Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Defense Companies

Company Details - Defense Companies

Defense Companies Logo

Defense Companies

A group of U.S. defense companies engaged in manufacturing and supplying military weapons and technology, involved in arms package sales, including agreements with countries such as Saudi Arabia.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Defense Companies

-40.88

0.14%

Latest Event

US-Saudi Arms Package Deal Involving Defense Companies

On May 13, 2025, during US President Donald Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia, a deal was announced that includes an arms package valued at nearly $142bn. The agreement involves multiple US defense companies supplying military weapons and technology to Saudi Arabia, linking them directly to an authoritarian regime.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

Defense Companies is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score
Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

  • US-Saudi Arms Package Deal Involving Defense Companies Logo
    MAY
    13
    2025

    On May 13, 2025, during US President Donald Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia, a deal was announced that includes an arms package valued at nearly $142bn. The agreement involves multiple US defense companies supplying military weapons and technology to Saudi Arabia, linking them directly to an authoritarian regime.

  • US Government Urges Defense Companies to Back Democracy Logo
    JUL
    09
    2024

    During a defense industry conference alongside the NATO summit, Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks and other officials called on defense companies to align their business practices with democratic values and support long-term defense commitments, emphasizing the importance of robust private-sector engagement in safeguarding democratic alliances against authoritarian regimes.

  • +40

    Public and Political Behavior

    May 13

    The event reflects a significant governmental push for defense companies to adopt and support democratic values and practices, promoting pro-democracy engagement and countering authoritarian influences. This public and political behavior demonstrates an alignment with anti-fascist and pro-democratic principles.

    US urges defense companies to back democracy

  • Defense Companies’ Continued Lobbying and Militarism Logo
    NOV
    22
    2023

    The article highlights how major US defense companies remain deeply entrenched in a permanent war economy through decades of successful lobbying and securing lucrative Pentagon contracts, despite union efforts advocating for conversion to peace-focused industries. This continued reliance on militarism and resistance to anti-war labor initiatives underlines corporate complicity in perpetuating an authoritarian military-industrial complex.

  • -70

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    May 13

    Defense Companies, as part of the US arms industry, have long used their political contributions and lobbying efforts to secure lucrative Pentagon contracts, reinforcing the war machine and undermining efforts to redirect funds towards civilian and green initiatives. This activity aligns with authoritarian practices that prioritize militarism over worker and community well-being.

    The Problem of the Unionized War Machine

  • -50

    Economic Collaboration

    May 13

    The article indicates that the defense industry's consolidation and economic strategies, including leveraging monopoly power to channel subsidized military aid (e.g., the large annual military aid to Israel), perpetuate a structure that disincentivizes conversion to peaceful economic models. This reflects a significant economic collaboration with policies underpinning permanent militarization, adversely affecting workers and marginalized communities.

    The Problem of the Unionized War Machine

  • Defense Companies Lobbying for Foreign Influence in US Defense Policy Logo
    OCT
    01
    2023

    An investigation by OpenSecrets reveals that major US defense companies are channeling millions into lobbying efforts aimed at influencing the US defense budget and policy in favor of arms sales to foreign nations, raising concerns over the ethical implications of aligning with authoritarian interests.

  • -70

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    May 13

    The report highlights significant lobbying expenditures by defense companies, including activities that target foreign policy outcomes. This use of money to influence policy is seen as contributing to the militarization and support of authoritarian regimes, which falls under the category of political contributions and lobbying efforts with negative implications.

    Capitalizing on Conflict

  • Defense Contractors' $70M Lobbying Effort Logo
    JUN
    30
    2023

    In the first half of 2023, defense contractors, including those represented by Defense Companies, spent nearly $70 million lobbying the federal government ahead of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act. The lobbying focused on issues such as the procurement of F-35 aircraft and other defense-related contracts, reflecting a strong effort to shape U.S. defense policy in favor of increased military spending.

  • -80

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    May 13

    The reported nearly $70 million in lobbying expenditure by defense contractors illustrates a concerted effort to influence defense policy and procurement decisions. This level of political spending tends to favor militaristic and potentially authoritarian agendas by prioritizing defense industry interests over democratic consensus and public accountability, aligning with concerns of corporate complicity in authoritarian practices.

    Defense contractors spent $70 million lobbying ahead of annual defense budget bill

  • Anti-Union Practices Undermine Labor Rights at Defense Contractors Logo
    JUN
    15
    2023

    The article documents a long-term decline in union strength at major defense contractors. It details how companies, including historically significant ones like Lockheed and Pratt & Whitney, have repeatedly engaged in anti-union practices such as aggressive outsourcing, subcontracting, and labor de-unionization tactics. These measures have eroded collective bargaining power and deteriorated workers’ rights over several decades.

  • -70

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    May 13

    The article highlights persistent anti-union strategies by defense contractors which directly undermine fair labor practices and worker rights. Aggressive outsourcing and deskilling practices are shown to weaken union power, reflecting a negative impact on the ethical treatment of workers in the defense industry.

    Union Strength Dwindles at Top Defense Contractors

  • US Government Enforces Forced Labor Supply Chain Due Diligence Logo
    JUN
    09
    2023

    New US government regulatory actions, including an interim DFARS amendment effective June 9, 2023, reinforce the requirement for defense contractors to conduct thorough supply chain due diligence to ensure the absence of forced labor. These measures, which include updates under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, underscore the importance of ethical supply chain practices among defense companies.

  • +50

    Supply Chain Ethics

    May 13

    The regulatory actions impose stricter supply chain due diligence requirements on defense contractors, thereby promoting ethical sourcing and reducing the risk of forced labor in their supply chains. From an anti-fascist perspective, this enhances accountability and worker protections, which is viewed positively.

    New Government Forced Labor Actions Reemphasize Supply Chain Diligence for Government Contractors and Importers

  • Illegal Contract Imposed at Defense Arsenal Logo
    APR
    04
    2023

    Union officials at the Rock Island Arsenal, an Illinois Defense Department facility, allege that management unilaterally imposed a new collective bargaining agreement without proper negotiations over management rights mandated by a Biden executive order. The union contends that over 20 contract articles were changed without agreement, undermining workers' rights and violating federal labor law.

  • -80

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    May 13

    The management's unilateral imposition of a new contract, bypassing negotiation over critical management rights as required by federal directives, represents a significant breach of labor relations and human rights practices. This act disregards union protections and undermines worker bargaining power, aligning with anti-union practices that are detrimental to fair labor standards.

    Union Accuses Defense Management of Imposing an Illegal Contract

  • Defense Companies' Lobbying Expenditure Revealed Logo
    MAR
    31
    2023

    Data from OpenSecrets shows that defense companies spent approximately $141.8 million on lobbying in 2023, highlighting significant corporate efforts to influence U.S. policy in the defense sector.

  • -70

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    May 13

    The reported $141,778,649 spent on lobbying in the defense sector indicates considerable use of financial power to shape policy outcomes in favor of militaristic and potentially authoritarian agendas. This level of political influence is concerning from an anti-fascist perspective as it can undermine democratic accountability and promote aggressive defense policies.

    Defense Lobbying Profile

  • Defense Companies’ Lobbying and Regulatory Influence on Arms Sales Logo
    FEB
    25
    2021

    An OpenSecrets report from February 25, 2021, details how major U.S. defense companies leverage extensive lobbying efforts and revolving door practices to influence defense policy, secure massive campaign contributions, and maintain close ties with regulatory bodies. The report highlights controversial arms sales to authoritarian regimes such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE, raising concerns about undue political influence and regulatory capture.

  • -80

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    May 13

    The report shows that defense companies spend large sums on political contributions and lobbying ($285 million in campaign contributions and $2.5 billion in lobbying spending) to shape defense policy. This financial leverage, often used to secure arms deals with authoritarian regimes, reflects a worrisome misuse of political influence.

    Capitalizing on Conflict: How defense contractors and foreign nations lobby for arms sales

  • -70

    Regulatory Capture

    May 13

    The report highlights a pervasive revolving door between defense companies and regulatory agencies. Such practices allow these companies to exert disproportionate influence over regulatory bodies like the State Department and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, undermining democratic oversight and accountability in arms sales.

    Capitalizing on Conflict: How defense contractors and foreign nations lobby for arms sales

Industries

334511
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
336411
Aircraft Manufacturing
336414
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
541712
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Biotechnology)
332995
Other Ordnance and Accessories Manufacturing