700 Marines to restore order. This move underscores the use of military force in domestic disturbances, raising concerns about the militarization of civil response.

The National Guard was deployed in Los Angeles as part of a federalization effort by the Trump administration, raising serious concerns about the militarization of domestic affairs and the erosion of democratic norms.

The article details how President Trump ordered the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to peaceful protests amid ICE raids, an action widely viewed as an authoritarian measure that undermines democratic norms.

Amid violent protests following ICE raids in Los Angeles, National Guard troops were deployed by the Trump administration to restore order. This politically charged deployment is seen as a state enforcement action that risks suppressing dissent.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its federalized deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles without the governor’s consent. The suit alleges that the order, issued amid protests and immigration-related unrest, represents an overreach of executive power that undermines state sovereignty and risks politicizing military force for partisan ends.

The article reports that President Trump ordered the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles to quell violent anti-ICE protests, which resulted in dozens of arrests amid clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement.

The article reports concerns among National Guard troops about being potentially deployed for mass deportations under a Trump administration plan. The political maneuvering by Republican governors and the president’s proposals signal a departure from the Guard’s traditional, apolitical role, raising fears of authoritarian misuse of military force for immigration enforcement.

A new Justice Department agreement, which resolved a lawsuit by Connecticut labor unions, has paved the way for National Guard members on state duty to unionize. This overturns the traditional prohibition under a 1978 law on unionization for military personnel on federal duty, thereby advancing labor rights for these individuals.

Following a federal lawsuit in Connecticut, the Department of Justice settled the case, clarifying that National Guard members on state duty can join unions. This decision removes previous legal obstacles, empowering Guard members to organize for better pay, benefits, and working conditions—a move welcomed by union advocates and already sparking similar efforts in Texas.

The Department of Justice reached a settlement in Connecticut on May 17 confirming that National Guard members on state active duty can unionize without fear of federal criminal penalties. This decision paves the way for union organizing and improved labor conditions for Guard members serving under state orders.