Harvard Review

Website

Harvard Review is a literary magazine known for publishing essays, fiction, poetry, and criticism. The magazine has also faced controversy, including allegations of censoring Palestinian writers. It serves as a platform for diverse literary voices and critical commentary.

CCI Score

-55.40

0.23% May 31

Latest Event

Censorship Controversy: Blocking Palestinian Legal Scholar

Harvard Law Review, associated with Harvard Review, faced internal turmoil after a majority vote blocked publication of a piece by Palestinian legal scholar Rabea Eghbariah. The decision sparked accusations of censorship and suppression of Palestinian voices, raising concerns about the institution's role in stifling critical discourse and reinforcing exclusionary practices.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives SEE ALL: The Atlantic

TNR

New Yorker
Use Your Voice OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score SUPPORT CCI

QUISLING

Harvard Review is currently rated as a Quisling.

-44 to -59 CCI Score

These companies are fully aligned with authoritarian regimes. They not only support but also enforce oppressive policies, playing a significant role in the regime’s operational apparatus and contributing directly to its consolidation of power.

Latest Events

DEC

11

2023

Censorship Controversy: Blocking Palestinian Legal Scholar
-65.13

Harvard Law Review, associated with Harvard Review, faced internal turmoil after a majority vote blocked publication of a piece by Palestinian legal scholar Rabea Eghbariah. The decision sparked accusations of censorship and suppression of Palestinian voices, raising concerns about the institution's role in stifling critical discourse and reinforcing exclusionary practices.
-80

Public and Political Behavior

March 22

The decision to block the publication of a piece by a Palestinian legal scholar undermines free academic discourse and public debate. This action reflects an abandonment of transparency and a concerning alignment with authoritarian tendencies, as it silences marginalized voices and restricts critical perspectives on issues related to human rights and state power.

Harvard Law Review Faces Internal Turmoil After Vote to Block Piece by Palestinian Scholar
-70

Media Influence and Propaganda

March 22

The editorial decision to censor the Palestinian scholar's work adversely affects the media's role in ensuring free exchange of ideas and critical perspectives. By suppressing this piece, the review contributes to a biased narrative and diminishes its accountability in promoting open, inclusive discourse, which can indirectly support authoritarian practices.

Harvard Law Review Faces Internal Turmoil After Vote to Block Piece by Palestinian Scholar
NOV

22

2023

Censorship Controversy Over Palestinian Genocide Coverage
-56.20

Harvard Review, known for its publishing controversies including alleged censorship of Palestinian writers, is linked to a recent incident where the Harvard Law Review refused to publish a piece on the unfolding genocide in Gaza. This decision reflects broader issues of suppressing dissent and controlling narratives.
-70

Public and Political Behavior

March 22

The decision to cancel the publication of a critical piece about the Gaza genocide indicates a suppression of essential public discourse, aligning with authoritarian practices that undermine democratic debate. This reflects poorly on the company’s commitment to free expression and transparency in political matters.

The “Harvard Law Review” Refused to Run This Piece About Genocide in Gaza
-60

Media Influence and Propaganda

March 22

The cancellation of a piece that critically examines the situation in Gaza demonstrates an effort to control and shape media narratives. By silencing dissenting voices, the editorial decision contributes to an environment where authoritarian perspectives can go unchallenged, indirectly supporting oppressive regimes.

The “Harvard Law Review” Refused to Run This Piece About Genocide in Gaza
NOV

22

2023

Censorship Allegations at Harvard Law Review
-42.14

Harvard Law Review, closely tied to the Harvard community, has been accused of censoring a pro-Palestinian article alleging genocide in Gaza. The decision, reportedly driven by fears of backlash and potential doxxing of editors, is seen as compromising academic freedom and suppressing vital dissenting viewpoints.
-40

Public and Political Behavior

March 22

The decision by the Harvard Law Review editors to suppress an article alleging genocide in Gaza reflects a troubling stance in public and political behavior. This censorship, motivated by concerns over editor safety and backlash rather than a commitment to open debate, undermines democratic discourse and perpetuates an environment where elite protection takes precedence over accountability.

Harvard journal accused of censoring article alleging genocide in Gaza
-60

Media Influence and Propaganda

March 22

The incident also highlights serious issues in media influence and propaganda. By rejecting a critical article on genocidal practices, the publication has engaged in a form of censorship that curtails essential debate and critical analysis, effectively aligning with authoritarian tendencies that silence dissenting voices.

Harvard journal accused of censoring article alleging genocide in Gaza
NOV

21

2023

Harvard Law Review Censors Pro-Palestinian Essay
-58.13

An emergency internal decision by the Harvard Law Review to block a Palestinian scholar's essay on Gaza has raised serious concerns regarding censorship, academic freedom, and ethical responsibility. This incident reflects a broader pattern of silencing marginalized voices, aligning with allegations previously faced by Harvard Review regarding suppression of Palestinian writers.
-70

Public and Political Behavior

March 22

The decision to block the essay, despite it following standard editorial procedures, demonstrates a worrying trend of suppressing dissenting and pro-Palestinian viewpoints. This incident reflects a broader willingness to engage in censorship that undermines democratic discourse and academic freedom, which is a key aspect of Public and Political Behavior.

Harvard Law Review Blocks Article About Genocide in Gaza
-65

Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

March 22

By cancelling the publication of a rigorously vetted and academically significant essay, the editorial team compromised ethical responsibility and transparency. This action undermines core values related to diversity, free speech, and fair business practices expected from reputable publishing entities, particularly those with a history of allegations regarding the censorship of Palestinian voices.

Harvard Law Review Blocks Article About Genocide in Gaza