Company Directory - International Olympic Committee
Company Details - International Olympic Committee
International Olympic Committee
WebsiteInternational Olympic Committee is an international organization responsible for overseeing the Olympic Games. It is not a traditional company but a non-governmental sports organization that governs the Olympic Movement.
CCI Score
CCI Score: International Olympic Committee
-32.97
0.02%
Latest Event
IOC Neglects Athlete Labor Rights in Presidential Campaigns
A Human Rights Watch report criticizes the IOC for its long-standing neglect in recognizing athletes' rights as workers to organize and collectively bargain. The piece also highlights how presidential candidates have failed to adequately address human rights and governance, reflecting broader issues in the organization's political engagement and labor practices.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
International Olympic Committee is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- FEB262025
A Human Rights Watch report criticizes the IOC for its long-standing neglect in recognizing athletes' rights as workers to organize and collectively bargain. The piece also highlights how presidential candidates have failed to adequately address human rights and governance, reflecting broader issues in the organization's political engagement and labor practices.
-40
Executive Political Engagement
March 21
The report reveals that IOC presidential candidates have largely omitted robust commitments to human rights and democratic governance. This omission suggests a troubling executive political disengagement, as the leadership fails to prioritize essential rights for athletes and other stakeholders, thereby undermining democratic accountability in sports governance.
-50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 21
The IOC has been criticized for its persistent failure to recognize and protect athletes’ rights as workers, including the rights to unionize and engage in collective bargaining. This neglect not only jeopardizes fair labor standards in international sports but also reinforces structures that marginalize athlete voices in decision-making processes.
- SEP182024
A detailed analysis of the IOC's historical and ongoing practices that have facilitated sportswashing, provided platforms for authoritarian regimes, and resulted in significant human rights violations despite recent anti-corruption reforms.
- SEP162024
The article details how the IOC handled political controversies during the Paris 2024 Games, including suspending Russian teams while allowing neutrals and showing selective enforcement of the Olympic Truce. Such decisions have raised concerns about double standards and potential complicity with authoritarian influences.
-20
Public and Political Behavior
March 21
The IOC's decisions—suspending Russian competitors for invasion while allowing neutral participation, and its inconsistent application of the Olympic Truce—reflect a politically compromised stance. Such selective actions raise questions about the organization's commitment to neutrality and its potential complicity in reinforcing authoritarian influence, as these actions may indirectly serve the agendas of powerful state actors.
- FEB012022
The IOC has remained silent on human rights abuses in China, notably cutting off discussions regarding forced labor in Olympic uniform supply chains. This inaction appears designed to maintain close ties with authoritarian regimes to secure its primary revenue driver, despite its stated commitment to human rights.
-60
Executive Political Engagement
March 21
The IOC's refusal to denounce or even acknowledge human rights abuses in China, particularly regarding forced labor in its Olympic uniform supply chains, reflects a problematic executive political engagement. By maintaining a stance of neutrality while indirectly aligning with authoritarian regimes for revenue reasons, the organization undermines its professed commitment to human rights.
-75
Supply Chain Ethics
March 21
The IOC's decision to cut off talks with human rights organizations over potential forced labor issues in its Olympic uniform supply chain highlights severe shortcomings in supply chain ethics. This move seems designed to protect financial interests rather than address critical human rights concerns, thereby implicitly supporting authoritarian practices.
- MAR252021
Foreign Affairs analysis critiques the IOC for hosting events in authoritarian regimes, effectively enabling propaganda and economic collaboration with oppressive governments.
-30
Public and Political Behavior
March 21
The IOC’s decision to continue awarding and hosting the Olympic Games in nations with authoritarian regimes lends unintentional legitimacy to these governments. This neutrality, or lack of proactive stance in the face of human rights concerns, effectively supports a political narrative favored by authoritarian leaders.
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
March 21
By awarding Olympic Games to host cities in authoritarian regimes, the IOC becomes complicit in economic collaborations that indirectly finance and enhance oppressive governments. The decision undermines efforts to challenge regimes that employ the Olympics as a propaganda tool, further entrenching authoritarian practices.
Alternatives
Washington, D.C., USA
0.00
Corporation
16.84
Brentford, England
76.81
San Diego, United States
34.43
Toronto, Canada
11.44
Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
8.95
Seoul, South Korea
0.00
Charlotte, United States
-4.40
New York City, United States
-7.33
Denver, United States
-8.06
Industries
- 711211
- Sports Teams and Clubs
- 711219
- Other Spectator Sports
- 813920
- Professional Organizations