Company Directory - Hoover Institution
Company Details - Hoover Institution

Hoover Institution
WebsiteThe Hoover Institution is a public policy think tank and research institution that focuses on domestic and international issues, providing insightful analysis and recommendations for public policy.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Hoover Institution
24.37
-0.01%
Latest Event
Hoover Institution Hosts Conference on Digital Authoritarianism
The Hoover Institution cohosted a virtual conference examining how China's advancements in AI and other emerging technologies are used to enhance authoritarian governance. The event featured prominent speakers including Condoleezza Rice, Eric Schmidt, and others, who debated the implications of authoritarian practices in technology and stressed the importance of democratic oversight and ethical technological innovation.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
SABOTEUR
Hoover Institution is currently rated as a Saboteur.
Latest Events
- SEP292023
The Hoover Institution cohosted a virtual conference examining how China's advancements in AI and other emerging technologies are used to enhance authoritarian governance. The event featured prominent speakers including Condoleezza Rice, Eric Schmidt, and others, who debated the implications of authoritarian practices in technology and stressed the importance of democratic oversight and ethical technological innovation.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 9
By cohosting a conference that critically examines China's use of advanced technologies to promote authoritarian governance, the Hoover Institution steps into the public political arena to advocate for democratic values and resist authoritarian practices. This public engagement signals robust opposition to authoritarianism through open dialogue and policy discussion.
Hoover Copresents Conference On How China Uses Technology To Support Authoritarian Ambitions
+60
Technology and Services Impact
April 9
The conference spotlighted the use of emerging technologies like AI, machine learning, and facial recognition in the service of authoritarian surveillance and repression. By fostering discussions on ethical technology use and countering repressive practices, Hoover Institution demonstrates a commitment to challenging the misuse of technology by authoritarian regimes.
Hoover Copresents Conference On How China Uses Technology To Support Authoritarian Ambitions
- JUN122009
The Hoover Institution published a detailed research article arguing that the United States should implement strict policies to prevent its technology from being used by repressive regimes to censor content and surveil citizens. The piece highlights how authoritarian governments exploit digital tools to suppress dissent and calls for coordinated international export controls on censorship and surveillance technologies.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
April 9
By publishing research that advocates for policies to restrict the use of U.S. technology by authoritarian regimes, the Hoover Institution takes a stand against digital repression. This public and political engagement promotes measures that safeguard digital freedoms and oppose authoritarian practices, warranting a positive score under the Public and Political Behavior category.
- MAR181997
The Hoover Institution released an in‐depth analysis titled 'Political Money: The New Prohibition' that critiques current campaign finance restrictions and argues for abolishing expenditure and contribution limits. The article contends that these limitations stifle free political speech and penalize challengers while favoring the wealthy and powerful, positions that from a left‑leaning, anti‑fascist perspective may inadvertently strengthen oligarchic and authoritarian influences in politics.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
April 9
By promoting the deregulation of campaign finance, the institution’s analysis supports a framework that could enable excessive political spending by wealthy individuals. This stance is seen as contributing to disproportionate influence in political processes, potentially undermining democratic accountability and creating conditions favorable to authoritarian practices.
-20
Economic and Structural Influence
April 9
The deregulation stance endorsed in the publication may exacerbate economic and structural inequalities by permitting unlimited spending by affluent candidates. This unequal financial influence is conducive to entrenching power among elites, a dynamic that undermines fair political competition and promotes authoritarian practices.
Alternatives

Washington, D.C., United States
70.00

Stockholm, Sweden
63.14

Washington, D.C., United States
60.08

New York, United States
50.41
New York, USA
42.35

East Lansing, United States
8.66
Corporation
55.29

Corporation
49.13

Deerfield, United States
83.43

Canada
78.31
Industries
- 541720
- Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
- 611310
- Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
- 813312
- Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations