The article highlights economic maneuvers such as the protection of tax subsidies and the use of MSG as a political prop, suggesting that corporate strategies are being used to sustain and profit from an authoritarian-friendly status quo. This contributes to broader systemic issues such as regulatory capture and economic collaboration with policies that undermine democratic accountability.

Trump’s Rally Was a Desecration of Madison Square Garden

The company’s use of facial recognition technology, particularly its practice of denying entry to individuals involved in litigation, has sparked controversy. This use of potentially repressive technology raises concerns about the infringement of civil liberties and supports narratives of corporate overreach.

Madison Square Garden PAC Funds Council Members Who’ll Vote on Arena’s Future

MSG's deployment of facial recognition technology, as reported in the article, is used to exclude certain individuals—specifically lawyers involved in litigation against MSG Entertainment—from entering its venues. This exclusionary practice uses advanced surveillance tools in a manner that risks reinforcing authoritarian dynamics and infringes on civil liberties. The use of such repressive technology raises serious concerns over privacy, potential racial bias, and the broader implications for a surveillance state.

Madison Square Garden's facial recognition blacklisting sparks outcry

Madison Square Garden's use of facial recognition technology to enforce a policy that bars lawyers—particularly those involved in litigation against the company—from entering its venues raises significant concerns about the deployment of repressive technologies. Such measures can be viewed as a means to deter legal challenges and suppress accountability, aligning with practices that are complicit in authoritarian and fascist strategies. The repressive application of technology in denying access to legal advocates undermines principles of fairness and transparency.

Madison Square Garden uses face recognition to keep out enemy lawyers. That may be illegal.

MSG Entertainment's deployment of facial recognition technology is criticized for its invasive nature and potential for racial and gender bias. Its use to exclude individuals—such as barring attorneys involved in litigation—sets a dangerous precedent for surveillance and repressive control. This application of technology not only undermines privacy but also reflects broader authoritarian impulses by enabling discriminatory practices.

Madison Square Garden's facial recognition policy ignites debate