Company Directory - Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)
Company Details - Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)

Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)
WebsiteWashington, United States
The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is the primary law enforcement agency responsible for public safety in Washington, D.C. It provides various police services including crime prevention, criminal investigations, traffic enforcement, and community policing.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Metropolitan Police Department (MPD)
-18.99
0.06%
Latest Event
MPD Enhances Security Measures Following Terrorist Attack
After the fatal shooting of Israeli embassy staff and heightened anti-Semitic threats following the attack, MPD increased police presence around schools, faith-based organizations, and community centers in Washington, D.C. The move is aimed at protecting vulnerable communities and countering hate-driven violence.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
ENABLER
Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is currently rated as an Enabler.
Latest Events
- MAY232025
After the fatal shooting of Israeli embassy staff and heightened anti-Semitic threats following the attack, MPD increased police presence around schools, faith-based organizations, and community centers in Washington, D.C. The move is aimed at protecting vulnerable communities and countering hate-driven violence.
- JUN242024
The Metropolitan Police Department announced the deployment of drones, additional CCTV cameras, and license plate readers in Washington, D.C. as part of efforts to enhance crime prevention. However, this move has drawn criticism from civil liberties advocates over concerns of increased state surveillance and potential infringements on privacy.
-80
Provision of Repressive Technologies
May 23
The decision by MPD to expand its surveillance toolkit by introducing drones, CCTV cameras, and license plate readers is seen as an escalation in the use of repressive technologies. Although intended for crime prevention, such measures can easily be exploited to suppress dissent and infringe on citizens' privacy rights, a hallmark of authoritarian practices.
DC police to use drones plus more cameras and license-plate readers
- FEB042023
The DC Police Union, which represents over 3,600 officers of the Metropolitan Police Department, hired lobbyists on February 4 to pressure Congress into overturning recent reforms to the criminal code aimed at increasing accountability and public safety. This political maneuver supports conservative agendas that potentially undermine efforts for police accountability and reform.
-70
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
May 23
The hiring of lobbyists by the police union, affiliated with the MPD, to push for the repeal of progressive criminal justice reforms represents a politically charged action that undermines efforts to increase transparency and accountability. This supports conservative strategies that can enable authoritarian practices by resisting reforms designed to protect marginalized communities and promote due process.
DC Police Union hired lobbyists to push Congress to overturn city's crime bill
- JUN042021
An ACLU article discusses how police lobbyists, through powerful lobbying efforts, undermine reform and accountability in law enforcement, which can compromise public safety. This dynamic raises concerns about the influence of police unions in shaping policies that may favor authoritarian practices.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
May 23
The article highlights the detrimental effects of police lobbying, which obstructs comprehensive reform and accountability in law enforcement. This political influence, often driven by police unions, is seen as reinforcing authoritarian practices that undermine public safety. As a result, the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is implicated through its association with systemic lobbying practices, warranting a negative score in the 'Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts' category.
- MAY012021
In May 2021, Distributed Denial of Secrets republished a leak of over 90,000 emails from the MPD. The documents revealed that the department had been surveilling right-wing extremist groups and detailed its response to the January 6 United States Capitol attack, suggesting a proactive security measure aimed at countering extremist threats.
+50
Public and Political Behavior
May 23
The leak shows that MPD was actively monitoring groups associated with far-right extremism. From an anti-fascist perspective, this surveillance indicates a commitment to countering extremist elements that threaten democratic values and marginalized communities. The action is interpreted as a political behavior that supports security against authoritarian movements.
- JUL012020
Public records obtained from a lawsuit reveal that the MPD collaborated with federal agencies to surveil racial justice protestors during the summer of 2020 and into 2021. The department compiled extensive social media data, shared lists of protestors and activists with multiple federal agencies, and engaged in practices that raise concerns about violations of constitutional rights and the suppression of dissent.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
May 23
The MPD’s actions of surveilling and sharing information on protestors illustrate a form of repressive political behavior that undermines the constitutional rights to free speech and protest. This practice contributes to an atmosphere of authoritarian control and targets marginalized communities, warranting a negative rating.
Records Show DC and Federal Law Enforcement Sharing Surveillance Info on Racial Justice Protests
-70
Provision of Repressive Technologies
May 23
The MPD’s use of technology to systematically monitor social media data on protestors, including marginalized and activist groups, demonstrates the deployment of repressive technologies. This surveillance facilitates a climate of intimidation and potential overreach, reflecting practices that support authoritarian control rather than protecting civil liberties.
Records Show DC and Federal Law Enforcement Sharing Surveillance Info on Racial Justice Protests
- FEB132018
A lawsuit filed by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund alleges that the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) has colluded with right-wing groups such as Project Veritas and Oath Keepers to surveil and infiltrate protest groups, potentially bypassing legal restrictions protecting free speech and assembly.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
May 23
The lawsuit claims that MPD is collaborating with politically motivated right-wing organizations to perform surveillance on protest groups. This alleged behavior undermines democratic accountability, free expression, and community trust by effectively using politically biased third parties to perform intelligence activities, resonating with authoritarian practices.
Lawsuit Over Police Collusion with Right-Wing Organizations to Infiltrate and Surveil Protest Groups
- APR012015
MPD coordinated with intelligence fusion centers and contracted vendors such as Babel Street, Dataminr, Sprinklr, and others to monitor social media activity related to protests and demonstrations. The department provided specific search terms and procured licenses to track posts, contributing to a surveillance regime that can suppress dissent and inhibit freedom of assembly.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
May 23
By supplying targeted search terms to its fusion center and surveillance vendors, MPD actively harnessed state power to monitor protest activity. This action risks suppressing dissent and curtailing civil liberties, reflecting an alignment with authoritarian practices.
DC Metropolitan Police Department Social Media Monitoring Documents
-50
Technology and Services Impact
May 23
MPD's reliance on advanced surveillance tools from vendors such as Dataminr, Babel Street, and Sprinklr underscores its use of technology that facilitates pervasive, real‑time monitoring of social media. This not only heightens the potential for overreach but also raises serious concerns about invasive state surveillance.
DC Metropolitan Police Department Social Media Monitoring Documents
Alternatives

Upper Marlboro, United States
28.55

Columbus Grove, United States
23.93

Ludington, United States
21.85

Tallahassee, United States
-10.92

Washington, United States
-13.67
New York City, United States
-15.19

Washington, United States
-20.00

United States
-62.22

New Delhi, India
22.32

Athens, Greece
-16.18
Industries
- 922120
- Police Protection
- 922130
- Legal Counsel and Prosecution