Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Meta Business Partners

Company Details - Meta Business Partners

Meta Business Partners Logo

Meta Business Partners

Meta Business Partners is a program initiated by Meta that recognizes companies with proven technical expertise and robust services. These vetted companies help businesses grow by offering specialized digital marketing and advertising solutions.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Meta Business Partners

-37.48

0.02%

Latest Event

Meta Lobbying and Political Contributions Reveal Authoritarian Ties

Recent data from OpenSecrets on Meta highlights significant lobbying expenditures and a troubling revolving door phenomenon among lobbyists, raising concerns over the company's influence on public policy and its potential complicity in bolstering authoritarian practices.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

Meta Business Partners is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score
Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

  • Meta Lobbying and Political Contributions Reveal Authoritarian Ties Logo
    FEB
    19
    2025

    Recent data from OpenSecrets on Meta highlights significant lobbying expenditures and a troubling revolving door phenomenon among lobbyists, raising concerns over the company's influence on public policy and its potential complicity in bolstering authoritarian practices.

  • -60

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 27

    Meta's substantial political contributions ($5.53M) and especially its large lobbying expenditure ($24.43M) demonstrate a consistent effort to shape policy. Such financial commitments, along with evidence of a revolving door in their lobbying staff, raise serious concerns about the company's role in undermining democratic accountability and supporting authoritarian practices.

    Meta Profile: Summary • OpenSecrets

  • -50

    Executive Political Engagement

    March 27

    The revolving door phenomenon is evident with a high proportion of Meta lobbyists having previously held government positions. This close connection between former public officials and the company's political staff suggests an undue level of executive political engagement, which can facilitate influence over policy in ways that erode democratic principles.

    Meta Profile: Summary • OpenSecrets

  • Meta Record Lobbying Efforts Amid TikTok Ban Debate Logo
    JAN
    22
    2025

    In 2024, Meta set a record in lobbying expenditures in Washington, D.C. as it attempted to influence legislation during debates over a potential TikTok ban and content moderation reforms. This aggressive lobbying effort highlights the company's prioritization of corporate interests over public accountability, potentially fueling authoritarian practices by blocking progressive regulatory measures.

  • -70

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 27

    Meta's record lobbying spending, as reported in early 2025 for activities in 2024, represents a significant effort to influence political outcomes in favor of corporate interests. By engaging in high-level lobbying during sensitive legislative debates on TikTok and content moderation, Meta aligns its actions with strategies that undermine democratic oversight and may reinforce authoritarian governance. This mode of political engagement is viewed negatively from an anti-fascist perspective, suggesting corporate complicity in bolstering undemocratic power structures.

    Meta Spends Record Lobbying Sum Amid TikTok Ban Debate

  • Meta Shifts Right: Dismantling DEI and Aligning with Authoritarian Policies Logo
    JAN
    15
    2025

    Meta Business Partners, operating under the Meta umbrella, terminated key diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and realigned its policies to support ultra-conservative, Trump-administration priorities as outlined in Project 2025. This shift undermines long-standing initiatives to support marginalized communities and has altered both internal business practices and its role in shaping public discourse.

  • -80

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    Meta's realignment under CEO Mark Zuckerberg—to terminate DEI programs and forge stronger ties with the incoming Trump administration—reflects a significant shift in Public and Political Behavior. This move promotes authoritarian narratives and undermines the support systems for marginalized communities by aligning corporate policy with far-right political strategies.

    Meta Shifts Right: Big Tech, Project 2025, & Assault on DEI

  • -70

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 27

    The termination of longstanding DEI and supplier diversity programs represents a severe breach in Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility. These programs historically served not only to increase workforce diversity but also to support economic opportunities for marginalized communities. Their dismantling is seen as a move that prioritizes corporate expediency and political realignment over ethical responsibilities.

    Meta Shifts Right: Big Tech, Project 2025, & Assault on DEI

  • -75

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 27

    Meta’s overhaul of its fact-checking and content moderation policies has negative implications for Technology and Services Impact. The reduction in oversight is likely to contribute to the spread of hate speech and misinformation, thereby undermining the societal responsibility of tech companies to ensure safe digital communications.

    Meta Shifts Right: Big Tech, Project 2025, & Assault on DEI

  • -50

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 27

    The broader economic and structural influence of Meta is impacted by its strategic realignment which includes the abrupt dismantling of programs that bolstered local economies and supported community development. While less directly influential than other dimensions, these structural decisions contribute to a weakening of checks against market abuses and help consolidate power in ways that favor authoritarian governance models.

    Meta Shifts Right: Big Tech, Project 2025, & Assault on DEI

  • Meta’s Policy Shift: Loosening Content Moderation to Favor Right-Wing Interests Logo
    JAN
    12
    2025

    Meta Business Partners, operating under Meta, has been associated with a significant shift in content moderation rules. The company removed its fact-checking system and eased restrictions on hate speech, a move widely seen as an attempt to appease right-wing political interests and incoming President Trump. This change undermines measures against misinformation and paves the way for extremist rhetoric on its platforms.

  • -50

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    Meta’s decision to loosen its content moderation—removing fact-checkers and permitting hate speech—is reflective of a broader strategy to align with far-right political currents. By prioritizing political bias over rigorous oversight, the company fosters an environment that can amplify extremist views and undermine democratic discourse.

    Everything You Need To Know About Meta’s Change in Content Rules

  • -40

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 27

    The removal of traditional fact-checking coupled with the adoption of a crowd-sourced moderation system significantly increases the risk of misinformation and extremist propaganda. This shift, by weakening safeguards against inflammatory content, enhances the role of the platform in propagating divisive and authoritarian narratives.

    Everything You Need To Know About Meta’s Change in Content Rules

  • Meta's Fact-Checking Pullback and Its Global Implications Logo
    JAN
    07
    2025

    On January 7, 2025, Meta announced the closure of its fact-checking program and a rollback of content moderation policies, collaborating with the incoming Trump administration. This policy shift weakens independent verification, increases the spread of divisive content, and may bolster authoritarian narratives globally.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    Meta's decision to roll back its fact-checking program and collaborate with the Trump administration reflects a significant political stance. This move undermines democratic accountability by reducing independent oversight and potentially amplifying divisive, authoritarian-aligned content.

    Analysis: Meta's fact-checking pullback will have global consequences

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 27

    By discontinuing funding for independent fact-checking organizations, Meta demonstrates questionable ethical responsibility. The move prioritizes political expediency over corporate accountability, compromising the integrity of information and social responsibility.

    Analysis: Meta's fact-checking pullback will have global consequences

  • -80

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 27

    The alteration of content moderation policies directly impacts the technological environment by enabling the proliferation of harmful and divisive content. This strategic rollback increases susceptibility to manipulation by authoritarian entities and undermines digital accountability.

    Analysis: Meta's fact-checking pullback will have global consequences

  • -50

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 27

    Although primarily a content moderation decision, Meta's policy change reflects broader economic and structural influences. By leveraging its global platform to shape political narratives, the company indirectly contributes to economic dynamics that favor authoritarian practices.

    Analysis: Meta's fact-checking pullback will have global consequences

  • Meta ends third-party fact-checking partnership, raising concerns over accountability Logo
    JAN
    07
    2025

    Meta Business Partners, as part of Meta, ended its eight-year partnership with independent US fact-checking organizations. Citing a need for greater 'free expression', CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s decision has drawn criticism for potentially reducing accountability and facilitating the spread of misinformation—moves seen by critics as aligning with authoritarian-leaning political interests.

  • -60

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    Meta’s decision to end its fact-checking partnership, reinforced by executive remarks and recent meetings with political figures like Donald Trump, suggests an intentional shift away from independent oversight. This move undermines democratic accountability and transparency by prioritizing unfiltered 'free expression' over accurate information, a step that may embolden authoritarian narratives.

    Meta ending third-party fact-checking partnership with US partners, including PolitiFact

  • -50

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 27

    The discontinuation of the third-party fact-checking initiative directly impacts Meta’s content moderation practices. By removing a layer of independent verification, the decision risks enabling the unchecked spread of misleading information and propaganda, thereby compromising the integrity of the platform’s media environment.

    Meta ending third-party fact-checking partnership with US partners, including PolitiFact

  • Meta shelves fact-checks amid political shift ahead of Trump administration Logo
    JAN
    07
    2025

    Meta has scrapped its U.S. fact-checking program and revised content moderation policies, coinciding with key leadership appointments and a donation to Trump's inaugural fund. Critics argue that these moves reflect an alarming realignment toward authoritarian political interests by prioritizing free expression over accountability.

  • Donation to Trump's 2025 Inaugural Fund Logo
    DEC
    24
    2024

    Meta Business Partners donated $1 million to Donald Trump's 2025 inaugural fund, an action that many view as contributing to the financial backbone of an emerging authoritarian regime. This donation is seen as aligning the company with policies and political figures associated with fascism.

  • -80

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 27

    Meta Business Partners’ decision to donate $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund directly contributes financial support to an organization tied to an authoritarian political agenda. From an anti-fascist perspective, this act reinforces a troubling connection between corporate money and the promotion of policies that can undermine democratic norms. By channeling resources to such causes, the company is seen as complicit in bolstering a regime that many argue is fostering fascist tendencies.

    Amazon To Meta: These Companies Are Donating Huge Amounts To Trump's 2025 Inaugural Fund

  • Meta’s Record-Breaking Lobbying Spend Logo
    MAR
    31
    2024

    Meta Platforms, associated with Meta Business Partners, reported a record lobbying expenditure of $7.6 million in the first quarter of 2024. This spending targeted pivotal legislative issues such as children's online safety, Section 230, and national security, raising concerns about the use of corporate funds to unduly influence policy and democratic processes.

  • -40

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 27

    Meta’s record lobbying spend indicates significant investment in influencing policy, particularly around issues that can compromise democratic accountability and favor corporate interests over public welfare. Such activities are seen as bolstering authoritarian tendencies by enabling corporations to shape legislation in ways that protect their business models at the expense of broader societal interests.

    Meta's Record-Breaking Lobbying Spend - TechStory

  • Meta Political Donations Support Progressive Causes Logo
    NOV
    08
    2022

    The article reports that Meta, including its affiliates, contributed $1.57 million during the 2022 election cycle, with 78% of funds directed to Democratic candidates. This donation pattern is seen as bolstering progressive politics against authoritarian influences.

  • +70

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 27

    Based on the article, Meta and its affiliates have donated $1.57 million during the 2022 election cycle, with 78% of those donations going to Democratic candidates. From an anti-fascist perspective, this generous support for progressive candidates helps counter authoritarian tendencies. While corporate political donations often raise concerns over transparency and influence, in this instance the contributions are viewed as a positive force supporting democratic processes.

    Who Does Meta Give Political Donations To? - Yahoo Finance

  • Meta bans surveillance-for-hire firms for targeting users Logo
    DEC
    16
    2021

    Meta has taken a decisive step against authoritarian surveillance by banning seven surveillance-for-hire firms that targeted users across its platforms. The move, aimed at protecting individuals including journalists and human rights activists, signals a strong corporate stance against repressive technologies.

  • +80

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    Meta's action to ban surveillance-for-hire firms showcases a proactive commitment to upholding democratic values and protecting users from targeted repression. This policy serves as a clear public demonstration of ethical and political responsibility.

    Meta bans surveillance-for-hire firms for targeting users - BBC

  • +80

    Provision of Repressive Technologies

    March 27

    By actively distancing itself from firms that provide repressive surveillance technology, Meta contributes to a broader societal push against authoritarian practices. This move underlines the company's commitment to refusing complicity in technologies that enable state or private repression.

    Meta bans surveillance-for-hire firms for targeting users - BBC

Industries

541511
Custom Computer Programming Services
541512
Computer Systems Design Services
541519
Other Computer Related Services
541613
Marketing Consulting Services
541930
Translation and Interpretation Services