The legislative debate, as covered in the article, raises serious concerns about GB Energy's supply chain ethics. The amendment specifically targets the use of slave labor in the sourcing of solar panels, highlighting potential modern slavery and forced labor in the supply chain. This represents significant ethical and human rights issues, marking a substantial negative impact on the company's practices.

Amendment on the Use of Slave Labour In Supply Chains Providing Solar Panels and Other Forms of Green Energy Passed in The Lords by A Majority of 50 – David Alton

GB Energy is implicated in the controversy for potentially procuring solar panel components from sources linked to forced labour practices in Xinjiang. This suggests a serious failure in supply chain ethics, as public funds might support operations with modern slavery ties. The legislative push to block such investments underscores the urgency to address these ethical breaches and protect human rights.

Labour facing defeat in vote to ban green energy investments tied to Uyghur exploitation

The article raises urgent concerns about GB Energy's supply chain ethics, noting that the government bill lacks provisions to ensure ethical sourcing. This omission may facilitate the continued use of forced labor in the production of solar panels, undermining human rights and ethical procurement practices.

GB Energy is at Risk of Relying on Slavery Briefing