Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Department of Government Efficiency

Company Details - Department of Government Efficiency

Department of Government Efficiency

An entity involved in the management and efficiency of government operations, focused on reducing costs and improving services.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Department of Government Efficiency

-44.76

1.37%

Latest Event

Department of Government Efficiency Endorsed in Army Efficiency Drive

During an interview, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll credited various forces, including the Department of Government Efficiency, for enabling efforts to cut waste and reform Army acquisitions—a move intertwined with praise for the Trump administration and conservative figures.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL
Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

Department of Government Efficiency is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score
Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

  • APR
    19
    2025

    During an interview, Army Secretary Dan Driscoll credited various forces, including the Department of Government Efficiency, for enabling efforts to cut waste and reform Army acquisitions—a move intertwined with praise for the Trump administration and conservative figures.

  • APR
    14
    2025

    Democratic senators have raised alarm over reported plans to downsize the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Chief Investment Officer. The agency is reported to be replacing unionized workers with non‐union personnel from the Department of Government Efficiency, a move seen as aligning with executive policies that undermine collective bargaining and public service accountability.

  • APR
    08
    2025

    More than 1,200 'Hands Off!' rallies across the U.S. targeted the Department of Government Efficiency’s federal downsizing initiative—a key Trump administration policy. Protesters decried the move, arguing it undermines job security and public services, and contributes to an authoritarian style of governance harmful to workers and marginalized communities.

  • APR
    03
    2025

    The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) uncovered that the VA had been paying approximately $380K per month for minor website modifications; the contract was subsequently canceled and the work shifted to an internal VA engineer, illustrating a move towards government cost-cutting and increased accountability.

  • MAR
    31
    2025

    The Department of Government Efficiency, nicknamed DOGE, faced sharp criticism after its initiative to gain access to sensitive government systems such as the Treasury Department, even as it received backing from President Donald Trump. This controversial move, highlighted during a town hall in Green Bay, raises concerns about potential authoritarian overreach.

  • MAR
    31
    2025

    GOP Rep. Ron Estes defended the Department of Government Efficiency's effort to eliminate government waste, countering claims that the initiative was intended to cut Social Security benefits to favor tax breaks for billionaires. The rep argued that saving dollars from waste ensures legitimate benefits for Social Security recipients.

  • MAR
    31
    2025

    A court filing alleges that an official allied with Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency has been installed to lead the U.S. Institute of Peace amidst a mass firing of employees and abrupt property transfer orders, raising concerns about undermining democratic norms and workers' rights.

  • MAR
    28
    2025

    The article mentions that as part of efforts to reduce the size of the federal government, the Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency is backing cuts to the Department of Veterans Affairs, a move that threatens essential services for veterans.

  • MAR
    28
    2025

    A federal judge declined to block the Department of Government Efficiency's takeover of the U.S. Institute of Peace, leading to the immediate termination of many USIP staff. The move is seen as part of a broader political effort aligned with the Trump administration to dismantle independent institutions.

  • MAR
    25
    2025

    The Department of Government Efficiency, acting in coordination with political allies, initiated early actions to downsize the Social Security Administration, a move that has raised alarms among Senate Democrats over potential erosion of vital social safety nets and public services.

  • MAR
    18
    2025

    A federal judge halted Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from dismantling USAID, ruling the action violated constitutional principles and demonstrated an authoritarian overreach in government operations.

  • MAR
    15
    2025

    A federal cybersecurity specialist has alleged that staff from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) manipulated cybersecurity protocols at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), including disabling multi-factor authentication and internal alert systems, resulting in the unauthorized transfer of sensitive data. The allegations arise amid an executive order from President Trump aimed at consolidating federal data access, raising concerns over potential politically motivated misuse of technology and negligence in ethical business practices.

  • MAR
    07
    2025

    Elon Musk's appointment as head of the Department of Government Efficiency has come under legal and ethical scrutiny, raising concerns over constitutional violations, conflicts of interest, and potential misuse of power to benefit private enterprises.

  • -80

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 25

    Musk's appointment raises serious constitutional and governance concerns, undermining transparency and the Senate confirmation process. His leadership of a government agency by political appointment reflects troubling patterns of executive overreach and authoritarian leanings.

    Elon Musk's Role in Government Efficiency Department Faces Legal and Ethical Scrutiny

  • -70

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    The appointment demonstrates significant conflicts of interest, where Musk’s private business ventures could benefit from his government role, thereby compromising ethical responsibilities and fair governance.

    Elon Musk's Role in Government Efficiency Department Faces Legal and Ethical Scrutiny

  • -60

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 25

    Controversies over cost-cutting measures and the potential exaggeration of wasteful spending suggest economic manipulation that may structurally undermine public accountability and benefit private interests over the public good.

    Elon Musk's Role in Government Efficiency Department Faces Legal and Ethical Scrutiny

  • MAR
    07
    2025

    The Department of Government Efficiency abruptly canceled leases on key government buildings without proper notification to elected officials, raising concerns over transparency and democratic accountability.

  • -30

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 25

    The agency’s decision to cancel multiple leases for government offices without timely communication has left elected officials uninformed and undermines transparency in public operations. This lack of accountability is concerning from a democratic oversight perspective, potentially aligning with authoritarian administrative practices by sidelining public discourse and engagement.

    DOGE cuts in Columbus: elected officials left in the dark

  • FEB
    28
    2025

    DOGE, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, has come under intense legal scrutiny for operating without proper legislative authorization. Created via an overreaching executive order, the venture bypasses established democratic processes, lacks transparency, and appears to engage in covert lobbying, thereby undermining public accountability and contributing to authoritarian practices.

  • -80

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 25

    DOGE operates without legitimate governmental authority, having been created solely by an executive order without the necessary legislative or judicial backing. This undermines democratic norms and transparency, reflecting a clear instance of corporate interference in public governance and supporting authoritarian practices.

    Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency faces legal scrutiny

  • -70

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 25

    Reports indicate that DOGE is engaging in clandestine lobbying activities by making backdoor policy recommendations and seeking informal meetings with government agencies. Such actions not only skirt transparency requirements but also potentially violate lobbying laws, thereby facilitating undue influence over public policy in favor of authoritarian objectives.

    Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency faces legal scrutiny

  • FEB
    21
    2025

    The article details how Elon Musk’s so-called DOGE organization, tied to the Department of Government Efficiency, is involved in infiltrating federal agencies through surveillance technology and unethical practices amid political purges under the Trump administration.

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    The organization's involvement in unauthorized surveillance and potential retaliation against union activities highlights unethical business practices that disregard worker rights and transparency.

    DOGE Sparks Surveillance Fear Across the US Government

  • -90

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 25

    The deployment of surveillance and monitoring technologies by the company contributes to a culture of repression. The use of such tools in sensitive government environments poses severe risks to privacy and democratic freedoms.

    DOGE Sparks Surveillance Fear Across the US Government

  • -50

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 25

    The infiltration of sensitive government agencies and access to critical personnel data by the organization reflects a disturbing level of economic and structural influence that bolsters authoritarian restructuring efforts.

    DOGE Sparks Surveillance Fear Across the US Government

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 25

    The company is associated with actions that facilitate state surveillance and employee purges in government agencies, contributing to an environment that supports authoritarian policies and undermines democratic accountability.

    DOGE Sparks Surveillance Fear Across the US Government

  • FEB
    08
    2025

    A ProPublica investigation reveals that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is operating under the guise of a federal agency, receiving nearly $40 million through reallocated funds and shielding its records from public scrutiny. Endorsed by figures like Trump and Musk, DOGE’s actions raise serious concerns over its role in undermining democratic accountability and enabling authoritarian practices.

  • -80

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 25

    The department’s tactics strongly reflect politically motivated actions endorsed by Trump and Musk. By circumventing standard federal norms, such as open records requests and proper oversight, DOGE is operating in a manner that fosters authoritarian control and undermines democratic institutions.

    How Is the Trump Administration Funding DOGE? — ProPublica

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    The appropriation and use of funds via the Economy Act without clear legislative backing, combined with the refusal to comply with FOIA requests, point to deeply unethical practices. These actions reflect a misuse of public resources, raising major concerns about ethical responsibility and transparency.

    How Is the Trump Administration Funding DOGE? — ProPublica

  • -70

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 25

    By manipulating and reallocating funds from established federal agencies to serve its own agenda, DOGE demonstrates an economic strategy that undermines structural integrity and regulatory oversight. This practice not only questions the legitimacy of its authority but also signals a broader collaboration with authoritarian policies.

    How Is the Trump Administration Funding DOGE? — ProPublica

  • JAN
    15
    2025

    An analysis of the deployed members of the DOGE agency as reported in GovExec, highlighting issues of transparency, accountability, and potential conflicts of interest in government efficiency operations.

  • -50

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 25

    The report raises significant concerns regarding political influence and a lack of clear oversight. The deployment of DOGE agency staff, coupled with opaque reporting structures and potential conflicts of interest involving political figures and influential business leaders, exemplifies behavior that undermines democratic accountability.

    DOGE agency deployments raise ethical and influence concerns

  • -40

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 25

    The article highlights problematic business practices such as the ambiguous employment status of DOGE staff and the unclear chain-of-command, which create significant ethical concerns. This environment can facilitate conflicts of interest and undermines accountability in efforts to cut costs and regulations.

    DOGE agency deployments raise ethical and influence concerns

  • -30

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 25

    The initiative's plans to restructure federal agencies by deploying staff to cut spending and reduce workforces indicate a significant manipulation of government structures. This strategy may lead to constitutional challenges and sets a precedent for undermining democratic norms.

    DOGE agency deployments raise ethical and influence concerns

  • OCT
    23
    2024

    A recent study outlines effective practices to combat forced labor in global supply chains, emphasizing the importance of audits, transparency, and human rights due diligence. The recommendations serve as a guide for improving ethical sourcing and supply chain integrity.

  • +70

    Supply Chain Ethics

    March 25

    The study provides detailed insights into best practices for eliminating forced labor in supply chains, highlighting measures like mandatory audits, human rights impact assessments, and the enforcement of modern slavery laws. These recommendations underline a strong commitment to ethical supply chain practices, reflecting positively on efforts to combat systemic human rights abuses typically linked to authoritarian exploitation.

    Study reveals key practices to combat forced labor within supply chains

Industries

921120
Legislative Bodies
921130
Public Finance Activities
921190
Other General Government Support