Fusion GPS, known for commissioning the Steele dossier during the 2016 election cycle, is once again thrust into the political spotlight as President Trump orders the FBI to declassify documents related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. The dossier, which has fueled intense partisan debates, highlights the firm's deep engagement in politically charged intelligence gathering — an involvement that raises questions about political manipulation and oversight in an era of heightened authoritarian tendencies.

An analysis of Fusion GPS's involvement in producing the Trump dossier, highlighting its simultaneous work for the Clinton campaign, DNC, and Kremlin-linked entities. The firm's conduct raises serious concerns about its influence on political narratives and its ethical business practices, with potential implications for democratic processes.

A federal judge ruled that Fusion GPS must hand over 22 internal emails related to its efforts to plant news coverage regarding alleged ties between Donald Trump and Russia. The emails reveal that the firm, hired by the Clinton campaign for opposition research, engaged in proactive media relations that some argue crossed typical attorney-client boundaries.

Fusion GPS, a political consulting and research firm, played a central role in producing the controversial dossier concerning Trump’s connections to Russia. Hired by both conservative and Democratic entities, the firm's intelligence work has sparked debate over its impact on political discourse and accountability. From an anti-fascist perspective, their investigative efforts are seen as a contribution to exposing authoritarian abuses of power, even though the dossier’s unverified claims have raised concerns about the methods used and potential unintended consequences.

Fusion GPS, a political consulting and research firm, has significantly influenced U.S. political discourse through its production of opposition research, notably the Steele dossier. Its work has spurred multiple Congressional investigations focused on potential abuses of power and unregistered foreign influence. While its investigations have helped expose questionable links and hold political actors accountable, controversies over ethical boundaries and unregistered lobbying have also provoked scrutiny.

Fusion GPS, a political consulting firm known for its role in producing the Steele dossier, is facing scrutiny over alleged failures to register as a lobbyist under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. This controversy raises concerns about the firm's political consulting practices and potential complicity in bolstering authoritarian influences by engaging with foreign interests.

Fusion GPS, known for commissioning the controversial Steele dossier during the 2016 US election cycle, played a key role in producing intelligence that contributed to scrutiny of potential abuses of power. Although the dossier has faced criticism over its veracity, from an anti-fascist perspective its production represents an attempt to expose authoritarian inclinations and enable political accountability.