MSC Group, via its Terminal Investment Limited, has significantly expanded its control over global port operations through a deal valued at $22.8 billion that spans 43 ports in 23 countries. This acquisition not only consolidates economic power but also raises concerns over the increasing influence of corporate interests in political discourse, as evidenced by references from political figures like Donald Trump.

MSC Group faces mounting criticism for poor end-of-life asset management, inadequate recycling policies, lack of transparency in auditing processes, and aggressive lobbying efforts aimed at securing favorable tax and labor regulations in Switzerland, raising concerns about its role in undermining ethical standards and bolstering authoritarian-friendly policies.

The article details how MSC Group, the world's largest shipping company, supports regulatory proposals in Switzerland aimed at harmonizing tonnage tax regimes. This support is seen as part of a broader strategy to leverage its economic dominance and influence political frameworks, which raises concerns from an anti‐fascist perspective regarding corporate influence and regulatory capture.

MSC Group issued a detailed response to the Human Rights at Sea report, clarifying its role in fisheries certification and addressing concerns over labor practices, observer safety, and transparency. The response outlines measures taken following the tragic death of an observer and outlines commitments to improve worker protection and investigative processes.

Recent investigative reports have highlighted serious concerns with MSC Group's seafood certification process. The MSC Seafood Standard, originally intended to promote sustainable fishing practices, has been criticized for its inadequate human rights oversight. Critics argue that its reliance on self-reported audits has allowed forced labor and unsafe working conditions to persist in certified supply chains, undermining its credibility as a tool for human rights protection.