General Mills has been reported to contribute $129,500 through its PAC to federal candidates during the 2023-2024 election cycle. From an anti-fascist perspective, such political contributions are viewed as a means for corporations to exert undue influence on the democratic process, potentially supporting policies that undermine grassroots representation and entrench authoritarian practices. This financial influence is seen as complicity in fostering a political environment where corporate interests may override public welfare.

General Mills’ PAC contribution of $129,500 to federal candidates indicates a significant engagement in political funding. From an anti-fascist perspective, such corporate contributions are worrisome as they can skew political influence in favor of candidates who may adopt authoritarian policies. This use of corporate funds undermines democratic accountability by potentially shaping electoral outcomes to favor narrow corporate interests.

General Mills PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates • OpenSecrets

General Mills continues to engage in political donations through its PAC, contributing to political causes even as overall donations in the sector have declined. While the company emphasizes transparency and accountability, the practice of using corporate funds to influence political processes is seen as potentially undermining democratic accountability and facilitating corporate complicity in authoritarian practices.

Political donations from 15 of the largest US food and beverage makers plunge

The federal lawsuit alleges severe and prolonged racial discrimination at General Mills' Georgia plant. Multiple incidents—including demotions, racial slurs, and retaliatory practices—point to systemic failures in upholding basic labor rights and human dignity, signaling a deep complicity in ignoring racism. This represents a significant violation under 'Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices' within Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility, reflecting a negative impact and contribution to broader oppressive corporate behavior.

General Mills turned blind eye to decades of racism at Georgia plant, Black workers allege

General Mills has expanded its lobbying efforts by significantly increasing its spending and doubling the number of lobbyists in Washington, D.C. This move, aimed at influencing food and agriculture policy during a critical period of legislative review, underscores the company’s growing role in shaping government policy. From an anti-fascist perspective, such actions can be seen as bolstering corporate influence over democratic processes, thereby contributing to systemic challenges to democratic accountability.

General Mills boosts D.C. lobbying presence as Congress reviews food policy

The article highlights that General Mills has boosted its D.C. lobbying presence by significantly increasing its expenditures and hiring additional lobbyists, many of whom have deep political ties. This aggressive expansion of corporate political influence is concerning from an anti-fascist perspective as it may contribute to policies that favor corporate interests over the public good and potentially enable authoritarian practices.

General Mills boosts D.C. lobbying presence as Congress reviews food policy

General Mills' expenditure of $790,000 on lobbying in 2021 indicates a significant investment in political influence. From an anti-fascist perspective, such use of corporate funds can be seen as a method to sway policy decisions in ways that may compromise democratic oversight and facilitate the empowerment of authoritarian interests.

General Mills Issues Lobbied • OpenSecrets

General Mills, through its political action committee, has taken a strong and positive stance by withdrawing political contributions to lawmakers who opposed certifying the presidential election results. This action demonstrates a commitment to upholding democratic norms and distancing the company from any support of efforts perceived as undermining electoral integrity. Such actions are aligned with anti-fascist values that resist authoritarian methods.

General Mills withdraws support from those who voted against certifying election